2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Loops
=====
2013-09-25 05:18:43 +00:00
2013-10-05 17:50:53 +00:00
Often you'll want to do many things in one task, such as create a lot of users, install a lot of packages, or
repeat a polling step until a certain result is reached.
This chapter is all about how to use loops in playbooks.
2013-09-25 04:26:14 +00:00
2013-12-26 19:32:01 +00:00
.. contents :: Topics
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
.. _standard_loops:
2013-09-25 04:26:14 +00:00
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Standard Loops
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
To save some typing, repeated tasks can be written in short-hand like so::
2013-03-02 16:47:43 +00:00
- name: add several users
2013-09-18 17:22:19 +00:00
user: name={{ item }} state=present groups=wheel
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
with_items:
- testuser1
- testuser2
2012-08-01 02:19:04 +00:00
If you have defined a YAML list in a variables file, or the 'vars' section, you can also do::
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_items: "{{somelist}}"
2012-08-01 02:19:04 +00:00
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
The above would be the equivalent of::
- name: add user testuser1
2013-09-18 17:22:19 +00:00
user: name=testuser1 state=present groups=wheel
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
- name: add user testuser2
2013-09-18 17:22:19 +00:00
user: name=testuser2 state=present groups=wheel
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
2012-10-08 11:38:21 +00:00
The yum and apt modules use with_items to execute fewer package manager transactions.
2012-05-13 15:00:02 +00:00
2012-10-16 23:12:31 +00:00
Note that the types of items you iterate over with 'with_items' do not have to be simple lists of strings.
2012-10-16 22:58:31 +00:00
If you have a list of hashes, you can reference subkeys using things like::
2013-05-29 22:05:14 +00:00
- name: add several users
2013-09-18 17:22:19 +00:00
user: name={{ item.name }} state=present groups={{ item.groups }}
2013-05-29 22:05:14 +00:00
with_items:
- { name: 'testuser1', groups: 'wheel' }
- { name: 'testuser2', groups: 'root' }
2012-10-16 22:58:31 +00:00
2015-03-06 21:35:49 +00:00
Also be aware that when combining `when` with `with_items` (or any other loop statement), the `when` statement is processed separately for each item. See :ref: `the_when_statement` for an example.
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
.. _nested_loops:
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
Nested Loops
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-07-19 13:31:50 +00:00
Loops can be nested as well::
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
2013-07-19 13:13:30 +00:00
- name: give users access to multiple databases
2013-10-03 11:00:17 +00:00
mysql_user: name={{ item[0] }} priv={{ item[1] }}.*:ALL append_privs=yes password=foo
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
with_nested:
2014-06-04 00:45:03 +00:00
- [ 'alice', 'bob' ]
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
- [ 'clientdb', 'employeedb', 'providerdb' ]
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
As with the case of 'with_items' above, you can use previously defined variables.::
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
- name: here, 'users' contains the above list of employees
2013-10-03 11:00:17 +00:00
mysql_user: name={{ item[0] }} priv={{ item[1] }}.*:ALL append_privs=yes password=foo
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
with_nested:
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
- "{{users}}"
2013-07-15 04:28:02 +00:00
- [ 'clientdb', 'employeedb', 'providerdb' ]
2014-02-11 22:58:51 +00:00
.. _looping_over_hashes:
Looping over Hashes
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
.. versionadded :: 1.5
Suppose you have the following variable::
---
users:
alice:
name: Alice Appleworth
telephone: 123-456-7890
bob:
name: Bob Bananarama
telephone: 987-654-3210
And you want to print every user's name and phone number. You can loop through the elements of a hash using `` with_dict `` like this::
tasks:
- name: Print phone records
debug: msg="User {{ item.key }} is {{ item.value.name }} ({{ item.value.telephone }})"
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_dict: "{{users}}"
2014-02-11 22:58:51 +00:00
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
.. _looping_over_fileglobs:
2015-10-28 20:45:12 +00:00
Looping over Files
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2016-01-20 02:20:10 +00:00
`` with_file `` iterates over the content of a list of files, `item` will be set to the content of each file in sequence. It can be used like this::
2015-10-28 20:45:12 +00:00
---
- hosts: all
tasks:
# emit a debug message containing the content of each file.
- debug:
msg: "{{item}}"
with_file:
- first_example_file
- second_example_file
Assuming that `` first_example_file `` contained the text "hello" and `` second_example_file `` contained the text "world", this would result in::
TASK [debug msg={{item}}] ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** *** *
ok: [localhost] => (item=hello) => {
"item": "hello",
"msg": "hello"
}
ok: [localhost] => (item=world) => {
"item": "world",
"msg": "world"
}
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Looping over Fileglobs
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2012-10-16 22:51:10 +00:00
2013-04-05 17:00:23 +00:00
`` with_fileglob `` matches all files in a single directory, non-recursively, that match a pattern. It can
2012-10-16 22:51:10 +00:00
be used like this::
2013-05-31 08:54:13 +00:00
---
2012-10-16 22:51:10 +00:00
- hosts: all
tasks:
# first ensure our target directory exists
2013-07-15 17:50:48 +00:00
- file: dest=/etc/fooapp state=directory
2012-10-16 22:51:10 +00:00
# copy each file over that matches the given pattern
2013-07-15 17:50:48 +00:00
- copy: src={{ item }} dest=/etc/fooapp/ owner=root mode=600
2013-02-17 17:47:51 +00:00
with_fileglob:
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
- /playbooks/files/fooapp/*
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
2014-04-23 21:52:32 +00:00
.. note :: When using a relative path with `` with_fileglob `` in a role, Ansible resolves the path relative to the `roles/<rolename>/files` directory.
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Looping over Parallel Sets of Data
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-06-14 15:13:38 +00:00
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
.. note :: This is an uncommon thing to want to do, but we're documenting it for completeness. You probably won't be reaching for this one often.
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
Suppose you have the following variable data was loaded in via somewhere::
---
alpha: [ 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd' ]
numbers: [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
And you want the set of '(a, 1)' and '(b, 2)' and so on. Use 'with_together' to get this::
tasks:
- debug: msg="{{ item.0 }} and {{ item.1 }}"
with_together:
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
- "{{alpha}}"
- "{{numbers}}"
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Looping over Subelements
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-02-02 17:19:21 +00:00
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
Suppose you want to do something like loop over a list of users, creating them, and allowing them to login by a certain set of
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
SSH keys.
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
How might that be accomplished? Let's assume you had the following defined and loaded in via "vars_files" or maybe a "group_vars/all" file::
---
users:
- name: alice
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
authorized:
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
- /tmp/alice/onekey.pub
- /tmp/alice/twokey.pub
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
mysql:
password: mysql-password
hosts:
- "%"
- "127.0.0.1"
- "::1"
- "localhost"
privs:
- "*.* :SELECT"
- "DB1.*:ALL"
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
- name: bob
authorized:
- /tmp/bob/id_rsa.pub
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
mysql:
password: other-mysql-password
hosts:
- "db1"
privs:
- "*.* :SELECT"
- "DB2.*:ALL"
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
It might happen like so::
- user: name={{ item.name }} state=present generate_ssh_key=yes
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_items: "{{users}}"
2013-02-02 17:56:56 +00:00
2013-11-27 13:12:50 +00:00
- authorized_key: "user={{ item.0.name }} key='{{ lookup('file', item.1) }}'"
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
with_subelements:
2016-03-02 12:12:30 +00:00
- "{{ users }}"
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
- authorized
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
Given the mysql hosts and privs subkey lists, you can also iterate over a list in a nested subkey::
- name: Setup MySQL users
2015-09-20 13:48:07 +00:00
mysql_user: name={{ item.0.name }} password={{ item.0.mysql.password }} host={{ item.1 }} priv={{ item.0.mysql.privs | join('/') }}
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
with_subelements:
2016-03-02 12:12:30 +00:00
- "{{ users }}"
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
- mysql.hosts
Subelements walks a list of hashes (aka dictionaries) and then traverses a list with a given (nested sub-)key inside of those
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
records.
2015-05-12 17:51:35 +00:00
Optionally, you can add a third element to the subelements list, that holds a
dictionary of flags. Currently you can add the 'skip_missing' flag. If set to
True, the lookup plugin will skip the lists items that do not contain the given
subkey. Without this flag, or if that flag is set to False, the plugin will
yield an error and complain about the missing subkey.
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
The authorized_key pattern is exactly where it comes up most.
.. _looping_over_integer_sequences:
2013-02-02 17:19:21 +00:00
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Looping over Integer Sequences
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
2013-04-05 17:00:23 +00:00
`` with_sequence `` generates a sequence of items in ascending numerical order. You
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
can specify a start, end, and an optional step value.
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
2013-04-12 22:21:09 +00:00
Arguments should be specified in key=value pairs. If supplied, the 'format' is a printf style string.
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
2013-02-17 17:47:51 +00:00
Numerical values can be specified in decimal, hexadecimal (0x3f8) or octal (0600).
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
Negative numbers are not supported. This works as follows::
---
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
- hosts: all
tasks:
# create groups
- group: name=evens state=present
- group: name=odds state=present
2013-04-12 22:21:09 +00:00
# create some test users
2013-09-18 17:22:19 +00:00
- user: name={{ item }} state=present groups=evens
2013-04-17 00:41:42 +00:00
with_sequence: start=0 end=32 format=testuser%02x
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
2013-04-12 22:21:09 +00:00
# create a series of directories with even numbers for some reason
- file: dest=/var/stuff/{{ item }} state=directory
with_sequence: start=4 end=16 stride=2
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
2013-02-02 16:51:25 +00:00
# a simpler way to use the sequence plugin
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
# create 4 groups
2013-04-12 22:21:09 +00:00
- group: name=group{{ item }} state=present
2013-01-08 20:13:25 +00:00
with_sequence: count=4
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
.. _random_choice:
Random Choices
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-10-12 12:34:41 +00:00
The 'random_choice' feature can be used to pick something at random. While it's not a load balancer (there are modules
for those), it can somewhat be used as a poor man's loadbalancer in a MacGyver like situation::
2013-10-04 22:34:39 +00:00
- debug: msg={{ item }}
with_random_choice:
- "go through the door"
- "drink from the goblet"
- "press the red button"
- "do nothing"
One of the provided strings will be selected at random.
At a more basic level, they can be used to add chaos and excitement to otherwise predictable automation environments.
.. _do_until_loops:
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Do-Until Loops
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-09-03 04:08:00 +00:00
2013-10-14 12:24:20 +00:00
.. versionadded: 1.4
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
Sometimes you would want to retry a task until a certain condition is met. Here's an example::
- action: shell /usr/bin/foo
register: result
2013-10-03 20:28:29 +00:00
until: result.stdout.find("all systems go") != -1
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
retries: 5
delay: 10
2013-08-12 13:49:34 +00:00
2014-05-03 15:59:50 +00:00
The above example run the shell module recursively till the module's result has "all systems go" in its stdout or the task has
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
been retried for 5 times with a delay of 10 seconds. The default value for "retries" is 3 and "delay" is 5.
2012-08-01 02:19:04 +00:00
2013-09-29 21:02:53 +00:00
The task returns the results returned by the last task run. The results of individual retries can be viewed by -vv option.
The registered variable will also have a new key "attempts" which will have the number of the retries for the task.
2012-08-01 02:19:04 +00:00
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
.. _with_first_found:
Finding First Matched Files
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
.. note :: This is an uncommon thing to want to do, but we're documenting it for completeness. You probably won't be reaching for this one often.
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
This isn't exactly a loop, but it's close. What if you want to use a reference to a file based on the first file found
that matches a given criteria, and some of the filenames are determined by variable names? Yes, you can do that as follows::
- name: INTERFACES | Create Ansible header for /etc/network/interfaces
template: src={{ item }} dest=/etc/foo.conf
with_first_found:
2014-03-27 20:42:40 +00:00
- "{{ansible_virtualization_type}}_foo.conf"
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
- "default_foo.conf"
This tool also has a long form version that allows for configurable search paths. Here's an example::
- name: some configuration template
template: src={{ item }} dest=/etc/file.cfg mode=0444 owner=root group=root
with_first_found:
- files:
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
- "{{inventory_hostname}}/etc/file.cfg"
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
paths:
- ../../../templates.overwrites
- ../../../templates
- files:
- etc/file.cfg
paths:
- templates
.. _looping_over_the_results_of_a_program_execution:
Iterating Over The Results of a Program Execution
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
.. note :: This is an uncommon thing to want to do, but we're documenting it for completeness. You probably won't be reaching for this one often.
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
Sometimes you might want to execute a program, and based on the output of that program, loop over the results of that line by line.
2016-04-25 16:16:28 +00:00
Ansible provides a neat way to do that, though you should remember, this is always executed on the control machine, not the remote
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
machine::
- name: Example of looping over a command result
shell: /usr/bin/frobnicate {{ item }}
with_lines: /usr/bin/frobnications_per_host --param {{ inventory_hostname }}
Ok, that was a bit arbitrary. In fact, if you're doing something that is inventory related you might just want to write a dynamic
inventory source instead (see :doc: `intro_dynamic_inventory` ), but this can be occasionally useful in quick-and-dirty implementations.
Should you ever need to execute a command remotely, you would not use the above method. Instead do this::
- name: Example of looping over a REMOTE command result
shell: /usr/bin/something
register: command_result
- name: Do something with each result
shell: /usr/bin/something_else --param {{ item }}
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_items: "{{command_result.stdout_lines}}"
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
.. _indexed_lists:
Looping Over A List With An Index
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
.. note :: This is an uncommon thing to want to do, but we're documenting it for completeness. You probably won't be reaching for this one often.
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
.. versionadded: 1.3
If you want to loop over an array and also get the numeric index of where you are in the array as you go, you can also do that.
It's uncommonly used::
- name: indexed loop demo
debug: msg="at array position {{ item.0 }} there is a value {{ item.1 }}"
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_indexed_items: "{{some_list}}"
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
2015-08-05 09:09:40 +00:00
.. _using_ini_with_a_loop:
Using ini file with a loop
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
.. versionadded: 2.0
The ini plugin can use regexp to retrieve a set of keys. As a consequence, we can loop over this set. Here is the ini file we'll use::
[section1]
value1=section1/value1
value2=section1/value2
[section2]
value1=section2/value1
value2=section2/value2
Here is an example of using `` with_ini `` ::
- debug: msg="{{item}}"
with_ini: value[1-2] section=section1 file=lookup.ini re=true
And here is the returned value::
{
"changed": false,
"msg": "All items completed",
"results": [
{
"invocation": {
"module_args": "msg=\"section1/value1\"",
"module_name": "debug"
},
"item": "section1/value1",
"msg": "section1/value1",
"verbose_always": true
},
{
"invocation": {
"module_args": "msg=\"section1/value2\"",
"module_name": "debug"
},
"item": "section1/value2",
"msg": "section1/value2",
"verbose_always": true
}
]
}
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
.. _flattening_a_list:
Flattening A List
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-10-13 12:57:10 +00:00
.. note :: This is an uncommon thing to want to do, but we're documenting it for completeness. You probably won't be reaching for this one often.
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
In rare instances you might have several lists of lists, and you just want to iterate over every item in all of those lists. Assume
a really crazy hypothetical datastructure::
----
# file: roles/foo/vars/main.yml
packages_base:
- [ 'foo-package', 'bar-package' ]
packages_apps:
- [ ['one-package', 'two-package' ]]
- [ ['red-package'], ['blue-package']]
As you can see the formatting of packages in these lists is all over the place. How can we install all of the packages in both lists?::
- name: flattened loop demo
yum: name={{ item }} state=installed
with_flattened:
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
- "{{packages_base}}"
- "{{packages_apps}}"
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
That's how!
2013-12-20 17:37:38 +00:00
.. _using_register_with_a_loop:
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
2013-12-19 18:11:00 +00:00
Using register with a loop
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2014-01-09 00:17:36 +00:00
When using `` register `` with a loop the data structure placed in the variable during a loop, will contain a `` results `` attribute, that is a list of all responses from the module.
2013-12-19 18:11:00 +00:00
2013-12-20 17:37:38 +00:00
Here is an example of using `` register `` with `` with_items `` ::
2013-12-19 18:11:00 +00:00
- shell: echo "{{ item }}"
with_items:
- one
- two
register: echo
2014-01-09 00:17:36 +00:00
This differs from the data structure returned when using `` register `` without a loop::
2013-12-19 18:11:00 +00:00
{
"changed": true,
"msg": "All items completed",
"results": [
{
"changed": true,
"cmd": "echo \"one\" ",
"delta": "0:00:00.003110",
"end": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.187153",
"invocation": {
"module_args": "echo \"one\"",
"module_name": "shell"
},
"item": "one",
"rc": 0,
"start": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.184043",
"stderr": "",
"stdout": "one"
},
{
"changed": true,
"cmd": "echo \"two\" ",
"delta": "0:00:00.002920",
"end": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.245502",
"invocation": {
"module_args": "echo \"two\"",
"module_name": "shell"
},
"item": "two",
"rc": 0,
"start": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.242582",
"stderr": "",
"stdout": "two"
}
]
}
Subsequent loops over the registered variable to inspect the results may look like::
- name: Fail if return code is not 0
fail:
msg: "The command ({{ item.cmd }}) did not have a 0 return code"
when: item.rc != 0
2015-06-03 15:15:13 +00:00
with_items: "{{echo.results}}"
2013-12-19 18:11:00 +00:00
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-12-01 23:21:10 +00:00
.. _looping_over_the_inventory:
Looping over the inventory
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
If you wish to loop over the inventory, or just a subset of it, there is multiple ways.
One can use a regular `` with_items `` with the `` play_hosts `` or `` groups `` variables, like this::
# show all the hosts in the inventory
- debug: msg={{ item }}
with_items: "{{groups['all']}}"
# show all the hosts in the current play
- debug: msg={{ item }}
with_items: play_hosts
There is also a specific lookup plugin `` inventory_hostname `` that can be used like this::
# show all the hosts in the inventory
- debug: msg={{ item }}
2016-02-02 14:40:49 +00:00
with_inventory_hostnames: all
2015-12-01 23:21:10 +00:00
# show all the hosts matching the pattern, ie all but the group www
- debug: msg={{ item }}
2016-02-02 14:40:49 +00:00
with_inventory_hostnames: all:!www
2015-12-01 23:21:10 +00:00
More information on the patterns can be found on :doc: `intro_patterns`
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
.. _loop_control:
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
Loop Control
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
.. versionadded: 2.1
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
In 2.0 you are again able to use `with_` loops and task includes (but not playbook includes). This adds the ability to loop over the set of tasks in one shot.
Ansible by default sets the loop variable `item` for each loop, which causes these nested loops to overwrite the value of `item` from the "outer" loops.
As of Ansible 2.1, the `loop_control` option can be used to specify the name of the variable to be used for the loop::
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
# main.yml
- include: test.yml outer_loop="{{outer_item}}"
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
with_items:
- 1
- 2
- 3
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
loop_control:
loop_var: outer_item
# inner.yml
- debug: msg="outer item={{outer_loop}} inner item={{item}}"
with_items:
- a
- b
- c
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
.. note :: If Ansible detects that the current loop is using a variable which has already been defined, it will raise an error to fail the task.
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
2015-10-23 07:27:09 +00:00
.. _loops_and_includes_2.0:
Loops and Includes in 2.0
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
Because `loop_control` is not available in Ansible 2.0, when using an include with a loop you should use `set_fact` to save the "outer" loops value
for `item` ::
# main.yml
- include: test.yml
with_items:
- 1
- 2
- 3
# inner.yml
- set_fact:
outer_item: "{{item}}"
- debug:
msg: "outer item={{outer_item}} inner item={{item}}"
2015-10-23 14:31:57 +00:00
with_items:
- a
- b
- c
2013-12-20 17:37:38 +00:00
.. _writing_your_own_iterators:
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
Writing Your Own Iterators
`` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ``
2013-12-21 07:06:38 +00:00
While you ordinarily shouldn't have to, should you wish to write your own ways to loop over arbitrary datastructures, you can read :doc: `developing_plugins` for some starter
2013-10-13 12:54:36 +00:00
information. Each of the above features are implemented as plugins in ansible, so there are many implementations to reference.
2013-10-05 16:31:16 +00:00
.. seealso ::
:doc: `playbooks`
An introduction to playbooks
:doc: `playbooks_roles`
Playbook organization by roles
:doc: `playbooks_best_practices`
Best practices in playbooks
:doc: `playbooks_conditionals`
Conditional statements in playbooks
:doc: `playbooks_variables`
All about variables
`User Mailing List <http://groups.google.com/group/ansible-devel> `_
Have a question? Stop by the google group!
`irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> `_
#ansible IRC chat channel