Clarify documentation on _info vs. _facts modules (#56611)
* Clarify documentation on _info vs. _facts modules. * Expand with examples for facts and non-facts.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b712b01f6e
commit
abca3f1956
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Scoping your module(s)
|
|||
Especially if you want to contribute your module(s) back to Ansible Core, make sure each module includes enough logic and functionality, but not too much. If you're finding these guidelines tricky, consider :ref:`whether you really need to write a module <module_dev_should_you>` at all.
|
||||
|
||||
* Each module should have a concise and well-defined functionality. Basically, follow the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing well.
|
||||
* Do not add ``list`` or ``info`` state options to an existing module - create a new ``_facts`` module.
|
||||
* Do not add ``list`` or ``info`` state options to an existing module - create a new ``_info`` or ``_facts`` module.
|
||||
* Modules should not require that a user know all the underlying options of an API/tool to be used. For instance, if the legal values for a required module parameter cannot be documented, the module does not belong in Ansible Core.
|
||||
* Modules should encompass much of the logic for interacting with a resource. A lightweight wrapper around a complex API forces users to offload too much logic into their playbooks. If you want to connect Ansible to a complex API, :ref:`create multiple modules <developing_modules_in_groups>` that interact with smaller individual pieces of the API.
|
||||
* Avoid creating a module that does the work of other modules; this leads to code duplication and divergence, and makes things less uniform, unpredictable and harder to maintain. Modules should be the building blocks. If you are asking 'how can I have a module execute other modules' ... you want to write a role.
|
||||
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Ansible conventions offer a predictable user interface across all modules, playb
|
|||
* Use consistent parameters (arguments) within your module(s).
|
||||
* Normalize parameters with other modules - if Ansible and the API your module connects to use different names for the same parameter, add aliases to your parameters so the user can choose which names to use in tasks and playbooks.
|
||||
* Return facts from ``*_facts`` modules in the ``ansible_facts`` field of the :ref:`result dictionary<common_return_values>` so other modules can access them.
|
||||
* Implement ``check_mode`` in all ``*_facts`` modules. Playbooks which conditionalize based on fact information will only conditionalize correctly in ``check_mode`` if the facts are returned in ``check_mode``. Usually you can add ``supports_check_mode=True`` when instantiating ``AnsibleModule``.
|
||||
* Implement ``check_mode`` in all ``*_info`` and ``*_facts`` modules. Playbooks which conditionalize based on fact information will only conditionalize correctly in ``check_mode`` if the facts are returned in ``check_mode``. Usually you can add ``supports_check_mode=True`` when instantiating ``AnsibleModule``.
|
||||
* Use module-specific environment variables. For example, if you use the helpers in ``module_utils.api`` for basic authentication with ``module_utils.urls.fetch_url()`` and you fall back on environment variables for default values, use a module-specific environment variable like :code:`API_<MODULENAME>_USERNAME` to avoid conflict between modules.
|
||||
* Keep module options simple and focused - if you're loading a lot of choices/states on an existing option, consider adding a new, simple option instead.
|
||||
* Keep options small when possible. Passing a large data structure to an option might save us a few tasks, but it adds a complex requirement that we cannot easily validate before passing on to the module.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ To contribute a module to Ansible, you must:
|
|||
* minimize module dependencies
|
||||
* support :ref:`check_mode <check_mode_dry>` if possible
|
||||
* ensure your code is readable
|
||||
* if a module is named ``<something>_facts``, it should be because its main purpose is returning ``ansible_facts``. Do not name modules that do not do this with ``_facts``.
|
||||
* Modules that query/return general information (and not ``ansible_facts``) should be named ``_info``.
|
||||
* if a module is named ``<something>_facts``, it should be because its main purpose is returning ``ansible_facts``. Do not name modules that do not do this with ``_facts``. Only use ``ansible_facts`` for information that is specific to the host machine, for example network interfaces and their configuration, which operating system and which programs are installed.
|
||||
* Modules that query/return general information (and not ``ansible_facts``) should be named ``_info``. General information is non-host specific information, for example information on online/cloud services (you can access different accounts for the same online service from the same host), or information on VMs and containers accessible from the machine.
|
||||
|
||||
Please make sure your module meets these requirements before you submit your PR/proposal. If you have questions, reach out via `Ansible's IRC chat channel <http://irc.freenode.net>`_ or the `Ansible development mailing list <https://groups.google.com/group/ansible-devel>`_.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue