Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aku Kotkavuo
7ff9f2e04e Update Ruby to 1.9.1-p378
Closes Homebrew/homebrew#520
2010-01-24 12:33:07 +00:00
Lincoln Stoll
e159e4b091 Add an option to add a 1.9 suffix to ruby 2010-01-24 12:31:59 +00:00
Lon Baker
8dc4c742df Update ruby to 1.9.1-p376 release
This is a security release.
2009-12-22 03:28:59 +00:00
Max Howell
afe6d84351 Warn users that gems can be troublesome with our formula 2009-12-02 12:41:23 +00:00
Max Howell
3d5c44bdae Revert "Don't install gem or rake"
This reverts commit d0ed812b3dfa94507ac3c6c9b4a8ec54c1f3251f.

Fixes Homebrew/homebrew#129
2009-12-02 12:37:30 +00:00
Max Howell
716dae1d28 Don't install gem or rake
Because the system comes with them. Having two of these is just complicated.
They are both gems themselves, so gem that is already installed manages them.

Optional flag to install them anyway.
2009-11-11 23:04:56 +00:00
Faisal N. Jawdat
f59a7ed021 ruby formula forces gcc, to work around llvm breakage 2009-11-09 15:44:39 -08:00
Aanand Prasad
f7bb85bcce Add readline dependency to Ruby 2009-10-19 04:02:49 +01:00
Max Howell
61b2307139 s/require 'brewkit'/require 'formula'/g
brewkit.rb changes ENV destructively, so lets not do that everytime a formula
is required. Now it's possible for other tools to require a formula
description without worrying about side-effects.
2009-10-15 16:48:03 +01:00
elliottcable
b966833a3e Building Ruby with pthread is bad practice.
Ruby is not natively threaded; there is absolutely no reason to build against
pthread unless you intend to link against libraries themselves built with
pthread (tcl/tk). More information: http://blogs.sun.com/prashant/entry/ruby_and_enable_pthreads
2009-09-22 13:21:54 -08:00
elliottcable
b66629b371 I can’t find an explanation of CFLAGS=-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=1, so I’m removing it.
As far as I can deduce, the source of that flag is in Dan Benjamin’s article,
here: http://hivelogic.com/articles/ruby-rails-leopard

However, he provides no explanation for its use, and did not respond to
commentors’ requests for said explanation; on top of that, I can find no useful
references anywhere else. Hence, removing it.
2009-09-22 13:18:38 -08:00
Max Howell
965eaf5159 Revert to Ruby 1.9
Old formulas are valid, but should be maintained in a separate branch if
that's what is needed.

The exact way we are going to do this is not yet agreed on.
2009-09-21 22:02:35 +01:00
Mike Enriquez
b6bc632994 Ruby 64-bit formula
Signed-off-by: Max Howell <max@methylblue.com>

I adapted our existing ruby formula using the best bits of them both.
2009-09-18 13:37:14 +01:00
Clinton R. Nixon
4f0d14b994 Ruby 1.9.1 formula 2009-09-14 20:33:46 +01:00