openssl/crypto/bio/b_print.c

957 lines
26 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright 1995-2016 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Licensed under the OpenSSL license (the "License"). You may not use
* this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy
* in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
* https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
*/
#include <stdio.h>
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include "internal/numbers.h"
#include "internal/cryptlib.h"
#ifndef NO_SYS_TYPES_H
# include <sys/types.h>
#endif
#include <openssl/bn.h> /* To get BN_LLONG properly defined */
#include <openssl/bio.h>
#if defined(BN_LLONG) || defined(SIXTY_FOUR_BIT)
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
# ifndef HAVE_LONG_LONG
# define HAVE_LONG_LONG 1
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
# endif
#endif
/*
* Copyright Patrick Powell 1995
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
* This code is based on code written by Patrick Powell <papowell@astart.com>
* It may be used for any purpose as long as this notice remains intact
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
* on all source code distributions.
*/
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE
# define LDOUBLE long double
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#else
# define LDOUBLE double
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG
# if defined(_WIN32) && !defined(__GNUC__)
# define LLONG __int64
# else
# define LLONG long long
# endif
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#else
# define LLONG long
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#endif
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int fmtstr(char **, char **, size_t *, size_t *,
const char *, int, int, int);
static int fmtint(char **, char **, size_t *, size_t *,
LLONG, int, int, int, int);
static int fmtfp(char **, char **, size_t *, size_t *,
LDOUBLE, int, int, int, int);
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int doapr_outch(char **, char **, size_t *, size_t *, int);
static int _dopr(char **sbuffer, char **buffer,
size_t *maxlen, size_t *retlen, int *truncated,
const char *format, va_list args);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* format read states */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_S_DEFAULT 0
#define DP_S_FLAGS 1
#define DP_S_MIN 2
#define DP_S_DOT 3
#define DP_S_MAX 4
#define DP_S_MOD 5
#define DP_S_CONV 6
#define DP_S_DONE 7
/* format flags - Bits */
/* left-aligned padding */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_MINUS (1 << 0)
/* print an explicit '+' for a value with positive sign */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_PLUS (1 << 1)
/* print an explicit ' ' for a value with positive sign */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_SPACE (1 << 2)
/* print 0/0x prefix for octal/hex and decimal point for floating point */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_NUM (1 << 3)
/* print leading zeroes */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_ZERO (1 << 4)
/* print HEX in UPPPERcase */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_UP (1 << 5)
/* treat value as unsigned */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
#define DP_F_UNSIGNED (1 << 6)
/* conversion flags */
#define DP_C_SHORT 1
#define DP_C_LONG 2
#define DP_C_LDOUBLE 3
#define DP_C_LLONG 4
#define DP_C_SIZE 5
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* Floating point formats */
#define F_FORMAT 0
#define E_FORMAT 1
#define G_FORMAT 2
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* some handy macros */
#define char_to_int(p) (p - '0')
#define OSSL_MAX(p,q) ((p >= q) ? p : q)
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int
_dopr(char **sbuffer,
char **buffer,
size_t *maxlen,
size_t *retlen, int *truncated, const char *format, va_list args)
{
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
char ch;
LLONG value;
LDOUBLE fvalue;
char *strvalue;
int min;
int max;
int state;
int flags;
int cflags;
size_t currlen;
state = DP_S_DEFAULT;
flags = currlen = cflags = min = 0;
max = -1;
ch = *format++;
while (state != DP_S_DONE) {
if (ch == '\0' || (buffer == NULL && currlen >= *maxlen))
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
state = DP_S_DONE;
switch (state) {
case DP_S_DEFAULT:
if (ch == '%')
state = DP_S_FLAGS;
else
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, ch))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
ch = *format++;
break;
case DP_S_FLAGS:
switch (ch) {
case '-':
flags |= DP_F_MINUS;
ch = *format++;
break;
case '+':
flags |= DP_F_PLUS;
ch = *format++;
break;
case ' ':
flags |= DP_F_SPACE;
ch = *format++;
break;
case '#':
flags |= DP_F_NUM;
ch = *format++;
break;
case '0':
flags |= DP_F_ZERO;
ch = *format++;
break;
default:
state = DP_S_MIN;
break;
}
break;
case DP_S_MIN:
if (isdigit((unsigned char)ch)) {
min = 10 * min + char_to_int(ch);
ch = *format++;
} else if (ch == '*') {
min = va_arg(args, int);
ch = *format++;
state = DP_S_DOT;
} else
state = DP_S_DOT;
break;
case DP_S_DOT:
if (ch == '.') {
state = DP_S_MAX;
ch = *format++;
} else
state = DP_S_MOD;
break;
case DP_S_MAX:
if (isdigit((unsigned char)ch)) {
if (max < 0)
max = 0;
max = 10 * max + char_to_int(ch);
ch = *format++;
} else if (ch == '*') {
max = va_arg(args, int);
ch = *format++;
state = DP_S_MOD;
} else
state = DP_S_MOD;
break;
case DP_S_MOD:
switch (ch) {
case 'h':
cflags = DP_C_SHORT;
ch = *format++;
break;
case 'l':
if (*format == 'l') {
cflags = DP_C_LLONG;
format++;
} else
cflags = DP_C_LONG;
ch = *format++;
break;
case 'q':
case 'j':
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
cflags = DP_C_LLONG;
ch = *format++;
break;
case 'L':
cflags = DP_C_LDOUBLE;
ch = *format++;
break;
case 'z':
cflags = DP_C_SIZE;
ch = *format++;
break;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
default:
break;
}
state = DP_S_CONV;
break;
case DP_S_CONV:
switch (ch) {
case 'd':
case 'i':
switch (cflags) {
case DP_C_SHORT:
value = (short int)va_arg(args, int);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case DP_C_LONG:
value = va_arg(args, long int);
break;
case DP_C_LLONG:
value = va_arg(args, LLONG);
break;
case DP_C_SIZE:
value = va_arg(args, ossl_ssize_t);
break;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
default:
value = va_arg(args, int);
break;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!fmtint(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, value, 10, min,
max, flags))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'X':
flags |= DP_F_UP;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case 'x':
case 'o':
case 'u':
flags |= DP_F_UNSIGNED;
switch (cflags) {
case DP_C_SHORT:
2000-02-28 11:30:31 +00:00
value = (unsigned short int)va_arg(args, unsigned int);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case DP_C_LONG:
value = (LLONG)va_arg(args, unsigned long int);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case DP_C_LLONG:
value = va_arg(args, unsigned LLONG);
break;
case DP_C_SIZE:
value = va_arg(args, size_t);
break;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
default:
value = (LLONG)va_arg(args, unsigned int);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!fmtint(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, value,
ch == 'o' ? 8 : (ch == 'u' ? 10 : 16),
min, max, flags))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'f':
if (cflags == DP_C_LDOUBLE)
fvalue = va_arg(args, LDOUBLE);
else
fvalue = va_arg(args, double);
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!fmtfp(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, fvalue, min, max,
flags, F_FORMAT))
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'E':
flags |= DP_F_UP;
case 'e':
if (cflags == DP_C_LDOUBLE)
fvalue = va_arg(args, LDOUBLE);
else
fvalue = va_arg(args, double);
if (!fmtfp(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, fvalue, min, max,
flags, E_FORMAT))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'G':
flags |= DP_F_UP;
case 'g':
if (cflags == DP_C_LDOUBLE)
fvalue = va_arg(args, LDOUBLE);
else
fvalue = va_arg(args, double);
if (!fmtfp(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, fvalue, min, max,
flags, G_FORMAT))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'c':
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen,
va_arg(args, int)))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 's':
strvalue = va_arg(args, char *);
if (max < 0) {
if (buffer)
max = INT_MAX;
else
max = *maxlen;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!fmtstr(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, strvalue,
flags, min, max))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'p':
value = (size_t)va_arg(args, void *);
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!fmtint(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen,
value, 16, min, max, flags | DP_F_NUM))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'n': /* XXX */
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (cflags == DP_C_SHORT) {
short int *num;
num = va_arg(args, short int *);
*num = currlen;
} else if (cflags == DP_C_LONG) { /* XXX */
long int *num;
num = va_arg(args, long int *);
*num = (long int)currlen;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
} else if (cflags == DP_C_LLONG) { /* XXX */
LLONG *num;
num = va_arg(args, LLONG *);
*num = (LLONG) currlen;
} else {
int *num;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
num = va_arg(args, int *);
*num = currlen;
}
break;
case '%':
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, ch))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
break;
case 'w':
/* not supported yet, treat as next char */
ch = *format++;
break;
default:
/* unknown, skip */
break;
}
ch = *format++;
state = DP_S_DEFAULT;
flags = cflags = min = 0;
max = -1;
break;
case DP_S_DONE:
break;
default:
break;
}
}
/*
* We have to truncate if there is no dynamic buffer and we have filled the
* static buffer.
*/
if (buffer == NULL) {
*truncated = (currlen > *maxlen - 1);
if (*truncated)
currlen = *maxlen - 1;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, &currlen, maxlen, '\0'))
return 0;
*retlen = currlen - 1;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 1;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int
fmtstr(char **sbuffer,
char **buffer,
size_t *currlen,
size_t *maxlen, const char *value, int flags, int min, int max)
{
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
int padlen;
size_t strln;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
int cnt = 0;
if (value == 0)
value = "<NULL>";
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
strln = OPENSSL_strnlen(value, max < 0 ? SIZE_MAX : (size_t)max);
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
padlen = min - strln;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (min < 0 || padlen < 0)
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
padlen = 0;
if (max >= 0) {
/*
* Calculate the maximum output including padding.
* Make sure max doesn't overflow into negativity
*/
if (max < INT_MAX - padlen)
max += padlen;
else
max = INT_MAX;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (flags & DP_F_MINUS)
padlen = -padlen;
while ((padlen > 0) && (max < 0 || cnt < max)) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--padlen;
++cnt;
}
while (strln > 0 && (max < 0 || cnt < max)) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, *value++))
return 0;
--strln;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
++cnt;
}
while ((padlen < 0) && (max < 0 || cnt < max)) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
++padlen;
++cnt;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 1;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int
fmtint(char **sbuffer,
char **buffer,
size_t *currlen,
size_t *maxlen, LLONG value, int base, int min, int max, int flags)
{
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
int signvalue = 0;
2005-04-05 10:29:43 +00:00
const char *prefix = "";
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
unsigned LLONG uvalue;
char convert[DECIMAL_SIZE(value) + 3];
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
int place = 0;
int spadlen = 0;
int zpadlen = 0;
int caps = 0;
if (max < 0)
max = 0;
uvalue = value;
if (!(flags & DP_F_UNSIGNED)) {
if (value < 0) {
signvalue = '-';
uvalue = 0 - (unsigned LLONG)value;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
} else if (flags & DP_F_PLUS)
signvalue = '+';
else if (flags & DP_F_SPACE)
signvalue = ' ';
}
if (flags & DP_F_NUM) {
if (base == 8)
prefix = "0";
if (base == 16)
prefix = "0x";
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (flags & DP_F_UP)
caps = 1;
do {
convert[place++] = (caps ? "0123456789ABCDEF" : "0123456789abcdef")
[uvalue % (unsigned)base];
uvalue = (uvalue / (unsigned)base);
} while (uvalue && (place < (int)sizeof(convert)));
if (place == sizeof(convert))
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
place--;
convert[place] = 0;
zpadlen = max - place;
spadlen =
min - OSSL_MAX(max, place) - (signvalue ? 1 : 0) - strlen(prefix);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (zpadlen < 0)
zpadlen = 0;
if (spadlen < 0)
spadlen = 0;
if (flags & DP_F_ZERO) {
zpadlen = OSSL_MAX(zpadlen, spadlen);
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
spadlen = 0;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (flags & DP_F_MINUS)
spadlen = -spadlen;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* spaces */
while (spadlen > 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--spadlen;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* sign */
if (signvalue)
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, signvalue))
return 0;
/* prefix */
while (*prefix) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, *prefix))
return 0;
prefix++;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* zeros */
if (zpadlen > 0) {
while (zpadlen > 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '0'))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--zpadlen;
}
}
/* digits */
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
while (place > 0) {
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, convert[--place]))
return 0;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* left justified spaces */
while (spadlen < 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
++spadlen;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 1;
}
static LDOUBLE abs_val(LDOUBLE value)
{
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
LDOUBLE result = value;
if (value < 0)
result = -value;
return result;
}
static LDOUBLE pow_10(int in_exp)
{
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
LDOUBLE result = 1;
while (in_exp) {
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
result *= 10;
in_exp--;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
}
return result;
}
static long roundv(LDOUBLE value)
{
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
long intpart;
intpart = (long)value;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
value = value - intpart;
if (value >= 0.5)
intpart++;
return intpart;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
static int
fmtfp(char **sbuffer,
char **buffer,
size_t *currlen,
size_t *maxlen, LDOUBLE fvalue, int min, int max, int flags, int style)
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
{
int signvalue = 0;
LDOUBLE ufvalue;
LDOUBLE tmpvalue;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
char iconvert[20];
char fconvert[20];
char econvert[20];
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
int iplace = 0;
int fplace = 0;
int eplace = 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
int padlen = 0;
int zpadlen = 0;
long exp = 0;
unsigned long intpart;
unsigned long fracpart;
unsigned long max10;
int realstyle;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (max < 0)
max = 6;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (fvalue < 0)
signvalue = '-';
else if (flags & DP_F_PLUS)
signvalue = '+';
else if (flags & DP_F_SPACE)
signvalue = ' ';
/*
* G_FORMAT sometimes prints like E_FORMAT and sometimes like F_FORMAT
* depending on the number to be printed. Work out which one it is and use
* that from here on.
*/
if (style == G_FORMAT) {
if (fvalue == 0.0) {
realstyle = F_FORMAT;
} else if (fvalue < 0.0001) {
realstyle = E_FORMAT;
} else if ((max == 0 && fvalue >= 10)
|| (max > 0 && fvalue >= pow_10(max))) {
realstyle = E_FORMAT;
} else {
realstyle = F_FORMAT;
}
} else {
realstyle = style;
}
if (style != F_FORMAT) {
tmpvalue = fvalue;
/* Calculate the exponent */
if (fvalue != 0.0) {
while (tmpvalue < 1) {
tmpvalue *= 10;
exp--;
}
while (tmpvalue > 10) {
tmpvalue /= 10;
exp++;
}
}
if (style == G_FORMAT) {
/*
* In G_FORMAT the "precision" represents significant digits. We
* always have at least 1 significant digit.
*/
if (max == 0)
max = 1;
/* Now convert significant digits to decimal places */
if (realstyle == F_FORMAT) {
max -= (exp + 1);
if (max < 0) {
/*
* Should not happen. If we're in F_FORMAT then exp < max?
*/
return 0;
}
} else {
/*
* In E_FORMAT there is always one significant digit in front
* of the decimal point, so:
* significant digits == 1 + decimal places
*/
max--;
}
}
if (realstyle == E_FORMAT)
fvalue = tmpvalue;
}
ufvalue = abs_val(fvalue);
if (ufvalue > ULONG_MAX) {
/* Number too big */
return 0;
}
intpart = (unsigned long)ufvalue;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/*
* sorry, we only support 9 digits past the decimal because of our
* conversion method
*/
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (max > 9)
max = 9;
/*
* we "cheat" by converting the fractional part to integer by multiplying
* by a factor of 10
*/
max10 = roundv(pow_10(max));
fracpart = roundv(pow_10(max) * (ufvalue - intpart));
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
if (fracpart >= max10) {
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
intpart++;
fracpart -= max10;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/* convert integer part */
do {
iconvert[iplace++] = "0123456789"[intpart % 10];
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
intpart = (intpart / 10);
} while (intpart && (iplace < (int)sizeof(iconvert)));
if (iplace == sizeof iconvert)
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
iplace--;
iconvert[iplace] = 0;
/* convert fractional part */
while (fplace < max) {
if (style == G_FORMAT && fplace == 0 && (fracpart % 10) == 0) {
/* We strip trailing zeros in G_FORMAT */
max--;
fracpart = fracpart / 10;
if (fplace < max)
continue;
break;
}
fconvert[fplace++] = "0123456789"[fracpart % 10];
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
fracpart = (fracpart / 10);
}
if (fplace == sizeof fconvert)
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
fplace--;
fconvert[fplace] = 0;
/* convert exponent part */
if (realstyle == E_FORMAT) {
int tmpexp;
if (exp < 0)
tmpexp = -exp;
else
tmpexp = exp;
do {
econvert[eplace++] = "0123456789"[tmpexp % 10];
tmpexp = (tmpexp / 10);
} while (tmpexp > 0 && eplace < (int)sizeof(econvert));
/* Exponent is huge!! Too big to print */
if (tmpexp > 0)
return 0;
/* Add a leading 0 for single digit exponents */
if (eplace == 1)
econvert[eplace++] = '0';
}
/*
* -1 for decimal point (if we have one, i.e. max > 0),
* another -1 if we are printing a sign
*/
padlen = min - iplace - max - (max > 0 ? 1 : 0) - ((signvalue) ? 1 : 0);
/* Take some off for exponent prefix "+e" and exponent */
if (realstyle == E_FORMAT)
padlen -= 2 + eplace;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
zpadlen = max - fplace;
if (zpadlen < 0)
zpadlen = 0;
if (padlen < 0)
padlen = 0;
if (flags & DP_F_MINUS)
padlen = -padlen;
if ((flags & DP_F_ZERO) && (padlen > 0)) {
if (signvalue) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, signvalue))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--padlen;
signvalue = 0;
}
while (padlen > 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '0'))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--padlen;
}
}
while (padlen > 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--padlen;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (signvalue && !doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, signvalue))
return 0;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
while (iplace > 0) {
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, iconvert[--iplace]))
return 0;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
/*
* Decimal point. This should probably use locale to find the correct
* char to print out.
*/
if (max > 0 || (flags & DP_F_NUM)) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '.'))
return 0;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
while (fplace > 0) {
if(!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen,
fconvert[--fplace]))
return 0;
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
}
while (zpadlen > 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '0'))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
--zpadlen;
}
if (realstyle == E_FORMAT) {
char ech;
if ((flags & DP_F_UP) == 0)
ech = 'e';
else
ech = 'E';
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ech))
return 0;
if (exp < 0) {
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '-'))
return 0;
} else {
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, '+'))
return 0;
}
while (eplace > 0) {
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen,
econvert[--eplace]))
return 0;
}
}
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
while (padlen < 0) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!doapr_outch(sbuffer, buffer, currlen, maxlen, ' '))
return 0;
2000-02-25 14:00:24 +00:00
++padlen;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 1;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
#define BUFFER_INC 1024
static int
doapr_outch(char **sbuffer,
char **buffer, size_t *currlen, size_t *maxlen, int c)
{
/* If we haven't at least one buffer, someone has doe a big booboo */
OPENSSL_assert(*sbuffer != NULL || buffer != NULL);
/* |currlen| must always be <= |*maxlen| */
OPENSSL_assert(*currlen <= *maxlen);
if (buffer && *currlen == *maxlen) {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (*maxlen > INT_MAX - BUFFER_INC)
return 0;
*maxlen += BUFFER_INC;
if (*buffer == NULL) {
*buffer = OPENSSL_malloc(*maxlen);
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (*buffer == NULL)
return 0;
if (*currlen > 0) {
OPENSSL_assert(*sbuffer != NULL);
memcpy(*buffer, *sbuffer, *currlen);
}
*sbuffer = NULL;
} else {
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
char *tmpbuf;
tmpbuf = OPENSSL_realloc(*buffer, *maxlen);
if (tmpbuf == NULL)
return 0;
*buffer = tmpbuf;
}
}
if (*currlen < *maxlen) {
if (*sbuffer)
(*sbuffer)[(*currlen)++] = (char)c;
else
(*buffer)[(*currlen)++] = (char)c;
}
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
return 1;
}
2000-04-14 23:36:15 +00:00
/***************************************************************************/
int BIO_printf(BIO *bio, const char *format, ...)
{
va_list args;
int ret;
va_start(args, format);
ret = BIO_vprintf(bio, format, args);
va_end(args);
return (ret);
}
int BIO_vprintf(BIO *bio, const char *format, va_list args)
{
int ret;
size_t retlen;
char hugebuf[1024 * 2]; /* Was previously 10k, which is unreasonable
* in small-stack environments, like threads
* or DOS programs. */
char *hugebufp = hugebuf;
size_t hugebufsize = sizeof(hugebuf);
char *dynbuf = NULL;
int ignored;
dynbuf = NULL;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if (!_dopr(&hugebufp, &dynbuf, &hugebufsize, &retlen, &ignored, format,
args)) {
OPENSSL_free(dynbuf);
return -1;
}
if (dynbuf) {
ret = BIO_write(bio, dynbuf, (int)retlen);
OPENSSL_free(dynbuf);
} else {
ret = BIO_write(bio, hugebuf, (int)retlen);
}
return (ret);
}
/*
* As snprintf is not available everywhere, we provide our own
* implementation. This function has nothing to do with BIOs, but it's
* closely related to BIO_printf, and we need *some* name prefix ... (XXX the
* function should be renamed, but to what?)
*/
2000-04-14 23:36:15 +00:00
int BIO_snprintf(char *buf, size_t n, const char *format, ...)
{
va_list args;
int ret;
va_start(args, format);
ret = BIO_vsnprintf(buf, n, format, args);
va_end(args);
return (ret);
}
int BIO_vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t n, const char *format, va_list args)
{
size_t retlen;
int truncated;
Fix memory issues in BIO_*printf functions The internal |fmtstr| function used in processing a "%s" format string in the BIO_*printf functions could overflow while calculating the length of a string and cause an OOB read when printing very long strings. Additionally the internal |doapr_outch| function can attempt to write to an OOB memory location (at an offset from the NULL pointer) in the event of a memory allocation failure. In 1.0.2 and below this could be caused where the size of a buffer to be allocated is greater than INT_MAX. E.g. this could be in processing a very long "%s" format string. Memory leaks can also occur. These issues will only occur on certain platforms where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int). E.g. many 64 bit systems. The first issue may mask the second issue dependent on compiler behaviour. These problems could enable attacks where large amounts of untrusted data is passed to the BIO_*printf functions. If applications use these functions in this way then they could be vulnerable. OpenSSL itself uses these functions when printing out human-readable dumps of ASN.1 data. Therefore applications that print this data could be vulnerable if the data is from untrusted sources. OpenSSL command line applications could also be vulnerable where they print out ASN.1 data, or if untrusted data is passed as command line arguments. Libssl is not considered directly vulnerable. Additionally certificates etc received via remote connections via libssl are also unlikely to be able to trigger these issues because of message size limits enforced within libssl. CVE-2016-0799 Issue reported by Guido Vranken. Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
2016-02-25 13:09:46 +00:00
if(!_dopr(&buf, NULL, &n, &retlen, &truncated, format, args))
return -1;
if (truncated)
/*
* In case of truncation, return -1 like traditional snprintf.
* (Current drafts for ISO/IEC 9899 say snprintf should return the
* number of characters that would have been written, had the buffer
* been large enough.)
*/
return -1;
else
return (retlen <= INT_MAX) ? (int)retlen : -1;
}