Timing vulnerability in DSA signature generation (CVE-2018-0734).
Avoid a timing attack that leaks information via a side channel that
triggers when a BN is resized. Increasing the size of the BNs
prior to doing anything with them suppresses the attack.
Thanks due to Samuel Weiser for finding and locating this.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7486)
(cherry picked from commit a9cfb8c2aa
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1b12b8713
commit
8abfe72e8c
1 changed files with 15 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||||
#include "internal/cryptlib.h"
|
||||
#include "internal/bn_int.h"
|
||||
#include <openssl/bn.h>
|
||||
#include <openssl/sha.h>
|
||||
#include "dsa_locl.h"
|
||||
|
@ -180,9 +181,9 @@ static int dsa_sign_setup(DSA *dsa, BN_CTX *ctx_in,
|
|||
{
|
||||
BN_CTX *ctx = NULL;
|
||||
BIGNUM *k, *kinv = NULL, *r = *rp;
|
||||
BIGNUM *l, *m;
|
||||
BIGNUM *l;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
int q_bits;
|
||||
int q_bits, q_words;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dsa->p || !dsa->q || !dsa->g) {
|
||||
DSAerr(DSA_F_DSA_SIGN_SETUP, DSA_R_MISSING_PARAMETERS);
|
||||
|
@ -191,8 +192,7 @@ static int dsa_sign_setup(DSA *dsa, BN_CTX *ctx_in,
|
|||
|
||||
k = BN_new();
|
||||
l = BN_new();
|
||||
m = BN_new();
|
||||
if (k == NULL || l == NULL || m == NULL)
|
||||
if (k == NULL || l == NULL)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctx_in == NULL) {
|
||||
|
@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ static int dsa_sign_setup(DSA *dsa, BN_CTX *ctx_in,
|
|||
|
||||
/* Preallocate space */
|
||||
q_bits = BN_num_bits(dsa->q);
|
||||
if (!BN_set_bit(k, q_bits)
|
||||
|| !BN_set_bit(l, q_bits)
|
||||
|| !BN_set_bit(m, q_bits))
|
||||
q_words = bn_get_top(dsa->q);
|
||||
if (!bn_wexpand(k, q_words + 2)
|
||||
|| !bn_wexpand(l, q_words + 2))
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get random k */
|
||||
|
@ -240,14 +240,17 @@ static int dsa_sign_setup(DSA *dsa, BN_CTX *ctx_in,
|
|||
* small timing information leakage. We then choose the sum that is
|
||||
* one bit longer than the modulus.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* TODO: revisit the BN_copy aiming for a memory access agnostic
|
||||
* conditional copy.
|
||||
* There are some concerns about the efficacy of doing this. More
|
||||
* specificly refer to the discussion starting with:
|
||||
* https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7486#discussion_r228323705
|
||||
* The fix is to rework BN so these gymnastics aren't required.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!BN_add(l, k, dsa->q)
|
||||
|| !BN_add(m, l, dsa->q)
|
||||
|| !BN_copy(k, BN_num_bits(l) > q_bits ? l : m))
|
||||
|| !BN_add(k, l, dsa->q))
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
|
||||
BN_consttime_swap(BN_is_bit_set(l, q_bits), k, l, q_words + 2);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((dsa)->meth->bn_mod_exp != NULL) {
|
||||
if (!dsa->meth->bn_mod_exp(dsa, r, dsa->g, k, dsa->p, ctx,
|
||||
dsa->method_mont_p))
|
||||
|
@ -275,7 +278,6 @@ static int dsa_sign_setup(DSA *dsa, BN_CTX *ctx_in,
|
|||
BN_CTX_free(ctx);
|
||||
BN_clear_free(k);
|
||||
BN_clear_free(l);
|
||||
BN_clear_free(m);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue