Configurations/*.conf: overhaul Android targets.

Move Android targets to separate file, automate sysroot setup and
add support for NDK 16.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5589)
This commit is contained in:
Andy Polyakov 2018-03-11 19:08:56 +01:00
parent b3e02d06ba
commit ebea0f3014
2 changed files with 214 additions and 93 deletions

View file

@ -940,99 +940,6 @@ my %targets = (
ranlib => "true",
},
#### Android: linux-* but without pointers to headers and libs.
#
# It takes pair of prior-set environment variables to make it work:
#
# CROSS_SYSROOT=/some/where/android-ndk-<ver>/platforms/android-<apiver>/arch-<arch>
# CROSS_COMPILE=<prefix>
#
# As well as PATH adjusted to cover ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc and company.
# For example to compile for ICS and ARM with NDK 10d, you'd:
#
# ANDROID_NDK=/some/where/android-ndk-10d
# CROSS_SYSROOT=$ANDROID_NDK/platforms/android-14/arch-arm
# CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-androideabi-
# PATH=$ANDROID_NDK/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.8/prebuild/linux-x86_64/bin
#
"android" => {
inherit_from => [ "linux-generic32" ],
# Special note about unconditional -fPIC and -pie. The underlying
# reason is that Lollipop refuses to run non-PIE. But what about
# older systems and NDKs? -fPIC was never problem, so the only
# concern is -pie. Older toolchains, e.g. r4, appear to handle it
# and binaries turn mostly functional. "Mostly" means that oldest
# Androids, such as Froyo, fail to handle executable, but newer
# systems are perfectly capable of executing binaries targeting
# Froyo. Keep in mind that in the nutshell Android builds are
# about JNI, i.e. shared libraries, not applications.
cflags => add("-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack"),
cxxflags => add("-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack"),
bin_cflags => "-pie",
},
"android-x86" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("x86_asm") ],
CFLAGS => add(picker(release => "-fomit-frame-pointer")),
bn_ops => "BN_LLONG",
perlasm_scheme => "android",
},
################################################################
# Contemporary Android applications can provide multiple JNI
# providers in .apk, targeting multiple architectures. Among
# them there is "place" for two ARM flavours: generic eabi and
# armv7-a/hard-float. However, it should be noted that OpenSSL's
# ability to engage NEON is not constrained by ABI choice, nor
# is your ability to call OpenSSL from your application code
# compiled with floating-point ABI other than default 'soft'.
# [Latter thanks to __attribute__((pcs("aapcs"))) declaration.]
# This means that choice of ARM libraries you provide in .apk
# is driven by application needs. For example if application
# itself benefits from NEON or is floating-point intensive, then
# it might be appropriate to provide both libraries. Otherwise
# just generic eabi would do. But in latter case it would be
# appropriate to
#
# ./Configure android-armeabi -D__ARM_MAX_ARCH__=8
#
# in order to build "universal" binary and allow OpenSSL take
# advantage of NEON when it's available.
#
"android-armeabi" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("armv4_asm") ],
},
"android-mips" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("mips32_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "o32",
},
"android64" => {
inherit_from => [ "linux-generic64" ],
cflags => add("-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack"),
cxxflags => add("-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack"),
bin_cflags => "-pie",
},
"android64-aarch64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("aarch64_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "linux64",
},
"android64-x86_64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("x86_64_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "elf",
},
"android64-mips64" => {
############################################################
# You are more than likely have to specify target processor
# on ./Configure command line. Trouble is that toolchain's
# default is MIPS64r6 (at least in r10d), but there are no
# such processors around (or they are too rare to spot one).
# Actual problem is that MIPS64r6 is binary incompatible
# with previous MIPS ISA versions, in sense that unlike
# prior versions original MIPS binary code will fail.
#
inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("mips64_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "64",
},
#### *BSD
"BSD-generic32" => {
# As for thread cflag. Idea is to maintain "collective" set of

View file

@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
#### Android...
#
# It takes *one* prior-set environment variable to make it work:
#
# ANDROID_NDK=/some/where/android-ndk-<ver>
#
# As well as PATH *adjusted* to cover ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc and company.
#
# Note that it's different from original instructions that required to
# set CROSS_SYSROOT [to $ANDROID_NDK/platforms/android-<api>/arch-<arch>]
# and CROSS_COMPILE. CROSS_SYSROOT is still recognized [and even required
# for some legacy targets], but if not set, it's detected and set to the
# latest Android platform available with appointed NDK automatically. If
# you need to target older platform, pass additional -D__ANDROID_API__=N
# to Configure. For example, to compile for ICS on ARM with NDK 10d:
#
# ANDROID_NDK=/some/where/android-ndk-10d
# PATH=$ANDROID_NDK/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.8/prebuild/linux-x86_64/bin:$PATH
# [..]./Configure android-arm -D__ANDROID_API__=14
#
# One can engage clang by passing CC=clang to Configure. In such case
# PATH needs even more adjustments to cover NDK's clang itself, as well
# as unprefixed, yet target-specific ar and ranlib [or not, if you use
# binutils-multiarch].
{
my $android_ndk = {};
my %triplet = (
arm => "arm-linux-androideabi",
arm64 => "aarch64-linux-android",
mips => "mipsel-linux-android",
mips64 => "mips64el-linux-android",
x86 => "i686-linux-android",
x86_64 => "x86_64-linux-android",
);
sub android_ndk {
unless (%$android_ndk) {
my $ndk = $ENV{ANDROID_NDK};
die "\$ANDROID_NDK is not defined" if (!$ndk);
die "\$ANDROID_NDK=$ndk is invalid" if (!-d "$ndk/platforms");
my $sysroot;
if (!($sysroot = $ENV{CROSS_SYSROOT})) {
my $api = "*";
# see if user passed -D__ANDROID_API__=N
foreach (@{$useradd{CPPDEFINES}}) {
if (m|__ANDROID_API__=([0-9]+)|) {
$api = $1;
last;
}
}
# list available platforms [numerically]
my @platforms = sort { $a =~ m/-([0-9]+)$/; my $aa = $1;
$b =~ m/-([0-9]+)$/; $aa <=> $1;
} glob("$ndk/platforms/android-$api");
die "no $ndk/platforms/android-$api" if ($#platforms < 0);
$config{target} =~ m|[^-]+-([^-]+)$|; # split on dash
$sysroot = "@platforms[$#platforms]/arch-$1";
}
die "no sysroot=$sysroot" if (!-d $sysroot);
$sysroot =~ m|/android-([0-9]+)/arch-(\w+)/?$|;
my ($api, $arch) = ($1, $2);
my $triarch = $triplet{$arch};
my $cflags = "-Wa,--noexecstack";
my $cppflags;
# see if user passed CC=clang
if ($user{CC} eq "clang") {
if (which("clang") !~ m|^$ndk/.*/prebuilt/([^/]+)/|) {
die "no NDK clang on \$PATH";
}
# harmonize with gcc default
(my $tridefault = $triarch) =~ s|^arm-|armv5te-|;
$cflags .= " -target $tridefault -gcc-toolchain "
. "\$(ANDROID_NDK)/toolchains/$triarch-4.9/prebuilt/$1";
$user{CROSS_COMPILE} = undef;
} else {
$cflags .= " -mandroid";
$user{CROSS_COMPILE} = "$triarch-";
}
if (!-d "$sysroot/usr/include") {
my $incroot = "$ndk/sysroot/usr/include";
die "no $incroot" if (!-d $incroot);
die "no $incroot/$triarch" if (!-d "$incroot/$triarch");
$incroot =~ s|^$ndk/||;
$cppflags = "-D__ANDROID_API__=$api";
$cppflags .= " -isystem \$(ANDROID_NDK)/$incroot/$triarch";
$cppflags .= " -isystem \$(ANDROID_NDK)/$incroot";
}
$sysroot =~ s|^$ndk/||;
$android_ndk = {
cflags => "$cflags --sysroot=\$(ANDROID_NDK)/$sysroot",
cppflags => $cppflags,
bn_ops => $arch =~ m/64$/ ? "SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG"
: "BN_LLONG",
};
}
return $android_ndk;
}
}
my %targets = (
"android" => {
inherit_from => [ "linux-generic32" ],
template => 1,
################################################################
# Special note about -pie. The underlying reason is that
# Lollipop refuses to run non-PIE. But what about older systems
# and NDKs? -fPIC was never problem, so the only concern is -pie.
# Older toolchains, e.g. r4, appear to handle it and binaries
# turn out mostly functional. "Mostly" means that oldest
# Androids, such as Froyo, fail to handle executable, but newer
# systems are perfectly capable of executing binaries targeting
# Froyo. Keep in mind that in the nutshell Android builds are
# about JNI, i.e. shared libraries, not applications.
cflags => add(sub { android_ndk()->{cflags} }),
cppflags => add(sub { android_ndk()->{cppflags} }),
cxxflags => add(sub { android_ndk()->{cflags} }),
bn_ops => sub { android_ndk()->{bn_ops} },
bin_cflags => "-pie",
},
"android-arm" => {
################################################################
# Contemporary Android applications can provide multiple JNI
# providers in .apk, targeting multiple architectures. Among
# them there is "place" for two ARM flavours: generic eabi and
# armv7-a/hard-float. However, it should be noted that OpenSSL's
# ability to engage NEON is not constrained by ABI choice, nor
# is your ability to call OpenSSL from your application code
# compiled with floating-point ABI other than default 'soft'.
# [Latter thanks to __attribute__((pcs("aapcs"))) declaration.]
# This means that choice of ARM libraries you provide in .apk
# is driven by application needs. For example if application
# itself benefits from NEON or is floating-point intensive, then
# it might be appropriate to provide both libraries. Otherwise
# just generic eabi would do. But in latter case it would be
# appropriate to
#
# ./Configure android-arm -D__ARM_MAX_ARCH__=8
#
# in order to build "universal" binary and allow OpenSSL take
# advantage of NEON when it's available.
#
# Keep in mind that [just like with linux-armv4] we rely on
# compiler defaults, which is not necessarily what you had
# in mind, in which case you would have to pass additional
# -march and/or -mfloat-abi flags. NDK defaults to armv5te.
#
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("armv4_asm") ],
},
"android-arm64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("aarch64_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "linux64",
},
"android-mips" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("mips32_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "o32",
},
"android-mips64" => {
################################################################
# You are more than likely have to specify target processor
# on ./Configure command line. Trouble is that toolchain's
# default is MIPS64r6 (at least in r10d), but there are no
# such processors around (or they are too rare to spot one).
# Actual problem is that MIPS64r6 is binary incompatible
# with previous MIPS ISA versions, in sense that unlike
# prior versions original MIPS binary code will fail.
#
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("mips64_asm") ],
perlasm_scheme => "64",
},
"android-x86" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("x86_asm") ],
CFLAGS => add(picker(release => "-fomit-frame-pointer")),
bn_ops => add("RC4_INT"),
perlasm_scheme => "android",
},
"android-x86_64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android", asm("x86_64_asm") ],
bn_ops => add("RC4_INT"),
perlasm_scheme => "elf",
},
####################################################################
# Backward compatible targets, [might] requre $CROSS_SYSROOT
#
"android-armeabi" => {
inherit_from => [ "android-arm" ],
},
"android64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android" ],
},
"android64-aarch64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android-arm64" ],
},
"android64-x86_64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android-x86_64" ],
},
"android64-mips64" => {
inherit_from => [ "android-mips64" ],
},
);