test/params_api_test.c: fix size_t assumptions
size_t isn't always as large as a int64_t, so the compiler complains about possible data loss. In this case, we are in control, so a simple cast will do. Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8497)
This commit is contained in:
parent
16161a30f2
commit
f7f2a55aee
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ static int test_param_type_extra(const OSSL_PARAM *param, unsigned char *cmp,
|
|||
if (signd) {
|
||||
if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_set_int32(param, 12345))
|
||||
|| !TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_int64(param, &i64))
|
||||
|| !TEST_size_t_eq(i64, 12345))
|
||||
|| !TEST_size_t_eq((size_t)i64, 12345))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_set_uint32(param, 12345))
|
||||
|| !TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_uint64(param, (uint64_t *)&i64))
|
||||
|| !TEST_size_t_eq(i64, 12345))
|
||||
|| !TEST_size_t_eq((size_t)i64, 12345))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue