With this change, the following is provided and present at all times
(meaning CRYPTO_MDEBUG is no longer required to get this functionality):
- hooks to provide your own allocation and deallocation routines.
They have to have the same interface as malloc(), realloc() and
free(). They are registered by calling CRYPTO_set_mem_functions()
with the function pointers.
- hooks to provide your own memory debugging routines. The have to
have the same interface as as the CRYPTO_dbg_*() routines. They
are registered by calling CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions() with
the function pointers.
I moved everything that was already built into OpenSSL and did memory
debugging to a separate file (mem_dbg.c), to make it clear what is
what.
With this, the relevance of the CRYPTO_MDEBUG has changed. The only
thing in crypto/crypto.h that it affects is the definition of the
MemCheck_start and MemCheck_stop macros.
1. Added code to the memory leak detecting code to give the user the
possibility to add information, thereby forming a traceback.
2. Make the memory leak detecting code multithread-safe.
The idea is that we're actually dealing with two separate critical
sections, one containing the hash tables with the information, the
other containing the current memory checking mode. Those should not
be handled with the same lock, especially since their handling overlap.
Hence, the added second lock.
thread-safe (where thread-safe counterparts are not available on all
platforms), and don't memcpy to NULL-pointers
Submitted by: Anonymous
Reviewed by: Bodo Moeller
Also, clean up htons vs. ntohs confusions.
While modifying the sources, I found some inconsistencies on the use of
s->cert vs. s->session->sess_cert; I don't know if those could
really have caused problems, but possibly this is a proper bug-fix
and not just a clean-up.
script, translates function codes better and doesn't need the K&R function
prototypes to work (NB. the K&R prototypes can't be wiped just yet: they are
still needed by the DEF generator...). I also ran the script with the -rewrite
option to update all the header and source files.
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b
2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
.2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
