wbrawner/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
1664 commits 20 branches 302 tags 153 MiB
Commit graph

87 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bodo Möller
dd5ae70333 Submitted by: 
Reviewed by:
PR:
 1999-04-13 02:32:38 +00:00
Ulf Möller
5fbe91d86b New Configure option "rsaref". 1999-04-13 00:58:49 +00:00
Ulf Möller
acafc0b4ae Bugs. 1999-04-08 20:45:53 +00:00
Bodo Möller
3f90e6793f New "open issue" (ERR_...). 
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
 1999-04-08 20:29:19 +00:00
Bodo Möller
fa3da3cf09 Be more optimistic about the availability of termios for ~ECHO, 
because sgtty emulation tends to fail on various systems.
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
 1999-04-08 17:10:27 +00:00
Ulf Möller
1ad86e8e7d bn_div_words has been added to alpha.s (Hannes Reinecke's patch). 1999-04-07 23:37:33 +00:00
Ulf Möller
f4371a650a More assembler problems; new OCSP patch; obsolete patches removed from 
list.
 1999-04-07 17:31:11 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
ee0508d411 Include pkcs12 program as part of openssl. This completes most of the PKCS#12 
integration.
 1999-03-29 17:50:26 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
67d5ac039f Various PKCS#12 related tidies and fixes: it might even compile now :-) 1999-03-29 00:19:55 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
85b283fff5 Update after release... 1999-03-23 14:48:59 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
199d59e5a1 Remove some references which called malloc and free instead of Malloc and Free. 1999-03-14 01:16:45 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
035eb85d2f Update 1999-03-10 16:17:31 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
f11f8d580e Update platform test list 1999-03-10 14:53:54 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
defba77f39 Two more things we should look at before release 1999-03-10 14:50:28 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
38ef9a0c70 Update to current state... 1999-03-09 15:36:53 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
d4d2f98c59 Comment out two unimplemented functions from bio.h. Attempt to get the 
Win32 test batch file going again.
 1999-03-09 03:01:48 +00:00
Ben Laurie
6420b77fec test. 1999-03-08 21:56:46 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
cdb8115660 Solaris 2.6 makes still problems. 
Details were posted.
 1999-03-08 12:56:07 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
6b50354041 typo 1999-03-08 12:39:41 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
54d9976c79 Let us start with some platform test list... 1999-03-08 12:13:35 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a5e035b54a Notice freeze state and update my entry 1999-03-08 09:43:53 +00:00
Ben Laurie
726bae3f0f Supper's cooking. 1999-02-28 20:51:38 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
090db4f475 Remember one more wish from the users 1999-02-25 14:44:55 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
189b6a6062 Remember some open issues and available patches 1999-02-21 12:33:58 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a67a9694f7 Ok, propose a release date of March 15th with a code freeze a few days before 
so we have enough time for final testing and tarball rolling.
 1999-02-20 16:50:53 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
d5083e0142 What is on my ToDo list... 1999-02-10 09:47:05 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
6ccec43933 add what I'm doing and a vote 
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
 1999-02-01 08:18:31 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
679ab7c39e Update STATUS, modify ssl.h so mkdef.pl will pick up prototypes and 
add x509v3.h to mkdef.pl list of include files.
 1999-01-30 17:35:01 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
4c441f30bb Update 1999-01-30 12:06:16 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
69d1dfba24 Start keeping track of wishes people make on our mailing lists to make sure we 
don't forget them and this way we have them bundled together.
 1999-01-21 13:01:20 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
2ec077d87e A few train of thoughts about the build procedure mess 1999-01-02 16:28:51 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
96e479e360 cleanup of apps/ and an answer 1999-01-01 15:58:14 +00:00
Paul C. Sutton
68a8a41bef Add votes 1999-01-01 14:13:59 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
c1374a7dc0 A hint about the license 1998-12-31 12:52:23 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a6f20a1e01 Some issues for voting 1998-12-31 12:14:27 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
9cb0969f65 Fix version stuff: 
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b

2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
   first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
   0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
   VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
   .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 1998-12-31 09:36:40 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
75b8dfc068 Create a STATUS file to coordinate us. Feel free to edit 1998-12-30 09:08:05 +00:00