Because the operation identity wasn't integrated with the created
methods, the following code would give unexpected results:
EVP_MD *md = EVP_MD_fetch(NULL, "MD5", NULL);
EVP_CIPHER *cipher = EVP_CIPHER_fetch(NULL, "MD5", NULL);
if (md != NULL)
printf("MD5 is a digest\n");
if (cipher != NULL)
printf("MD5 is a cipher\n");
The message is that MD5 is both a digest and a cipher.
Partially fixes#9106
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9109)
Move digest code into the relevant providers (fips, default, legacy).
The headers are temporarily moved to be internal, and will be moved
into providers after all external references are resolved. The deprecated
digest code can not be removed until EVP_PKEY (signing) is supported by
providers. EVP_MD data can also not yet be cleaned up for the same reasons.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8763)
We didn't deal very well with names that didn't have pre-defined NIDs,
as the NID zero travelled through the full process and resulted in an
inaccessible method. By consequence, we need to refactor the method
construction callbacks to rely more on algorithm names.
We must, however, still store the legacy NID with the method, for the
sake of other code that depend on it (for example, CMS).
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8878)
Various core and property related code files used global data. We should
store all of that in an OPENSSL_CTX instead.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8857)
When we attempt to fetch a method with a given NID we will ask the
providers for it if we don't already know about it. During that process
we may be told about other methods with a different NID. We need to
make sure we don't confuse the two.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8541)
Fully assume that the method constructors use reference counting.
Otherwise, we may leak memory, or loose track and do a double free.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8341)
All relevant OSSL_METHOD_CONSTRUCT_METHOD callbacks got the callback
data passed to them, except 'destruct'. There's no reason why it
shouldn't get that pointer passed, so we make a small adjustment.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8341)
This queries the provider for its available functionality (unless a
matching method structured is already cached, in which case that's
used instead), and creates method structure with the help of a passed
constructor. The result is cached if the provider allows it (or if
caching is forced).
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8340)
