Sometimes it fails to format them very well, and sometimes it corrupts them!
This commit moves some particularly problematic ones.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
This is actually ok for this function, but initialised to zero anyway if
PURIFY defined.
This does have the impact of masking any *real* unitialised data reads in bn though.
Patch based on approach suggested by Rich Salz.
PR#3415
Fix for the attack described in the paper "Recovering OpenSSL
ECDSA Nonces Using the FLUSH+RELOAD Cache Side-channel Attack"
by Yuval Yarom and Naomi Benger. Details can be obtained from:
http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/140
Thanks to Yuval Yarom and Naomi Benger for discovering this
flaw and to Yuval Yarom for supplying a fix.
(cherry picked from commit 2198be3483)
Conflicts:
CHANGES
knock-on work than expected - they've been extracted into a patch
series that can be completed elsewhere, or in a different branch,
before merging back to HEAD.
- Remove unused and unuseful debug cruft.
- Remove unnecessary 'top' fudging from BN_copy().
- Fix a potential memory leak and simplify the expansion logic in
BN_bin2bn().
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
Yet another question: some time ago you changed BN_set_word.
Why didn't you change BN_get_word as well?
Quite. I'm also removing the older commented-out implementations to improve
readability. This complex stuff seems to date from a time when the types
didn't match up well.
Submitted by: Nils Larsch, Geoff Thorpe
- Remove some unnecessary "+1"-like fudges. Sizes should be handled
exactly, as enlarging size parameters causes needless bloat and may just
make bugs less likely rather than fixing them: bn_expand() macro,
bn_expand_internal(), and BN_sqr().
- Deprecate bn_dup_expand() - it's new since 0.9.7, unused, and not that
useful.
- Remove unnecessary zeroing of unused bytes in bn_expand2().
- Rewrite BN_set_word() - it should be much simpler, the previous
complexities probably date from old mismatched type issues.
- Add missing bn_check_top() macros in bn_word.c
- Improve some degenerate case handling in BN_[add|sub]_word(), add
comments, and avoid a bignum expansion if an overflow isn't possible.
Use BUF_strlcat() instead of strcat().
Use BIO_snprintf() instead of sprintf().
In some cases, keep better track of buffer lengths.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
- Add missing bn_check_top() calls and relocate some others
- Use BN_is_zero() where appropriate
- Remove assert()s that bn_check_top() is already covering
- Simplify the code in places (esp. bn_expand2())
- Only keep ambiguous zero handling if BN_STRICT isn't defined
- Remove some white-space and make some other aesthetic tweaks
once in the source (where it is set for the benefit of no other code
whatsoever). I've deprecated the declaration in the header and likewise
made the use of the flag conditional in bn_lib.c. Note, this change also
NULLs the 'd' pointer in a BIGNUM when it is reset but not deallocated.
constant BIGNUMs. It turns out that this trips up different but equally
useful compiler warnings to -Wcast-qual, and so wasn't worth the ugliness
it created. (Thanks to Ulf for the forehead-slap.)
and structures as constant without having to cast away const at any point.
There is still plenty of other code that makes gcc's "-Wcast-qual" unhappy,
but crypto/bn/ is now ok. Purists are welcome to suggest alternatives.
structures being passed in to or out of API functions, and this corrects a
couple of cases found so far.
Also, lop off a couple of bytes of white-space.
I have tried to convert 'len' type variable declarations to unsigned as a
means to address these warnings when appropriate, but when in doubt I have
used casts in the comparisons instead. The better solution (that would get
us all lynched by API users) would be to go through and convert all the
function prototypes and structure definitions to use unsigned variables
except when signed is necessary. The proliferation of (signed) "int" for
strictly non-negative uses is unfortunate.
happens reliably, even if the BIGNUM is already sufficiently large.
[Note that the bn_expand()/bn_wexpand() macros call bn_expand2() only
if the BIGNUM actually has to grow, so this change does not add any
new overhead as currently bn_expand2() is never called directly.]
This caused a segmentation fault in calls to malloc, so I cleaned up
bn_lib.c a little so that it is easier to see what is going on.
The bug turned out to be an off-by-one error in BN_bin2bn.
two functions that did expansion on in parameters (BN_mul() and
BN_sqr()). The problem was solved by making bn_dup_expand() which is
a mix of bn_expand2() and BN_dup().
like Malloc, Realloc and especially Free conflict with already existing names
on some operating systems or other packages. That is reason enough to change
the names of the OpenSSL memory allocation macros to something that has a
better chance of being unique, like prepending them with OPENSSL_.
This change includes all the name changes needed throughout all C files.
when they cause the destination to expand.
To see how evil this is try this:
#include <pem.h>
main()
{
BIGNUM *bn = NULL;
int i;
bn = BN_new();
BN_hex2bn(&bn, "FFFFFFFF");
BN_add_word(bn, 1);
printf("Value %s\n", BN_bn2hex(bn));
}
This would typically fail before the patch.
It also screws up if you comment out the BN_hex2bn line above or in any
situation where BN_add_word() causes the number of BN_ULONGs in the result
to change (try doubling the number of FFs).
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b
2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
.2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
