The latest TLS 1.3 draft split the RSA-PSS signature schemes into
two versions that indicate the OID of the RSA key being used.
This forced us to rename the preprocessor defines for the sigalg
values, and the ssl-trace code was not adopted to match, since
it was not enabled int the default build.
Belatedly update the ssl_sigalg_tbl in the trace code to match.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5174)
The check for a duplicate value was reading one entry past
where it was supposed to, getting an uninitialized value.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5172)
We don't need to send this extension in normal operation since
we are our own X.509 library, but add some test cases that force
the extension to be sent and exercise our code to process the extension.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
The new extension is like signature_algorithms, but only for the
signature *on* the certificate we will present to the peer (the
old signature_algorithms extension is still used for signatures that
we *generate*, i.e., those over TLS data structures).
We do not need to generate this extension, since we are the same
implementation as our X.509 stack and can handle the same types
of signatures, but we need to be prepared to receive it, and use the received
information when selecting what certificate to present.
There is a lot of interplay between signature_algorithms_cert and
signature_algorithms, since both affect what certificate we can
use, and thus the resulting signature algorithm used for TLS messages.
So, apply signature_algorithms_cert (if present) as a filter on what
certificates we can consider when choosing a certificate+sigalg
pair.
As part of this addition, we also remove the fallback code that let
keys of type EVP_PKEY_RSA be used to generate RSA-PSS signatures -- the
new rsa_pss_pss_* and rsa_pss_rsae_* signature schemes have pulled
the key type into what is covered by the signature algorithm, so
we should not apply this sort of compatibility workaround.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
These functions can now take both "sig+hash" strings and
algorithm-specific identifiers like "rsa_pss_pss_sha256" that
indicate a particular entry from the TLS signature algorithm
registry.
Also clarify that only the "_list" form allows for the new-style names
(the non-"list" interfaces take sig and hasn NIDs, which cannot
access all of the new-style schemes).
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Our historical SSL{,_CTX}_set_sigalgs() APIs take an array of
NID pairs (hash and signature), and our parser for manually
specifying unified sigalgs (that do not necessarily correspond
to an actual signature+hash pair) was transiting via (the implementation
of) this historical API. The TLS 1.3 draft-23 has introduced
signature schemes that have identical signature type and hash type,
differing only in the (RSA) public key OID, which prevents
the rsa_pss_pss_* schemes from being properly identified and
sent on the wire.
To fix the issue, parse sigalg strings directly into SIGALG_LOOKUP
objects, and pass around an array of uint16 wire protocol values
instead of NID pairs. The old interface is retained for API
compatibility but will become less and less useful with time.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
We now have a split in the signature algorithms codepoint space for
whether the certificate's key is for rsaEncryption or a PSS-specific
key, which should let us get rid of some special-casing that we
previously needed to try to coax rsaEncryption keys into performing PSS.
(This will be done in a subsequent commit.)
Send the new PSS-with-PSS-specific key first in our list, so that
we prefer the new technology to the old one.
We need to update the expected certificate type in one test,
since the "RSA-PSS+SHA256" form now corresponds to a public key
of type rsaEncryption, so we should expect the server certificate
type to be just "RSA". If we want to get a server certificate
type of "RSA-PSS", we need to use a new signature algorithm
that cannot be represented as signature+hash, so add a test for that
as well.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
The getters for min and max proto version wrongly passed NULL instead of
0 as third argument to SSL_ctrl() and SSL_CTX_ctrl(). The third argument
is not used, but the error results in a compiler warning:
warning: passing argument 3 of ‘SSL_CTX_ctrl’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
int v = SSL_CTX_get_max_proto_version(self->ctx);
See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4364
Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5128)
When using the SSL_CTX_get_min_min_version macro while compiling with
-Wall, my compiler rightfully complains about this construction:
warning: passing argument 3 of ‘SSL_CTX_ctrl’ makes integer from
pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
These macro's should use 0, instead of NULL, for the third argument,
like most other SSL_CTX_ctrl 'get' wrappers do.
CLA: trivial
Signed-off-by: Steffan Karger <steffan.karger@fox-it.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5099)
Correct error return value in OCSP_basic_sign().
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4190)
Add a -rsigopt option to the ocsp command that allows signature parameters to be provided for the signing of OCSP responses. The parameters that may be provided to -rsigopt are the same as may be provided to -sigopt in the ca, req, and x509 commands.
This PR also defines a OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function, which functions in the same way as OCSP_basic_sign(), except that it accepts a EVP_MD_CTX rather than a key and digest. The OCSP_basic_sign_ctx() function is used to implement the -rsigopt option in the ocsp command.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4190)
Probably this is the CCS between the first and second ClientHellos. It
should be ignored.
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4435)
This enables sending and receiving of the TLSv1.3 cookie on the server side
as appropriate.
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4435)
This just adds the various extension functions. More changes will be
required to actually use them.
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4435)
We incorrectly assumed that explicit dependencies meant that the
source directory would be added for inclusion. However, if the
dependent file is generated, it's stored in the build directory, and
that should be used for inclusion rather than the source directory.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5153)
This ensures that only one set of includes is associated with each
object file, reagardless of where it's used.
For example, if apps/build.info has this:
SOURCE[openssl]=foo.c
INCLUDE[openssl]=.. ../include
and test/build.info has this:
SOURCE[footest]=../apps/foo.c
INCLUDE[footest]=../include
The inclusion directories used for apps/foo.o would differ depending
on which program's dependencies get generated first in the build file.
With this change, all those INCLUDEs get combined into one set of
inclusion directories tied to the object file.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5153)
Support added for these two digests, available only via the EVP interface.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5093)
EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() would search through standard asn1 methods
first, then those added by the application, which EVP_PKEY_asn1_find()
worked the other way around. Also, EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() didn't
handle aliases.
This change brings EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str() closer to EVP_PKEY_asn1_find().
Fixes#5086
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5137)
Since libssl requires libcrypto and libcrypto.pc already has
Libs.private set exactly the same, there's no reason to repeat it in
libssl.pc.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5134)
Even -pthread gets treated that way. The reason to do this is so it
ends up in 'Libs.private' in libcrypto.pc.
Fixes#3884
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5134)
That inclusion turned out to be completely unnecessary
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5136)
This includes unnecessary use of the top as inclusion directory
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5132)
An index.txt entry which has an empty Subject name field will cause ca
to crash. Therefore check it when we load it to make sure its not empty.
Fixes#5109
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5114)
Misconfiguration (e.g. an empty policy section in the config file) can
lead to an empty Subject. Since certificates should have unique Subjects
this should not be allowed.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5114)
