If p2 == NULL then p1 can get freed twice and a crash could occur.
Issue reported by Shi Lei (Qihoo 360 Inc)
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
- Adjust mkerr.pl to produce the line length we used for source
reformating.
- Have mkerr.pl keep track of preprocessor directive indentation
Among others, do not spuriously throw away a #endif at the end of
header files.
- Make sure mkerr.pl specifies any header inclusion correctly
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Some output difference in crypto/conf/conf_def.h, because the earlier
source reformatting needlessly indented the macro values.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1083)
Also adds 'esc_2254' to the possible command line name options
RT#1466
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit bc77651098)
An if checks the value of |type| to see if it is V_ASN1_VISIBLESTRING
twice. We only need to do it once.
GitHub Issue #656
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2647e2617e)
Some compression related functions in libssl have dummy versions to be
used when compiled with no-comp. However those dummy functions were not
being exported on Windows so they are unusable when dynamically linked.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Originally submitted by Kurt Cancemi <kurt@x64architecture.com>
Closes RT#4533
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 59a56c4cf0)
Per RFC 5246,
Note: this extension is not meaningful for TLS versions prior to 1.2.
Clients MUST NOT offer it if they are offering prior versions.
However, even if clients do offer it, the rules specified in [TLSEXT]
require servers to ignore extensions they do not understand.
Although second sentence would suggest that there would be no interop
problems in always offering the extension, WebRTC has reported issues
with Bouncy Castle on < TLS 1.2 ClientHellos that still include
signature_algorithms. See also
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=4223
RT#4390
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit f7aa318552)
Conflicts:
ssl/ssl_locl.h
BIO_eof() was always returning true when using a BIO pair. It should only
be true if the peer BIO is empty and has been shutdown.
RT#1215
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3105d69535)
The default ASN.1 handling can be used for SEED. This also makes
CMS work with SEED.
PR#4504
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit c0aa8c2748)
Try to set the ASN.1 parameters for CMS encryption even if the IV
length is zero as the underlying cipher should still set the type.
This will correctly result in errors if an attempt is made to use
an unsupported cipher type.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3fd60dc422)
Conflicts:
crypto/cms/cms_enc.c
The name length limit check in x509_name_ex_d2i() includes
the containing structure as well as the actual X509_NAME. This will
cause large CRLs to be rejected.
Fix by limiting the length passed to ASN1_item_ex_d2i() which will
then return an error if the passed X509_NAME exceeds the length.
RT#4531
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4e0d184ac1)
Only treat an ASN1_ANY type as an integer if it has the V_ASN1_INTEGER
tag: V_ASN1_NEG_INTEGER is an internal only value which is never used
for on the wire encoding.
Thanks to David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> for reporting this bug.
This was found using libFuzzer.
RT#4364 (part)CVE-2016-2108.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
With the EVP_EncodeUpdate function it is the caller's responsibility to
determine how big the output buffer should be. The function writes the
amount actually used to |*outl|. However this could go negative with a
sufficiently large value for |inl|. We add a check for this error
condition.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
An overflow can occur in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function which is used for
Base64 encoding of binary data. If an attacker is able to supply very large
amounts of input data then a length check can overflow resulting in a heap
corruption. Due to the very large amounts of data involved this will most
likely result in a crash.
Internally to OpenSSL the EVP_EncodeUpdate function is primarly used by the
PEM_write_bio* family of functions. These are mainly used within the
OpenSSL command line applications, so any application which processes
data from an untrusted source and outputs it as a PEM file should be
considered vulnerable to this issue.
User applications that call these APIs directly with large amounts of
untrusted data may also be vulnerable.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
CVE-2016-2105
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
ASN1 Strings that are over 1024 bytes can cause an overread in
applications using the X509_NAME_oneline() function on EBCDIC systems.
This could result in arbitrary stack data being returned in the buffer.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
CVE-2016-2176
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
An overflow can occur in the EVP_EncryptUpdate function. If an attacker is
able to supply very large amounts of input data after a previous call to
EVP_EncryptUpdate with a partial block then a length check can overflow
resulting in a heap corruption.
Following an analysis of all OpenSSL internal usage of the
EVP_EncryptUpdate function all usage is one of two forms.
The first form is like this:
EVP_EncryptInit()
EVP_EncryptUpdate()
i.e. where the EVP_EncryptUpdate() call is known to be the first called
function after an EVP_EncryptInit(), and therefore that specific call
must be safe.
The second form is where the length passed to EVP_EncryptUpdate() can be
seen from the code to be some small value and therefore there is no
possibility of an overflow.
Since all instances are one of these two forms, I believe that there can
be no overflows in internal code due to this problem.
It should be noted that EVP_DecryptUpdate() can call EVP_EncryptUpdate()
in certain code paths. Also EVP_CipherUpdate() is a synonym for
EVP_EncryptUpdate(). Therefore I have checked all instances of these
calls too, and came to the same conclusion, i.e. there are no instances
in internal usage where an overflow could occur.
This could still represent a security issue for end user code that calls
this function directly.
CVE-2016-2106
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3f3582139f)
