More importantly, port CRL test from boringSSL crypto/x509/x509_test.cc
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1775)
$1<<32>>32 worked fine with either 32- or 64-bit perl for a good while,
relying on quirk that [pure] 32-bit perl performed it as $1<<0>>0. But
this apparently changed in some version past minimally required 5.10,
and operation result became 0. Yet, it went unnoticed for another while,
because most perl package providers configure their packages with
-Duse64bitint option.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
On all platforms, if the controlling tty isn't an actual tty, this is
flagged by setting is_a_tty to zero... except on VMS, where this was
treated as an error. Change this to behave like the other platforms.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2063)
There is code that retries calling RAND_bytes() until it gets something
other than 0, which just hangs if we always return 0.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2041
If on a non-tty stdin, TTY_get() will fail with errno == ENODEV.
We didn't catch that.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2039)
TTY_get() sometimes surprises us with new errno values to determine if
we have a controling terminal or not. This generated error is a
helpful tool to figure out that this was what happened and what the
unknown value is.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2043)
Since there are many parts of UI_process() that can go wrong, it isn't
very helpful to only return -1 with no further explanation. With this
change, the error message will at least show which part went wrong.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2037)
GH issue #1916 affects only big-endian platforms. TLS is not affected,
because TLS fragment is never big enough.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
The bug was introduced in 80d27cdb84,
one too many instructions was removed. It went unnoticed, because
new subroutine introduced in previous commit is called in real-life
RSA/DSA/DH cases, while original code is called only in rare tests.
The bug was caught in test_fuzz.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
It's called with 0 when it's already locked, with 1 when it's not.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1500
In non-__KERNEL__ context 32-bit-style __ARMEB__/__ARMEL__ macros were
set in arm_arch.h, which is shared between 32- and 64-bit builds. Since
it's not included in __KERNEL__ case, we have to adhere to official
64-bit pre-defines, __AARCH64EB__/__AARCH64EL__.
[If we are to share more code, it would need similar adjustment.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Both strdup or malloc failure should raise à err.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1905)
This reflects its position in include/openssl/ct.h.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Otherwise, |dec| gets moved past the end of the signature by
o2i_SCT_signature and then can't be correctly freed afterwards.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Factorise multiple bn_get_top(group->field) calls
Add missing checks on some conditional BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on some BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on a few bn_wexpand return value
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1626)
Do not call the time "current", as a different time can be provided.
For example, a time slightly in the future, to provide tolerance for
CT logs with a clock that is running fast.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)
