wbrawner/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
3614 commits 20 branches 302 tags 153 MiB
Commit graph

43 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Levitte
fcc88e4915 Tagging has been done, move on to develop beta 4 (hopefully not :-)). 2001-03-30 16:22:44 +00:00
Richard Levitte
787f25ab42 Release beta 3 of OpenSSL 0.9.6a. 
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_6a-beta3.
 2001-03-30 12:21:28 +00:00
Richard Levitte
b6282a2004 Tagging has been done (OpenSSL_0_9_6a-beta2), time to move on. 2001-03-21 20:54:52 +00:00
Richard Levitte
f14aa30118 Release OpenSSL 0.9.6a beta2. 2001-03-21 20:37:47 +00:00
Richard Levitte
18c497dffb Tagging has now been done, switch over to development of beta 2. 
The tag for beta 1 is OpenSSL_0_9_6a-beta1.
 2001-03-13 16:29:03 +00:00
Richard Levitte
15922ccdf6 Release Beta 1 of 0.9.6a. 2001-03-13 16:08:32 +00:00
Richard Levitte
eec6e53851 Eh, this branch is not version 0.9.6, it's the development of 0.9.6a. 2001-01-24 16:21:21 +00:00
Richard Levitte
0e8f2fdfdd Time to build the release. Bump the version info accordingly. 2000-09-24 15:21:30 +00:00
Richard Levitte
d40898dfab Time to build beta 3. Bump the version numbers accordingly. 2000-09-21 09:08:44 +00:00
Richard Levitte
a440d6636f A new beta is being released. Change the version numbers 
accordingly.
 2000-09-17 20:19:44 +00:00
Richard Levitte
bed1847b6a Time to release a beta. Change the version numbers and dates 
accordingly.
 2000-09-11 12:31:36 +00:00
Richard Levitte
b436a98257 Redo and enhance the support for building shared libraries. Currently 
there's support for building under Linux and True64 (using examples
from the programming manuals), including versioning that is currently
the same as OpenSSL versions but should really be a different series.

With this change, it's up to the users to decide if they want shared
libraries as well as the static ones.  This decision now has to be
done at configuration time (well, not really, those who know what they
do can still do it the same way as before).

The OpenSSL programs (openssl and the test programs) are currently
always linked statically, but this may change in the future in a
configurable manner.  The necessary makefile variables to enable this
are in place.

Also note that I have done absolutely nothing about the Windows target
to get something similar.  On the other hand, DLLs are already the
default there, but without versioning, and I've no idea what the
possibilities for such a thing are there...
 2000-07-21 15:08:53 +00:00
Richard Levitte
7c6c052e68 Tagging has now been done, update to the next possible version (I keep 
a low profile, so we don't get discontinuity in the numbering...)
 2000-04-01 11:21:14 +00:00
Richard Levitte
561c71a76b Building version 0.9.5a 2000-04-01 11:03:41 +00:00
Richard Levitte
90cc4e29b3 Tagging has been done, update to next probable version... 2000-03-23 21:14:11 +00:00
Richard Levitte
0806278561 Time for version 0.9.5a beta2 
I know it's earlier than announced.  The high amount of problems in
beta1 warants this, however.
 2000-03-23 21:07:41 +00:00
Richard Levitte
c81ccaddad Tagging done, we move to the next possible. 2000-03-20 07:47:37 +00:00
Richard Levitte
3cf4f5d05e Change the version text, it's time to release the first beta of 0.9.5a. 2000-03-20 07:22:47 +00:00
Richard Levitte
e55818b9d3 Change the notation and coding of the version to be able to contain 
both a patch level and a beta status.  IMHO, it also makes more sense
to have beta status be part of the development status than to have it
be an alternate name for patch levels under special conditions.
 2000-03-19 09:35:19 +00:00
Richard Levitte
11750113c6 Tagging has been done, time to switch to 0.9.6-dev. 2000-02-28 12:11:39 +00:00
Richard Levitte
74cdf6f73a Time for a release 2000-02-28 11:59:02 +00:00
Richard Levitte
13bf48c77a For lack of a better name, this is now called 0.9.5beta3-dev until the 
release.
 2000-02-27 11:12:58 +00:00
Richard Levitte
a1a426ea20 Change version string to reflect the release of beta 2. 2000-02-27 11:07:23 +00:00
Bodo Möller
b05c7211cb Clarification. 2000-02-25 07:48:02 +00:00
Bodo Möller
f6de86dc3d Version 0.9.5beta2-dev (so that the next snapshot will not 
claim to be 0.9.5beta1).

(Are the version number examples correct -- the same numerical
code for:
 * 0.9.3beta2-dev 0x00903002
 * 0.9.3beta2     0x00903002
?)
 2000-02-24 20:40:02 +00:00
Richard Levitte
5921ea3bcf 0.9.5beta1 2000-02-24 02:22:15 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
d91e201e96 Bump after tarball rolling. 
Friends, feel free to start again hacking for 0.9.5... ;)
 1999-08-09 11:14:08 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
2c720c746b Bump version to 0.9.4 1999-08-09 10:40:38 +00:00
Ben Laurie
80c38957bc And carry on with development... 1999-05-29 14:18:27 +00:00
Ben Laurie
033d858cc2 Oops! 1999-05-29 14:14:56 +00:00
Ben Laurie
31fab3e8da Prepare to release 0.9.3a 1999-05-29 14:13:15 +00:00
Ben Laurie
767d6bfb87 Move on to 0.9.4. 1999-05-24 20:59:34 +00:00
Ben Laurie
09befa1905 Here we go: prepare to roll 0.9.3. 1999-05-24 20:52:13 +00:00
Ben Laurie
e09632f986 Move to beta 3. 1999-05-23 16:38:07 +00:00
Ben Laurie
24abc46963 Prepare for final(?) beta. 1999-05-23 16:35:29 +00:00
Ben Laurie
60ed228e71 On seconds thoughts, the version number shoud _never_ decrease. 1999-05-20 19:57:53 +00:00
Ben Laurie
c1c96de01c Revert. 1999-05-20 19:46:23 +00:00
Ben Laurie
6b6596202b Prepare for a beta release. 1999-05-20 19:33:46 +00:00
Bodo Möller
06064bb512 Note that the numbering scheme used to be different. 1999-05-19 18:08:35 +00:00
Ben Laurie
e90c772946 Switch to new version numbering scheme. 1999-05-19 17:36:40 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
09ad8001be Protect applications from failing to compile when they 
try to directly include opensslv.h.
 1999-05-18 09:19:28 +00:00
Ulf Möller
6b01fa6490 pre-0.9.3 development version. 1999-04-01 11:58:28 +00:00
Ben Laurie
b4cadc6e13 Fix security hole. 1999-03-22 12:22:14 +00:00