Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5000)
The macros BSWAP4 and BSWAP8 have statetemnt expressions
implementations that use local variable names that shadow variables
outside the macro call, generating warnings like this
e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c:263:14: warning: declaration shadows a local variable
[-Wshadow]
seqnum = BSWAP8(blocks[0].q[0]);
^
../modes/modes_lcl.h:41:29: note: expanded from macro 'BSWAP8'
^
e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c:223:12: note: previous declaration is here
size_t ret = 0;
^
Have clang be quiet by modifying the macro variable names slightly
(suffixing them with an underscore).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
While ARMv7 in general is capable of unaligned access, not all instructions
actually are. And trouble is that compiler doesn't seem to differentiate
those capable and incapable of unaligned access. Side effect is that kernel
goes into endless loop retrying same instruction triggering unaligned trap.
Problem was observed in xts128.c and ccm128.c modules. It's possible to
resolve it by using (volatile u32*) casts, but letting STRICT_ALIGNMENT
be feels more appropriate.
