More importantly, port CRL test from boringSSL crypto/x509/x509_test.cc
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1775)
$1<<32>>32 worked fine with either 32- or 64-bit perl for a good while,
relying on quirk that [pure] 32-bit perl performed it as $1<<0>>0. But
this apparently changed in some version past minimally required 5.10,
and operation result became 0. Yet, it went unnoticed for another while,
because most perl package providers configure their packages with
-Duse64bitint option.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
On all platforms, if the controlling tty isn't an actual tty, this is
flagged by setting is_a_tty to zero... except on VMS, where this was
treated as an error. Change this to behave like the other platforms.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2063)
There is code that retries calling RAND_bytes() until it gets something
other than 0, which just hangs if we always return 0.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2041
If on a non-tty stdin, TTY_get() will fail with errno == ENODEV.
We didn't catch that.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2039)
TTY_get() sometimes surprises us with new errno values to determine if
we have a controling terminal or not. This generated error is a
helpful tool to figure out that this was what happened and what the
unknown value is.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2043)
Since there are many parts of UI_process() that can go wrong, it isn't
very helpful to only return -1 with no further explanation. With this
change, the error message will at least show which part went wrong.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2037)
GH issue #1916 affects only big-endian platforms. TLS is not affected,
because TLS fragment is never big enough.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
The bug was introduced in 80d27cdb84,
one too many instructions was removed. It went unnoticed, because
new subroutine introduced in previous commit is called in real-life
RSA/DSA/DH cases, while original code is called only in rare tests.
The bug was caught in test_fuzz.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
It's called with 0 when it's already locked, with 1 when it's not.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1500
In non-__KERNEL__ context 32-bit-style __ARMEB__/__ARMEL__ macros were
set in arm_arch.h, which is shared between 32- and 64-bit builds. Since
it's not included in __KERNEL__ case, we have to adhere to official
64-bit pre-defines, __AARCH64EB__/__AARCH64EL__.
[If we are to share more code, it would need similar adjustment.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Both strdup or malloc failure should raise à err.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1905)
This reflects its position in include/openssl/ct.h.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Otherwise, |dec| gets moved past the end of the signature by
o2i_SCT_signature and then can't be correctly freed afterwards.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Factorise multiple bn_get_top(group->field) calls
Add missing checks on some conditional BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on some BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on a few bn_wexpand return value
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1626)
Do not call the time "current", as a different time can be provided.
For example, a time slightly in the future, to provide tolerance for
CT logs with a clock that is running fast.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)
Under certain circumstances, the libcrypto init code would loop,
causing a deadlock. This would typically happen if something in
ossl_init_base() caused an OpenSSL error, and the error stack routines
would recurse into the init code before the flag that ossl_init_base()
had been run was checked.
This change makes sure ossl_init_base isn't run once more of the base
is initiated.
Thanks to Dmitry Kostjuchenko for the idea.
Fixes Github issue #1899
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1922)
prio openssl 1.1.0 seed_len < q was accepted and the seed argument was
then ignored. Now DSA_generate_parameters_ex() returns an error in such
a case but no error string.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1657)
This reverts commit 349d1cfddc.
The proposed fix is incorrect. It marks the "run_once" code as having
finished before it has. The intended semantics of run_once is that no
threads should proceed until the code has run exactly once. With this
change the "second" thread will think the run_once code has already been
run and will continue, even though it is still in progress. This could
result in a crash or other incorrect behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Fixed deadlock in CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() if call to init() is causing
a recursive call to CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() again that is causing a hot
deadloop inside do { } while (result == ONCE_ININIT); section.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1913)
llvm's ubsan reported:
runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in
type 'int64_t' (aka 'long'); cast to an unsigned type to negate this
value to itself
Found using libfuzzer
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1908
