Commit graph

23 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nils Larsch
3de6d65ea3 improved error checking and some fixes
PR: 1170
Submitted by: Yair Elharrar
Reviewed and edited by: Nils Larsch
2005-07-26 20:55:17 +00:00
Andy Polyakov
25a66ee3cb Move cryptlib.h prior bio.h. Actually it makes sense to include cryptlib.h
first everywhere in crypto and skip stdio.h and string.h [because it
includes them].
2005-05-17 00:01:48 +00:00
Ben Laurie
41a15c4f0f Give everything prototypes (well, everything that's actually used). 2005-03-31 09:26:39 +00:00
Richard Levitte
d420ac2c7d Use BUF_strlcpy() instead of strcpy().
Use BUF_strlcat() instead of strcat().
Use BIO_snprintf() instead of sprintf().
In some cases, keep better track of buffer lengths.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
2003-12-27 14:40:17 +00:00
Richard Levitte
0535d3b25f Correct a misleading comment.
PR: 456
2003-01-13 14:53:43 +00:00
Richard Levitte
85940ea8ea Only check for a result buffer if the allocated string is a prompt string.
PR: 381
2002-12-05 00:04:30 +00:00
Ben Laurie
54a656ef08 Security fixes brought forward from 0.9.7. 2002-11-13 15:43:43 +00:00
Geoff Thorpe
79aa04ef27 Make the necessary changes to work with the recent "ex_data" overhaul.
See the commit log message for that for more information.

NB: X509_STORE_CTX's use of "ex_data" support was actually misimplemented
(initialisation by "memset" won't/can't/doesn't work). This fixes that but
requires that X509_STORE_CTX_init() be able to handle errors - so its
prototype has been changed to return 'int' rather than 'void'. All uses of
that function throughout the source code have been tracked down and
adjusted.
2001-09-01 20:02:13 +00:00
Geoff Thorpe
b7727ee616 The indexes returned by ***_get_ex_new_index() functions are used when
setting stack (actually, array) values in ex_data. So only increment the
global counters if the underlying CRYPTO_get_ex_new_index() call succeeds.
This change doesn't make "ex_data" right (see the comment at the head of
ex_data.c to know why), but at least makes the source code marginally less
frustrating.
2001-08-12 16:52:00 +00:00
Richard Levitte
103a434386 One forgotten function. 2001-07-11 07:10:43 +00:00
Richard Levitte
219a3580b7 Change info to correct values. 2001-07-05 10:19:13 +00:00
Richard Levitte
54c7559a7e Make sure we don't return 0 on error. 2001-06-24 07:00:41 +00:00
Richard Levitte
2d2ed9dffd Implement boolean (yes/no or OK/Cancel, ...) input.
Implement UI controls.  Current controls are the possibility to output
the OpenSSL error stack on the same channel from within UI_process()
and to check if the same user interface can be redone without being
rebuilt (this is often more a question of philosophy than
technicalities).
2001-06-23 16:22:48 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
54f7ebe789 In UI_dup_*() function, use the duped string, not the original. 2001-06-23 11:51:16 +00:00
Richard Levitte
eb929eef14 Since there is a way to create UI_METHODs, implement a destructor as
well.

This probably requires reference counters and locks as well.  To be
implemented later.
2001-06-20 15:00:08 +00:00
Richard Levitte
9ad0f6812f Enhance the user interface with better support for dialog box
prompting, application-defined prompts, the possibility to use
defaults (for example default passwords from somewhere else) and
interrupts/cancelations.
2001-06-19 15:52:00 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
76569fc662 Initialize UI ex_data. 2001-06-11 00:45:33 +00:00
Richard Levitte
f420de027f Don't forget to initialise. 2001-06-06 23:12:41 +00:00
Richard Levitte
30a54b9085 Defining __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED was the wrong thing. Instead, define
_XOPEN_SOURCE.
2001-06-05 20:29:26 +00:00
Richard Levitte
1e7e62f8cd A good use of the UI interface is as a password callback replacement
(for new functions...).  One might still want to be able to pass down
a user-data pointer to be used by the UI.  However, ex_data doesn't
quite cut it, since that means the appropriate index to it might need
to be shared between parts that aren't really related in that sense,
and would require the currently hidden (static) index holders to be
uncovered.  Not a good thing.  Therefore, add the possibility to add a
user-data pointer to a UI.
2001-06-05 19:05:52 +00:00
Richard Levitte
365359dd79 Make sure strdup() is properly declared. 2001-05-14 12:23:28 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
d6f188be71 Fix warning with DEBUG_SAFESTACK 2001-05-10 00:09:43 +00:00
Richard Levitte
a63d5eaab2 Add a general user interface API. This is designed to replace things
like des_read_password and friends (backward compatibility functions
using this new API are provided).  The purpose is to remove prompting
functions from the DES code section as well as provide for prompting
through dialog boxes in a window system and the like.
2001-05-06 23:19:37 +00:00