Apart from ssltest_old.c, the test suite relied on e_os.h for the
OSSL_NELEM macro and nothing else.
The ssltest_old.c also requires EXIT and some socket macros.
Create a new header to define the OSSL_NELEM macro and use that instead.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4186)
that needed test_main now works using the same infrastructure as tests that used
register_tests.
This meant:
* renaming register_tests to setup_tests and giving it a success/failure return.
* renaming the init_test function to setup_test_framework.
* renaming the finish_test function to pulldown_test_framework.
* adding a user provided global_init function that runs before the test frame
work is initialised. It returns a failure indication that stops the stest.
* adding helper functions that permit tests to access their command line args.
* spliting the BIO initialisation and finalisation out from the test setup and
teardown.
* hiding some of the now test internal functions.
* fix the comments in testutil.h
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3953)
Simple tests only need to implement register_tests().
Tests that need a custom main() should implement test_main(). This will
be wrapped in a main() that performs common setup/teardown (currently
crypto-mdebug).
Note that for normal development, enable-asan is usually
sufficient for detecting leaks, and more versatile.
enable-crypto-mdebug is stricter as it will also
insist that all static variables be freed. This is useful for debugging
library init/deinit; however, it also means that test_main() must free
everything it allocates.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
1) Remove some unnecessary fixtures
2) Add EXECUTE_TEST_NO_TEARDOWN shorthand when a fixture exists but has
no teardown.
3) Fix return values in ct_test.c (introduced by an earlier refactoring,
oops)
Note that for parameterized tests, the index (test vector) usually holds all the
customization, and there should be no need for a separate test
fixture. The CTS test is an exception: it demonstrates how to combine
customization with parameterization.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
