VMS. The C RTL can handle it well if the "directory" is a logical
name with no colon, therefore ending being 'logname/file'. However,
if the given logical names actually has a colon, or if you use a full
VMS-syntax directory, you end up with 'logname:/file' or
'dev:[dir1.dir2]/file', and that isn't handled in any good way.
So, on VMS, we need to check if the directory string ends with a
separator (one of ':', ']' or '>' (< and > can be used instead [ and
])), and handle that by not inserting anything between the directory
spec and the file name. In all other cases, it's assumed the
directory spec is a logical name, so we need to place a colon between
it and the file.
Notified by Kevin Greaney <kevin.greaney@hp.com>.
Use BUF_strlcat() instead of strcat().
Use BIO_snprintf() instead of sprintf().
In some cases, keep better track of buffer lengths.
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
The old code was painfully primitive and couldn't handle
distinct certificates using the same subject name.
The new code performs several tests on a candidate issuer
certificate based on certificate extensions.
It also adds several callbacks to X509_VERIFY_CTX so its
behaviour can be customised.
Unfortunately some hackery was needed to persuade X509_STORE
to tolerate this. This should go away when X509_STORE is
replaced, sometime...
This must have broken something though :-(
like Malloc, Realloc and especially Free conflict with already existing names
on some operating systems or other packages. That is reason enough to change
the names of the OpenSSL memory allocation macros to something that has a
better chance of being unique, like prepending them with OPENSSL_.
This change includes all the name changes needed throughout all C files.
This will soon be complemented with MacOS specific source code files and
INSTALL.MacOS.
I (Andy) have decided to get rid of a number of #include <sys/types.h>.
I've verified it's ok (both by examining /usr/include/*.h and compiling)
on a number of Unix platforms. Unfortunately I don't have Windows box
to verify this on. I really appreciate if somebody could try to compile
it and contact me a.s.a.p. in case a problem occurs.
Submitted by: Roy Wood <roy@centricsystems.ca>
Reviewed by: Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
