The assembler already knows the actual path to the generated file and,
in other perlasm architectures, is left to manage debug symbols itself.
Notably, in OpenSSL 1.1.x's new build system, which allows a separate
build directory, converting .pl to .s as the scripts currently do result
in the wrong paths.
This also avoids inconsistencies from some of the files using $0 and
some passing in the filename.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3431)
Issue 1:
sh.bittable_size is a size_t but i is and int, which can result in
freelist == -1 if sh.bittable_size exceeds an int.
This seems to result in an OPENSSL_assert due to invalid allocation
size, so maybe that is "ok."
Worse, if sh.bittable_size is exactly 1<<31, then this becomes an
infinite loop (because 1<<31 is a negative int, so it can be shifted
right forever and sticks at -1).
Issue 2:
CRYPTO_secure_malloc_init() sets secure_mem_initialized=1 even when
sh_init() returns 0.
If sh_init() fails, we end up with secure_mem_initialized=1 but
sh.minsize=0. If you then call secure_malloc(), which then calls,
sh_malloc(), this then enters an infite loop since 0 << anything will
never be larger than size.
Issue 3:
That same sh_malloc loop will loop forever for a size greater
than size_t/2 because i will proceed (assuming sh.minsize=16):
i=16, 32, 64, ..., size_t/8, size_t/4, size_t/2, 0, 0, 0, 0, ....
This sequence will never be larger than "size".
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3449)
BIO_socket_ioctl is only implemented on VMS for VMS version 7.0 and
up, but since we only support version 7.1 and up, there's no need to
check the VMS version.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3448)
Not exactly everywhere, but in those source files where stdint.h is
included conditionally, or where it will be eventually
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3447)
In some cases, testutil outputs subtests like this:
1..6 # Subtest: progname
The standard set by Test::More (because there really is no actual
standard yet) gives this display:
# Subtest: progname
1..6
Until the standard is actually agreed upon, let's do it like
Test::More.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3446)
- Mostly missing fall thru comments
- And uninitialized value used in sslapitest.c
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3440)
Add file/line# to test error message.
Also remove expected/got fields since TEST structure prints them.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3324)
Also, allow multiple files on commandline (for future splitup of
evptests.txt)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3324)
Allow conversion of existing requests to certificates again.
Fixes the issue #3396
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3437)
The second BN_is_zero test can never be true.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3434)
Add "single part" digest sign and verify functions. These sign and verify
a message in one function. This simplifies some operations and it will later
be used as the API for algorithms which do not support the update/final
mechanism (e.g. PureEdDSA).
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3409)
The function SSL_set_SSL_CTX() can be used to swap the SSL_CTX used for
a connection as part of an SNI callback. One result of this is that the
s->cert structure is replaced. However this structure contains information
about any custom extensions that have been loaded. In particular flags are
set indicating whether a particular extension has been received in the
ClientHello. By replacing the s->cert structure we lose the custom
extension flag values, and it appears as if a client has not sent those
extensions.
SSL_set_SSL_CTX() should copy any flags for custom extensions that appear
in both the old and the new cert structure.
Fixes#2180
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3425)
TAP:Harness came along in perl 5.10.1, and since we claim to support
perl 5.10.0 in configuration and testing, we can only load it
conditionally.
The main reason to use TAP::Harness rather than Test::Harness is its
capability to merge stdout and stderr output from the test recipes,
which Test::Harness can't. The merge gives much more comprehensible
output when testing verbosely.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3424)
This includes support for:
- comparisions between pairs of BIGNUMs
- comparisions between BIGNUMs and zero
- equality comparison between BIGNUMs and one
- equality comparisons between BIGNUMs and constants
- parity checks for BIGNUMs
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3405)
Verify that we fail if we receive an HRR but no change will result in
ClientHello2.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3414)
It is invalid if we receive an HRR but no change will result in
ClientHello2.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3414)
If an HRR gets sent without a key_share (e.g. cookie only) then the code
fails when it should not.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3414)
