Commit graph

75 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Caswell
6b473acabd Refactor ClientHello extension parsing
This builds on the work started in 1ab3836b3 and extends is so that
each extension has its own identified parsing functions, as well as an
allowed context identifying which messages and protocols it is relevant for.
Subsequent commits will do a similar job for the ServerHello extensions.
This will enable us to have common functions for processing extension blocks
no matter which of the multiple messages they are received from. In TLSv1.3
a number of different messages have extension blocks, and some extensions
have moved from one message to another when compared to TLSv1.2.

Perl changes reviewed by Richard Levitte. Non-perl changes reviewed by Rich
Salz

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-12-08 17:17:45 +00:00
Matt Caswell
ede6f76203 Move tls_collect_extensions() into a separate file
Subsequent commits will pull other extensions code into this file.

Perl changes reviewed by Richard Levitte. Non-perl changes reviewed by Rich
Salz

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-12-08 17:17:26 +00:00
Matt Caswell
7acb8b64c3 Use ClientHello.legacy_version for the RSA pre-master no matter what
Don't use what is in supported_versions for the RSA pre-master

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
2016-11-23 17:01:33 +00:00
Matt Caswell
7776a36cfa Ensure the end of first server flight processing is done
There is a set of miscellaneous processing for OCSP, CT etc at the end of
the ServerDone processing. In TLS1.3 we don't have a ServerDone, so this
needs to move elsewhere.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-23 15:31:21 +00:00
Matt Caswell
92760c21e6 Update state machine to be closer to TLS1.3
This is a major overhaul of the TLSv1.3 state machine. Currently it still
looks like TLSv1.2. This commit changes things around so that it starts
to look a bit less like TLSv1.2 and bit more like TLSv1.3.

After this commit we have:

ClientHello
+ key_share          ---->
                           ServerHello
                           +key_share
                           {CertificateRequest*}
                           {Certificate*}
                           {CertificateStatus*}
                     <---- {Finished}
{Certificate*}
{CertificateVerify*}
{Finished}           ---->
[ApplicationData]    <---> [Application Data]

Key differences between this intermediate position and the final TLSv1.3
position are:
- No EncryptedExtensions message yet
- No server side CertificateVerify message yet
- CertificateStatus still exists as a separate message
- A number of the messages are still in the TLSv1.2 format
- Still running on the TLSv1.2 record layer

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-23 15:31:21 +00:00
Matt Caswell
f2342b7ac3 Address some supported_versions review comments
Added some TODOs, refactored a couple of things and added a SSL_IS_TLS13()
macro.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:09 +00:00
Matt Caswell
b97667ce67 Fix some missing checks for TLS1_3_VERSION_DRAFT
There were a few places where we weren't checking to see if we were using
the draft TLS1.3 version or not.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:09 +00:00
Matt Caswell
d2f42576c4 Add a TODO(TLS1.3) about renegotation
Renegotiation does not exist in TLS1.3, so we need to disable it at some
point.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:09 +00:00
Matt Caswell
bf0ba5e704 A style tweak based on feedback received
Replace a bare ";" with "continue;" for the body of a for loop.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:08 +00:00
Matt Caswell
7b21c00e1c Look at the supported_versions extension even if the server <TLS1.3
If supported_versions is present it takes precedence.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:08 +00:00
Matt Caswell
bf85ef1b60 Ensure that vent->smeth != NULL before we call vent->smeth()
We can end up with a NULL SSL_METHOD function if a method has been
disabled. If that happens then we shouldn't call vent->smeth().

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:08 +00:00
Matt Caswell
16bce0e08b Address some review feedback comments for supported_versions
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:08 +00:00
Matt Caswell
cd99883755 Add server side support for supported_versions extension
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 16:03:08 +00:00
Matt Caswell
df7ce507fc Rename clienthello.version to clienthello.legacy_version
For consistency with the TLSv1.3 spec.

Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:30 +00:00
Matt Caswell
6438632420 Add some function documentation and update some existing comments
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:30 +00:00
Matt Caswell
801cb720ad Fix make update following extensions refactor
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:30 +00:00
Matt Caswell
de7d61d5c2 Improve some comment documentation following the extensions refactor
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:30 +00:00
Matt Caswell
b1b4b543ee Fix various style issues in the extension parsing refactor
Based on review feedback received.

Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:30 +00:00
Matt Caswell
1ab3836b3b Refactor ClientHello processing so that extensions get parsed earlier
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-09 09:10:29 +00:00
Matt Caswell
c437757466 Always ensure that init_msg is initialised for a CCS
We read it later in grow_init_buf(). If CCS is the first thing received in
a flight, then it will use the init_msg from the last flight we received. If
the init_buf has been grown in the meantime then it will point to some
arbitrary other memory location. This is likely to result in grow_init_buf()
attempting to grow to some excessively large amount which is likely to
fail. In practice this should never happen because the only time we receive
a CCS as the first thing in a flight is in an abbreviated handshake. None
of the preceding messages from the server flight would be large enough to
trigger this.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-07 15:22:33 +00:00
Matt Caswell
54105ddd23 Rename all "read" variables with "readbytes"
Travis is reporting one file at a time shadowed variable warnings where
"read" has been used. This attempts to go through all of libssl and replace
"read" with "readbytes" to fix all the problems in one go.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:46 +00:00
Matt Caswell
348240c676 Fix misc size_t issues causing Windows warnings in 64 bit
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:46 +00:00
Matt Caswell
8b0e934afb Fix some missed size_t updates
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:45 +00:00
Matt Caswell
12472b4561 Update numerous misc libssl fields to be size_t
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:45 +00:00
Matt Caswell
7ee8627f6e Convert libssl writing for size_t
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:45 +00:00
Matt Caswell
eda757514e Further libssl size_t-ify of reading
Writing still to be done

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-04 12:09:45 +00:00
Matt Caswell
582a17d662 Add the SSL_METHOD for TLSv1.3 and all other base changes required
Includes addition of the various options to s_server/s_client. Also adds
one of the new TLS1.3 ciphersuites.

This isn't "real" TLS1.3!! It's identical to TLS1.2 apart from the protocol
and the ciphersuite...and the ciphersuite is just a renamed TLS1.2 one (not
a "real" TLS1.3 ciphersuite).

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-11-02 13:08:21 +00:00
Matt Caswell
229185e668 Remove the special case processing for finished construction
tls_construct_finished() used to have different arguments to all of the
other construction functions. It doesn't anymore, so there is no neeed to
treat it as a special case.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-10-03 16:25:48 +01:00
Matt Caswell
4a01c59f36 Harmonise setting the header and closing construction
Ensure all message types work the same way including CCS so that the state
machine doesn't need to know about special cases. Put all the special logic
into ssl_set_handshake_header() and ssl_close_construct_packet().

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-10-03 16:25:48 +01:00
Matt Caswell
5923ad4bbe Don't set the handshake header in every message
Move setting the handshake header up a level into the state machine code
in order to reduce boilerplate.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-10-03 16:25:48 +01:00
Matt Caswell
7cea05dcc7 Move init of the WPACKET into write_state_machine()
Instead of initialising, finishing and cleaning up the WPACKET in every
message construction function, we should do it once in
write_state_machine().

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-10-03 16:25:48 +01:00
Matt Caswell
a29fa98ceb Rename ssl_set_handshake_header2()
ssl_set_handshake_header2() was only ever a temporary name while we had
to have ssl_set_handshake_header() for code that hadn't been converted to
WPACKET yet. No code remains that needed that so we can rename it.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-10-02 20:25:57 +01:00
Matt Caswell
c1ef7c971d Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header()
A TLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message.
This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length
are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending
reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed
to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that
memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive
message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could
mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a
connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory
exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place,
and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the
application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner
then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again.
Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature.
This then means that there is only a security impact if:

1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the
event that the connection fails
or
2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there
is very little free memory
or
3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there
are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for
the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is
insufficient memory to service the multiple requests.

Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to
be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is
subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an
increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack
of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service.

This issue does not affect DTLS users.

Issue was reported by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.).

CVE-2016-6307

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-09-21 20:37:53 +01:00
Matt Caswell
3c10632529 make update and fix some associated mis-matched error codes
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-09-21 14:31:30 +01:00
Matt Caswell
08029dfa03 Convert WPACKET_put_bytes to use convenience macros
All the other functions that take an argument for the number of bytes
use convenience macros for this purpose. We should do the same with
WPACKET_put_bytes().

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-20 14:47:44 +01:00
Matt Caswell
85a7a5e6ef Convert CCS construction to WPACKET
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-20 14:17:50 +01:00
Matt Caswell
4f89bfbf15 Convert Finished construction to WPACKET
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-20 12:26:38 +01:00
Matt Caswell
c49e191230 Convert Certificate message construction to WPACKET
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-20 10:16:56 +01:00
Matt Caswell
f1ec23c0bc Convert CKE construction to use the WPACKET API
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-14 00:02:34 +01:00
Matt Caswell
0217dd19c0 Move from explicit sub-packets to implicit ones
No need to declare an explicit sub-packet. Just start one.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-13 09:41:21 +01:00
Matt Caswell
ae2f7b37da Rename PACKETW to WPACKET
To avoid confusion with the read PACKET structure.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-13 09:41:21 +01:00
Matt Caswell
2c7b4dbc1a Convert tls_construct_client_hello() to use PACKETW
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-09-13 09:41:21 +01:00
Matt Caswell
f5c7f5dfba Fix DTLS buffered message DoS attack
DTLS can handle out of order record delivery. Additionally since
handshake messages can be bigger than will fit into a single packet, the
messages can be fragmented across multiple records (as with normal TLS).
That means that the messages can arrive mixed up, and we have to
reassemble them. We keep a queue of buffered messages that are "from the
future", i.e. messages we're not ready to deal with yet but have arrived
early. The messages held there may not be full yet - they could be one
or more fragments that are still in the process of being reassembled.

The code assumes that we will eventually complete the reassembly and
when that occurs the complete message is removed from the queue at the
point that we need to use it.

However, DTLS is also tolerant of packet loss. To get around that DTLS
messages can be retransmitted. If we receive a full (non-fragmented)
message from the peer after previously having received a fragment of
that message, then we ignore the message in the queue and just use the
non-fragmented version. At that point the queued message will never get
removed.

Additionally the peer could send "future" messages that we never get to
in order to complete the handshake. Each message has a sequence number
(starting from 0). We will accept a message fragment for the current
message sequence number, or for any sequence up to 10 into the future.
However if the Finished message has a sequence number of 2, anything
greater than that in the queue is just left there.

So, in those two ways we can end up with "orphaned" data in the queue
that will never get removed - except when the connection is closed. At
that point all the queues are flushed.

An attacker could seek to exploit this by filling up the queues with
lots of large messages that are never going to be used in order to
attempt a DoS by memory exhaustion.

I will assume that we are only concerned with servers here. It does not
seem reasonable to be concerned about a memory exhaustion attack on a
client. They are unlikely to process enough connections for this to be
an issue.

A "long" handshake with many messages might be 5 messages long (in the
incoming direction), e.g. ClientHello, Certificate, ClientKeyExchange,
CertificateVerify, Finished. So this would be message sequence numbers 0
to 4. Additionally we can buffer up to 10 messages in the future.
Therefore the maximum number of messages that an attacker could send
that could get orphaned would typically be 15.

The maximum size that a DTLS message is allowed to be is defined by
max_cert_list, which by default is 100k. Therefore the maximum amount of
"orphaned" memory per connection is 1500k.

Message sequence numbers get reset after the Finished message, so
renegotiation will not extend the maximum number of messages that can be
orphaned per connection.

As noted above, the queues do get cleared when the connection is closed.
Therefore in order to mount an effective attack, an attacker would have
to open many simultaneous connections.

Issue reported by Quan Luo.

CVE-2016-2179

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-08-22 10:53:55 +01:00
Emilia Kasper
a230b26e09 Indent ssl/
Run util/openssl-format-source on ssl/

Some comments and hand-formatted tables were fixed up
manually by disabling auto-formatting.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-08-18 14:02:29 +02:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
2e5ead831b Constify ssl_cert_type()
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-08-17 15:49:44 +01:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
8900f3e398 Convert X509* functions to use const getters
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-08-17 13:59:04 +01:00
David Woodhouse
032924c4b4 Make DTLS1_BAD_VER work with DTLS_client_method()
DTLSv1_client_method() is deprecated, but it was the only way to obtain
DTLS1_BAD_VER support. The SSL_OP_CISCO_ANYCONNECT hack doesn't work with
DTLS_client_method(), and it's relatively non-trivial to make it work without
expanding the hack into lots of places.

So deprecate SSL_OP_CISCO_ANYCONNECT with DTLSv1_client_method(), and make
it work with SSL_CTX_set_{min,max}_proto_version(DTLS1_BAD_VER) instead.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
2016-08-04 20:56:24 +01:00
FdaSilvaYY
e8aa8b6c8f Fix a few if(, for(, while( inside code.
Fix some indentation at the same time

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1292)
2016-07-20 07:21:53 -04:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
d166ed8c11 check return values for EVP_Digest*() APIs
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-07-15 14:09:05 +01:00
FdaSilvaYY
0485d5406a Whitespace cleanup in ssl folder
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
2016-06-29 09:56:39 -04:00