Commit graph

56 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Emilia Kasper
74726750ef Port DTLS version negotiation tests
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-06-13 16:13:13 +02:00
Emilia Kasper
81fc33c951 Clean up following new SNI tests
- Only send SNI in SNI tests. This allows us to test handshakes without
  the SNI extension as well.
- Move all handshake-specific machinery to handshake_helper.c
- Use enum types to represent the enum everywhere
  (Resorting to plain ints can end in sign mismatch when the enum is
  represented by an unsigned type.)

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-06-13 16:03:06 +02:00
Todd Short
5c753de668 Fix session ticket and SNI
When session tickets are used, it's possible that SNI might swtich the
SSL_CTX on an SSL. Normally, this is not a problem, because the
initial_ctx/session_ctx are used for all session ticket/id processes.

However, when the SNI callback occurs, it's possible that the callback
may update the options in the SSL from the SSL_CTX, and this could
cause SSL_OP_NO_TICKET to be set. If this occurs, then two bad things
can happen:

1. The session ticket TLSEXT may not be written when the ticket expected
flag is set. The state machine transistions to writing the ticket, and
the client responds with an error as its not expecting a ticket.
2. When creating the session ticket, if the ticket key cb returns 0
the crypto/hmac contexts are not initialized, and the code crashes when
trying to encrypt the session ticket.

To fix 1, if the ticket TLSEXT is not written out, clear the expected
ticket flag.
To fix 2, consider a return of 0 from the ticket key cb a recoverable
error, and write a 0 length ticket and continue. The client-side code
can explicitly handle this case.

Fix these two cases, and add unit test code to validate ticket behavior.

Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1098)
2016-06-09 13:07:51 -04:00
Rich Salz
440e5d805f Copyright consolidation 02/10
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-05-17 14:20:27 -04:00
Emilia Kasper
a263f320eb Remove proxy tests. Add verify callback tests.
The old proxy tests test the implementation of an application proxy
policy callback defined in the test itself, which is not particularly
useful.

It is, however, useful to test cert verify overrides in
general. Therefore, replace these tests with tests for cert verify
callback behaviour.

Also glob the ssl test inputs on the .in files to catch missing
generated files.

Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
2016-05-12 19:02:42 +02:00
Emilia Kasper
453dfd8d5e New SSL test framework
Currently, SSL tests are configured via command-line switches to
ssltest.c. This results in a lot of duplication between ssltest.c and
apps, and a complex setup. ssltest.c is also simply old and needs
maintenance.

Instead, we already have a way to configure SSL servers and clients, so
we leverage that. SSL tests can now be configured from a configuration
file. Test servers and clients are configured using the standard
ssl_conf module. Additional test settings are configured via a test
configuration.

Moreover, since the CONF language involves unnecessary boilerplate, the
test conf itself is generated from a shorter Perl syntax.

The generated testcase files are checked in to the repo to make
it easier to verify that the intended test cases are in fact run; and to
simplify debugging failures.

To demonstrate the approach, min/max protocol tests are converted to the
new format. This change also fixes MinProtocol and MaxProtocol
handling. It was previously requested that an SSL_CTX have both the
server and client flags set for these commands; this clearly can never work.

Guide to this PR:
 - test/ssl_test.c - test framework
 - test/ssl_test_ctx.* - test configuration structure
 - test/handshake_helper.* - new SSL test handshaking code
 - test/ssl-tests/ - test configurations
 - test/generate_ssl_tests.pl - script for generating CONF-style test
   configurations from perl inputs

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
2016-04-05 13:44:46 +02:00