the 'ca' utility. This can now be extensively
customised in the configuration file and handles
multibyte strings and extensions properly.
This is required when extensions copying from
certificate requests is supported: the user
must be able to view the extensions before
allowing a certificate to be issued.
sets the subject name for a new request or supersedes the
subject name in a given request.
Add options '-batch' and '-verbose' to 'openssl req'.
Submitted by: Massimiliano Pala <madwolf@hackmasters.net>
Reviewed by: Bodo Moeller
and make all files the depend on it include it without prefixing it
with openssl/.
This means that all Makefiles will have $(TOP) as one of the include
directories.
of session IDs. Namely, passing "-id_prefix <text>" will set a
generate_session_id() callback that generates session IDs as random data
with <text> block-copied over the top of the start of the ID. This can be
viewed by watching the session ID s_client's output when it connects.
This is mostly useful for testing any SSL/TLS code (eg. proxies) that wish
to deal with multiple servers, when each of which might be generating a
unique range of session IDs (eg. with a certain prefix).
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting
with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making
sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with
opensslconf.h.
I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from
external software that will adapt if they have used something like
NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this
change would be a good thing.
Remove the old broken bio read of serial numbers in the 'ca' index
file. This would choke if a revoked certificate was specified with
a negative serial number.
Fix typo in uid.c
Make ca.c correctly initialize the revocation date.
Make ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string() and ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_set_string() set the
string type: so they can initialize ASN1_TIME structures properly.
client code certificates to use to only check response signatures.
I'm not entirely sure if the way I just implemented the verification
is the right way to do it, and would be happy if someone would like to
review this.
