PR #3399 converted shlibloadtest to the new test framework. It also
seemed to add some `OPENSSL_USE_NODELETE` guards to the library
unloading part of the test. This part was added in a commit with this
description:
Review feedback; use single main, #ifdef ADD_TEST
Suppose OPENSSL_USE_NODELETE (via Nick Reilly)
Strangely though there doesn't seem to be any relevant review feedback
in that PR that could justify the addition of those guards. The guards
do not appear in 1.1.0.
Having the guards changes the nature of the test, so that we only test
library unloading on platforms where OPENSSL_USE_NODELETE is set (Linux
and Windows). I can't think of any good reason for this and as it doesn't
seem to be necessary in 1.1.0 so I think we should remove them.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5530)
With "-multi" the OCSP responder forks multiple child processes,
and respawns them as needed. This can be used as a long-running
service, not just a demo program. Therefore the index file is
automatically re-read when changed. The responder also now optionally
times out client requests.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Retain open file handle and previous stat data for the CA index
file, enabling detection and index reload (upcoming commit).
Check requirements before entering accept loop.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
We have never used these variables with the Unix Makefile, and there's
no reason for us to change this, so to avoid confusion, we remove them.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5545)
When running iOS application from command line it's impossible to
get past the failing capability detection. This is because it's
executed under debugger and iOS debugger is impossible to deal with.
[If Apple implements SHA512 in silicon, it would have to be detected
with sysctlbyname.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-fno-common was removed for all Darwin targets in
0c8734198d with rationale "it's either
'ranlib -c' or '-fno-common'." However, it's still absolutely required
in 32-bit darwin-ppc-cc. And when trying things out I didn't quite
see why it was formulated as one-or-another choice, as 'ranlib -c'
shouldn't [and doesn't] have problems with object modules without
commons. [Well, to be frank, I didn't manage to reproduce the problem
the modification was meaning to resolve either...]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Had been observed with recent gcc-8 snapshot and
$ ./config --strict-warnings enable-asan
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5519)
We currently don't support the algorithm from NIST SP 800-90C
10.1.2 to use a weaker DRBG as source
Reviewed-by: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
GH: #5506
Either files or directories of *.cnf or *.conf files
can be included.
Recursive inclusion of directories is not supported.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5351)
They are valid for use in a CertificateRequest message, but we did not
allow it. If a server sent such a message using either of those two
extensions then the handshake would abort.
This corrects that error, but does not add support for actually processing
the extensions. They are simply ignored, and a TODO is inserted to add
support at a later time.
This was found during interoperability testing with btls:
https://gitlab.com/ilari_l/btls
Prompted by these errors I reviewed the complete list of extensions and
compared them with the latest table in draft-24 to confirm there were no
other errors of a similar type. I did not find any.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5490)
Debugging asserts had implicit casts that triggered the warnings.
However, instead of making the casts explicit it's more appropriate
to perform checks that ensure that implicit casts were safe.
ec/curve448/scalar.c: size_t-fy scalar_decode_short.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5494)
This adds the Ed448 test vectors from RFC8032 and the X448 test vectors
from RFC7748.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5481)
This adds all of the relevant EVP plumbing required to make
X448 and Ed448 work.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5481)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5458)
Why is it redundant? We're looking at carry from addition of small,
11-bit number to 256-bit one. And carry would mean only one thing,
resulting first limb being small number and remaing ones - zeros.
Hence adding 38 to first limb can't carry.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5476)
When early data support was first added, this seemed like a good
idea, as it would allow applications to just add SSL_read_early_data()
calls as needed and have things "Just Work". However, for applications
that do not use TLS 1.3 early data, there is a negative side effect.
Having a nonzero max_early_data in a SSL_CTX (and thus, SSL objects
derived from it) means that when generating a session ticket,
tls_construct_stoc_early_data() will indicate to the client that
the server supports early data. This is true, in that the implementation
of TLS 1.3 (i.e., OpenSSL) does support early data, but does not
necessarily indicate that the server application supports early data,
when the default value is nonzero. In this case a well-intentioned
client would send early data along with its resumption attempt, which
would then be ignored by the server application, a waste of network
bandwidth.
Since, in order to successfully use TLS 1.3 early data, the application
must introduce calls to SSL_read_early_data(), it is not much additional
burden to require that the application also calls
SSL_{CTX_,}set_max_early_data() in order to enable the feature; doing
so closes this scenario where early data packets would be sent on
the wire but ignored.
Update SSL_read_early_data.pod accordingly, and make s_server and
our test programs into applications that are compliant with the new
requirements on applications that use early data.
Fixes#4725
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5483)
