Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8181)
featuring 6x"horizontal" code path which is up to 25%
faster than present 4x"vertical" for larger blocks.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8287)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8257)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6919)
Some of the instructions used in latest additions are extension
ones. There is no real reason to limit ourselves to specific
processors, so [re-]adhere to base instruction set.
RT#4548
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Some of these scripts would recognise an output parameter if it looks
like a file path. That works both in both the classic and new build
schemes. Some fo these scripts would only recognise it if it's a
basename (i.e. no directory component). Those need to be corrected,
as the output parameter in the new build scheme is more likely to
contain a directory component than not.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
