We had updates of certain header files in both Makefile.org and the
Makefile in the directory the header file lived in. This is error
prone and also sometimes generates slightly different results (usually
just a comment that differs) depending on which way the update was
done.
This removes the file update targets from the top level Makefile, adds
an update: target in all Makefiles and has it depend on the depend: or
local_depend: targets, whichever is appropriate, so we don't get a
double run through the whole file tree.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
With no more symlinks, there's no need for those variables, or the links
target. This also goes for all install: and uninstall: targets that do
nothing but copy $(EXHEADER) files, since that's now taken care of by the
top Makefile.
Also, removed METHTEST from test/Makefile. It looks like an old test that's
forgotten...
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Rather than making include/openssl/foo.h a symlink to
crypto/foo/foo.h, this change moves the file to include/openssl/foo.h
once and for all.
Likewise, move crypto/foo/footest.c to test/footest.c, instead of
symlinking it there.
Originally-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Exported headers shouldn't be included as "foo.h" by code from the same
module, it should only do so for module-internal headers. This is
because the symlinking of exported headers (from include/openssl/foo.h
to crypto/foo/foo.h) is being removed, and the exported headers are
being moved to the include/openssl/ directory instead.
Change-Id: I4c1d80849544713308ddc6999a549848afc25f94
Signed-off-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
knock-on work than expected - they've been extracted into a patch
series that can be completed elsewhere, or in a different branch,
before merging back to HEAD.
/*
* This release balances code size and performance. In particular key
* schedule setup is fully unrolled, because doing so *significantly*
* reduces amount of instructions per setup round and code increase is
* justifiable. In block functions on the other hand only inner loops
* are unrolled, as full unroll gives only nominal performance boost,
* while code size grows 4 or 7 times. Also, unlike previous versions
* this one "encourages" compiler to keep intermediate variables in
* registers, which should give better "all round" results, in other
* words reasonable performance even with not so modern compilers.
*/