When an SSL's context is swtiched from a ticket-enabled context to
a ticket-disabled context in the servername callback, no session-id
is generated, so the session can't be resumed.
If a servername callback changes the SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option, check
to see if it's changed to disable, and whether a session ticket is
expected (i.e. the client indicated ticket support and the SSL had
tickets enabled at the time), and whether we already have a previous
session (i.e. s->hit is set).
In this case, clear the ticket-expected flag, remove any ticket data
and generate a session-id in the session.
If the SSL hit (resumed) and switched to a ticket-disabled context,
assume that the resumption was via session-id, and don't bother to
update the session.
Before this fix, the updated unit-tests in 06-sni-ticket.conf would
fail test #4 (server1 = SNI, server2 = no SNI).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1529)
"Early callback" is a little ambiguous now that early data exists.
Perhaps "ClientHello callback"?
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4349)
Add two tests with ECDSA+SHA256 preferred over Ed25519, the second also
excludes P-256 from the supported curves extension which will force the
use of Ed25519 in TLS 1.2, but not TLS 1.3: this would fail before the
certificate table updates.
Add TLS 1.3 test also with P-256 exclude from the groups extension: this
should have no effect as the groups extension is not used for signature
selection in TLS 1.3
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3858)
Add padding callback for application control
Standard block_size callback
Documentation and tests included
Configuration file/s_client/s_srver option
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3130)
The previous commits added sanity checks for where the max enabled protocol
version does not have any configured ciphersuites. We should check that we
fail in those circumstances.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3316)
Ensure that there are ciphersuites enabled for the maximum supported
version we will accept in a ClientHello.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3316)
Ensure that there are ciphersuites enabled for the maximum supported
version we are claiming in the ClientHello.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3316)
The only SSL tests prior to this tested using certificates with no
embedded Signed Certificate Timestamps (SCTs), which meant they couldn't
confirm whether Certificate Transparency checks in "strict" mode were
working.
These tests reveal a bug in the validation of SCT timestamps, which is
fixed by the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3138)
We already test DTLS protocol versions. For good measure, add some
DTLS tests with client auth to the new test framework, so that we can
remove the old tests without losing coverage.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Plumb things through in the same place as the SNI callback, since
we recommend that the early callback replace (and supplement) the
SNI callback, and add a few test cases.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2279)
In 1.1.0 changing the ciphersuite during a renegotiation can result in
a crash leading to a DoS attack. In master this does not occur with TLS
(instead you get an internal error, which is still wrong but not a security
issue) - but the problem still exists in the DTLS code.
This commit provides a test for the issue.
CVE-2017-3733
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
For TLS 1.3 we select certificates with signature algorithms extension
only. For ECDSA+SHA384 there is the additional restriction that the
curve must be P-384: since the test uses P-256 this should fail.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2339)
Add a client authentication signature algorithm to simple
ssl test and a server signature algorithm. Since we don't
do client auth this should have no effect. However if we
use client auth signature algorithms by mistake this will
abort the handshake with a no shared signature algorithms
error.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2290)
Add certifcate selection tests: the certificate type is selected by cipher
string and signature algorithm.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2224)
