The BIGNUM behaviour is supposed to be "consistent" when going into and
out of APIs, where "consistent" means 'top' is set minimally and that
'neg' (negative) is not set if the BIGNUM is zero (which is iff 'top' is
zero, due to the previous point).
The BN_DEBUG testing (make test) caught the cases that this patch
corrects.
Note, bn_correct_top() could have been used instead, but that is intended
for where 'top' is expected to (sometimes) require adjustment after direct
word-array manipulation, and so is heavier-weight. Here, we are just
catching the negative-zero case, so we test and correct for that
explicitly, in-place.
Change-Id: Iddefbd3c28a13d935648932beebcc765d5b85ae7
Signed-off-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1672)
This was done by the following
find . -name '*.[ch]' | /tmp/pl
where /tmp/pl is the following three-line script:
print unless $. == 1 && m@/\* .*\.[ch] \*/@;
close ARGV if eof; # Close file to reset $.
And then some hand-editing of other files.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
The functions BN_rshift and BN_lshift shift their arguments to the right or
left by a specified number of bits. Unpredicatable results (including
crashes) can occur if a negative number is supplied for the shift value.
Thanks to Mateusz Kocielski (LogicalTrust), Marek Kroemeke and Filip Palian
for discovering and reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
There are header files in crypto/ that are used by a number of crypto/
submodules. Move those to crypto/include/internal and adapt the
affected source code and Makefiles.
The header files that got moved are:
crypto/cryptolib.h
crypto/md32_common.h
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Just as with the OPENSSL_malloc calls, consistently use sizeof(*ptr)
for memset and memcpy. Remove needless casts for those functions.
For memset, replace alternative forms of zero with 0.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
generally a more efficient comparison than comparing two integers, and the
first of these two loops was off-by-one (copying one too many values). This
change also removes a superfluous assignment that would set an unused word
to zero (and potentially allow an overrun in some cases).
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
two functions that did expansion on in parameters (BN_mul() and
BN_sqr()). The problem was solved by making bn_dup_expand() which is
a mix of bn_expand2() and BN_dup().
