This is done by taking one vector, "corrupting" last bit of the
tag value and verifying that decrypt fails.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
MD5/SHA1 and MDC-2 have special-case logic beyond the generic DigestInfo
wrapping. Test that each of these works, including hash and length
mismatches (both input and signature). Also add VerifyRecover tests. It
appears 5824cc2981 added support for
VerifyRecover, but forgot to add the test data.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
RFC 3447, section 8.2.2, steps 3 and 4 states that verifiers must encode
the DigestInfo struct and then compare the result against the public key
operation result. This implies that one and only one encoding is legal.
OpenSSL instead parses with crypto/asn1, then checks that the encoding
round-trips, and allows some variations for the parameter. Sufficient
laxness in this area can allow signature forgeries, as described in
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/26/pkcs1.html
Although there aren't known attacks against OpenSSL's current scheme,
this change makes OpenSSL implement the algorithm as specified. This
avoids the uncertainty and, more importantly, helps grow a healthy
ecosystem. Laxness beyond the spec, particularly in implementations
which enjoy wide use, risks harm to the ecosystem for all. A signature
producer which only tests against OpenSSL may not notice bugs and
accidentally become widely deployed. Thus implementations have a
responsibility to honor the specification as tightly as is practical.
In some cases, the damage is permanent and the spec deviation and
security risk becomes a tax all implementors must forever pay, but not
here. Both BoringSSL and Go successfully implemented and deployed
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 as specified since their respective beginnings, so
this change should be compatible enough to pin down in future OpenSSL
releases.
See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00
As a bonus, by not having to deal with sign/verify differences, this
version is also somewhat clearer. It also more consistently enforces
digest lengths in the verify_recover codepath. The NID_md5_sha1 codepath
wasn't quite doing this right.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
Add copyright to missing assembler files.
Add copyrights to missing test/* files.
Add copyrights
Various source and misc files.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
This minimizes inter-block overhead. Performance gain naturally
varies from case to case, up to 10% was spotted so far. There is
one thing to recognize, given same circumstances gain would be
higher faster computational part is. Or in other words biggest
improvement coefficient would have been observed with assembly.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
This patch implements the HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation
Function (HKDF) as defined in RFC 5869.
It is required to implement the QUIC and TLS 1.3 protocols (among others).
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Rewrite EVP_DecodeUpdate.
In particular: reject extra trailing padding, and padding in the middle
of the content. Don't limit line length. Add tests.
Previously, the behaviour was ill-defined, and depended on the position
of the padding within the input.
In addition, this appears to fix a possible two-byte oob read.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Add DSA tests.
Add tests to verify signatures against public keys. This will also check
that a public key is read in correctly.
Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
Rather than making include/openssl/foo.h a symlink to
crypto/foo/foo.h, this change moves the file to include/openssl/foo.h
once and for all.
Likewise, move crypto/foo/footest.c to test/footest.c, instead of
symlinking it there.
Originally-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
