Commit graph

77 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark J. Cox
60bee5d44c Bump for 0.9.7l-dev 2006-09-05 08:38:12 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
975a7a483f Prepare 0.9.7k release 2006-09-05 08:34:07 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
a6fb8a8203 Update for next dev version. 2006-05-04 13:08:01 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
d26d236162 Prepare for release 2006-05-04 12:52:59 +00:00
Richard Levitte
2f4d5c6542 After release. 2005-10-14 22:43:18 +00:00
Richard Levitte
deab8d9392 Time for release of 0.9.7i.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7i
2005-10-14 22:15:53 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
49a305e7ef Bump after tagging for 0.9.7h release 2005-10-11 10:14:27 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
a40916cbba Add fixes for CAN-2005-2969
Bump release ready for OpenSSL_0_9_7h tag
2005-10-11 10:10:05 +00:00
Richard Levitte
d060fc9ff2 Now that things have been tagged properly, make preparations for the
next version in the 0.9.7 branch.
2005-04-11 15:15:09 +00:00
Richard Levitte
22e5a7935f Prepare to release 0.9.7g.
The tag till be OpenSSL_0_9_7g.
2005-04-11 15:10:07 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
da26bcb5de Update CHANGES, opensslv.h 2005-03-22 21:27:36 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
5c1fd5e316 Update files ready for release. 2005-03-22 18:17:23 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
2f547d2c1c Change version numbers to 0.9.7f-dev 2004-10-25 11:31:28 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
bfb7bac83b Updates for 0.9.7e release. 2004-10-25 11:24:39 +00:00
Andy Polyakov
1f4eccaaa5 Make reservations in FIPS code for upcoming size_t-fication of OpenSSL API.
And couple of bug-fixes in fips/rand code [return without lock release and
incorrect return value in fips_rand_bytes].
2004-05-17 15:37:26 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
494593845c After tagging 2004-03-17 12:03:38 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
82d63d3028 Fix null-pointer assignment in do_change_cipher_spec() revealed
by using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool (CAN-2004-0079)
Fix flaw in SSL/TLS handshaking when using Kerberos ciphersuites
(CAN-2004-0112)
Ready for 0.9.7d build

Submitted by: Steven Henson
Reviewed by: Joe Orton
Approved by: Mark Cox
2004-03-17 12:01:19 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
0c6fa13fee In order to get the expected self signed error when
calling X509_verify_cert() in x509.c the cert should
not be added to the trusted store.
2003-09-30 13:10:48 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
68f0bcfbc3 Changes for release 2003-09-30 12:08:23 +00:00
Richard Levitte
fba1cfa06d The release is tagged, time to work on 0.9.7c. 2003-04-10 20:40:19 +00:00
Richard Levitte
27f7d430ce Forgot to code the status bits for release. This file will be
retagged.
2003-04-10 20:29:08 +00:00
Richard Levitte
5964e95c0a Time to release 0.9.7b.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7b.
2003-04-10 20:22:15 +00:00
Richard Levitte
dab0aaa612 Let's move on to development of 0.9.7b. 2003-02-19 12:55:39 +00:00
Richard Levitte
6fcf1dbc50 Time to release 0.9.7a.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7a.
2003-02-19 12:33:55 +00:00
Richard Levitte
4a2e36b19e It's rather silly to believe we'd release 0.9.7a in 2002 :-). 2002-12-31 00:59:36 +00:00
Richard Levitte
1c2018f37f Tagging is done, move on to development of 0.9.7a. 2002-12-31 00:02:34 +00:00
Richard Levitte
04572965ea Time for release of OpenSSL 0.9.7.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7.
2002-12-30 23:54:11 +00:00
Richard Levitte
b65d3741b3 Move on to beta7 (hopefully, that will never appear) 2002-12-17 14:48:24 +00:00
Richard Levitte
fcf8f4d453 Time to release OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta6.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7-beta6.
2002-12-17 14:24:51 +00:00
Richard Levitte
af0b30e77c Tagging has been done, time to move the branch to 0.9.7-beta6
development.
2002-12-05 23:10:01 +00:00
Richard Levitte
9494e3cc40 Time to release 0.9.7-beta5.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7-beta5.
2002-12-05 22:51:19 +00:00
Richard Levitte
8f89ae928b We now work with the development of 0.9.7 beta 5. 2002-11-19 11:37:03 +00:00
Richard Levitte
8e458d52b5 Time to release 0.9.7-beta4.
The tag will be OpenSSL_0_9_7-beta4
2002-11-19 09:34:29 +00:00
Lutz Jänicke
458bb156bf Release 0.9.7-beta3
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
2002-07-30 11:27:18 +00:00
Lutz Jänicke
48acb9e08a Roll OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta2
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
2002-06-16 11:27:44 +00:00
Lutz Jänicke
3ae184d31f Ok, we are rolling 0.9.7-beta1 now.
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
2002-06-01 15:21:55 +00:00
Richard Levitte
9dfcad117c Change the date to XX xxx XXXX in development versions. 2002-04-11 21:53:57 +00:00
Richard Levitte
6bc847e49e Apply the Tru64 patch from Tim Mooney <mooney@dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu>
His comments are:

1) Changes all references for `True64' to be `Tru64', which is the correct
spelling for the OS name.

2) Makes `alpha-cc' be the same as `alpha164-cc', and adds an `alphaold-cc'
entry that is the same as the previous `alpha-cc'.  The reason is that most
people these days are using the newer compiler, so it should be the default.

3) Adds a bit of commentary to Configure, regarding the name changes of
the OS over the years, so it's not so confusing to people that haven't been
with the OS for a while.

4) Adds an `alpha-cc-rpath' target (which is *not* selected automatically
by Configure under any circumstance) that builds an RPATH into the
shared libraries.  This is explained in the comment in Configure.  It's
very very useful for people that want it, and people that don't want it
just shouldn't choose that target.

5) Adds the `-pthread' flag as the best way to get POSIX thread support
from the newer compiler.

6) Updates the Makefile targets, so that when the `alpha164-cc', `alpha-cc',
or `alpha-cc-rpath' target is what Configure is set to use, it uses a Makefile
target that includes the `-msym' option when building the shared library.
This is a performance enhancement.

7) Updates `config' so that if it detects you're running version 4 or 5
of the OS, it automatically selects `alpha-cc', but uses `alphaold-cc'
for versions 1-3 of the OS.

8) Updates the comment in opensslv.h, fixing both the OS name typo and
adding a reference to IRIX 6.x, since the shared library semantics are
virtually identical there.
2001-08-10 15:26:21 +00:00
Bodo Möller
97639f0d73 In version numbers, there is just one "M" nybble. 2001-07-10 10:04:26 +00:00
Richard Levitte
8df8f27513 Bump the shared library version (should have been done a while ago). 2000-10-13 15:09:06 +00:00
Richard Levitte
c5e8580e7b Update the status and version number to 0.9.7-dev. 2000-09-24 17:31:37 +00:00
Richard Levitte
0e8f2fdfdd Time to build the release. Bump the version info accordingly. 2000-09-24 15:21:30 +00:00
Richard Levitte
d40898dfab Time to build beta 3. Bump the version numbers accordingly. 2000-09-21 09:08:44 +00:00
Richard Levitte
a440d6636f A new beta is being released. Change the version numbers
accordingly.
2000-09-17 20:19:44 +00:00
Richard Levitte
bed1847b6a Time to release a beta. Change the version numbers and dates
accordingly.
2000-09-11 12:31:36 +00:00
Richard Levitte
b436a98257 Redo and enhance the support for building shared libraries. Currently
there's support for building under Linux and True64 (using examples
from the programming manuals), including versioning that is currently
the same as OpenSSL versions but should really be a different series.

With this change, it's up to the users to decide if they want shared
libraries as well as the static ones.  This decision now has to be
done at configuration time (well, not really, those who know what they
do can still do it the same way as before).

The OpenSSL programs (openssl and the test programs) are currently
always linked statically, but this may change in the future in a
configurable manner.  The necessary makefile variables to enable this
are in place.

Also note that I have done absolutely nothing about the Windows target
to get something similar.  On the other hand, DLLs are already the
default there, but without versioning, and I've no idea what the
possibilities for such a thing are there...
2000-07-21 15:08:53 +00:00
Richard Levitte
7c6c052e68 Tagging has now been done, update to the next possible version (I keep
a low profile, so we don't get discontinuity in the numbering...)
2000-04-01 11:21:14 +00:00
Richard Levitte
561c71a76b Building version 0.9.5a 2000-04-01 11:03:41 +00:00
Richard Levitte
90cc4e29b3 Tagging has been done, update to next probable version... 2000-03-23 21:14:11 +00:00
Richard Levitte
0806278561 Time for version 0.9.5a beta2
I know it's earlier than announced.  The high amount of problems in
beta1 warants this, however.
2000-03-23 21:07:41 +00:00