Cosmetic changes to use the X509_STORE_lock/unlock functions.
Renamed some ctx variables to store.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9366)
(cherry picked from commit 7a9abccde7)
x509 store's objects cache can get corrupted when using dir lookup
method in multithreaded application. Claim x509 store's lock when
accessing objects cache.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9326)
(cherry picked from commit a161738a70)
If using a custom X509_LOOKUP_METHOD then calls to
X509_STORE_CTX_get_by_subject may crash due to an incorrectly initialised
X509_OBJECT being passed to the callback get_by_subject function.
Fixes#8673
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8698)
(cherry picked from commit b926f9deb3)
The check_key_level() function currently fails when the public key
cannot be extracted from the certificate because its algorithm is not
supported. However, the public key is not needed for the last
certificate in the chain.
This change moves the check for level 0 before the check for a
non-NULL public key.
For background, this is the TPM 1.2 endorsement key certificate.
I.e., this is a real application with millions of certificates issued.
The key is an RSA-2048 key.
The TCG (for a while) specified
Public Key Algorithm: rsaesOaep
rather than the commonly used
Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption
because the key is an encryption key rather than a signing key.
The X509 certificate parser fails to get the public key.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7906)
Also, some readers of the code find starting the count at 1 for EE
cert confusing (since RFC5280 counts only non-self-issued intermediate
CAs, but we also counted the leaf). Therefore, never count the EE
cert, and adjust the path length comparison accordinly. This may
be more clear to the reader.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit dc5831da59)
At the bottom of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-12 and
top of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-13 (last paragraph
of above https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-3.3), we see:
This specification covers two classes of certificates: CA
certificates and end entity certificates. CA certificates may be
further divided into three classes: cross-certificates, self-issued
certificates, and self-signed certificates. Cross-certificates are
CA certificates in which the issuer and subject are different
entities. Cross-certificates describe a trust relationship between
the two CAs. Self-issued certificates are CA certificates in which
the issuer and subject are the same entity. Self-issued certificates
are generated to support changes in policy or operations. Self-
signed certificates are self-issued certificates where the digital
signature may be verified by the public key bound into the
certificate. Self-signed certificates are used to convey a public
key for use to begin certification paths. End entity certificates
are issued to subjects that are not authorized to issue certificates.
that the term "self-issued" is only applicable to CAs, not end-entity
certificates. In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.9
the description of path length constraints says:
The pathLenConstraint field is meaningful only if the cA boolean is
asserted and the key usage extension, if present, asserts the
keyCertSign bit (Section 4.2.1.3). In this case, it gives the
maximum number of non-self-issued intermediate certificates that may
follow this certificate in a valid certification path. (Note: The
last certificate in the certification path is not an intermediate
certificate, and is not included in this limit. Usually, the last
certificate is an end entity certificate, but it can be a CA
certificate.)
This makes it clear that exclusion of self-issued certificates from
the path length count applies only to some *intermediate* CA
certificates. A leaf certificate whether it has identical issuer
and subject or whether it is a CA or not is never part of the
intermediate certificate count. The handling of all leaf certificates
must be the same, in the case of our code to post-increment the
path count by 1, so that we ultimately reach a non-self-issued
intermediate it will be the first one (not zeroth) in the chain
of intermediates.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit ed422a2d01)
Change all calls to getenv() inside libcrypto to use a new wrapper function
that use secure_getenv() if available and an issetugid then getenv if not.
CPU processor override flags are unchanged.
Extra checks for OPENSSL_issetugid() have been removed in favour of the
safe getenv.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7047)
(cherry picked from commit 5c39a55d04)
gcc 4.6 (arguably erroneously) warns about our use of 'free' as
the name of a function parameter, when --strict-warnings is enabled:
crypto/x509/x509_meth.c: In function 'X509_LOOKUP_meth_set_free':
crypto/x509/x509_meth.c:61:12: error: declaration of 'free' shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [crypto/x509/x509_meth.o] Error 1
(gcc 4.8 is fine with this code, as are newer compilers.)
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6991)
In some cases it's about redundant check for return value, in some
cases it's about replacing check for -1 with comparison to 0.
Otherwise compiler might generate redundant check for <-1. [Even
formatting and readability fixes.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6860)
Documentation says "at most B<len> bytes will be written", which
formally doesn't prohibit zero. But if zero B<len> was passed, the
call to memcpy was bound to crash.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6860)
OpenSSL 1.1.0 made the X509_LOOKUP_METHOD structure opaque, so
applications that were previously able to define a custom lookup method
are not able to be ported.
This commit adds getters and setters for each of the current fields of
X509_LOOKUP_METHOD, along with getters and setters on several associated
opaque types (such as X509_LOOKUP and X509_OBJECT).
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6152)
Only check the CN against DNS name contraints if the
`X509_CHECK_FLAG_NEVER_CHECK_SUBJECT` flag is not set, and either the
certificate has no DNS subject alternative names or the
`X509_CHECK_FLAG_ALWAYS_CHECK_SUBJECT` flag is set.
Add pertinent documentation, and touch up some stale text about
name checks and DANE.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
If the lengths of both names is 0 then don't attempt to do a memcmp.
Issue reported by Simon Friedberger, Robert Merget and Juraj Somorovsky.
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6291)
A previous change of this function introduced a fragility when the
destination happens to be the same as the source. Such alias isn't
recommended, but could still happen, for example in this kind of code:
X509_NAME *subject = X509_get_issuer_name(x);
/* ... some code passes ... */
X509_set_issuer_name(x, subject);
Fixes#4710
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6280)
The X509_STORE_CTX_init() docs explicitly allow a NULL parameter for the
X509_STORE. Therefore we shouldn't crash if we subsequently call
X509_verify_cert() and no X509_STORE has been set.
Fixes#2462
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6001)
The wrong "set" field was incremented in the wrong place and would
create a new RDN, not a multi-valued RDN.
RDN inserts would happen after not before.
Prepending an entry to an RDN incorrectly created a new RDN
Anything which built up an X509_NAME could get a messed-up structure,
which would then be "wrong" for anyone using that name.
Thanks to Ingo Schwarze for extensive debugging and the initial
fix (documented in GitHub issue #5870).
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5882)
This removes some code because we cannot trace the original contributor
to get their agreement for the licence change (original commit e03ddfae).
After this change there will be numerous failures in the test cases until
someone rewrites the missing code.
All *_free functions should accept a NULL parameter. After this change
the following *_free functions will fail if a NULL parameter is passed:
BIO_ACCEPT_free()
BIO_CONNECT_free()
BN_BLINDING_free()
BN_CTX_free()
BN_MONT_CTX_free()
BN_RECP_CTX_free()
BUF_MEM_free()
COMP_CTX_free()
ERR_STATE_free()
TXT_DB_free()
X509_STORE_free()
ssl3_free()
ssl_cert_free()
SSL_SESSION_free()
SSL_free()
[skip ci]
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5757)
This adds all of the relevant EVP plumbing required to make
X448 and Ed448 work.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5481)
X509v3_add_ext: free 'sk' if the memory pointed to by it
was malloc-ed inside this function.
X509V3_EXT_add_nconf_sk: return an error if X509v3_add_ext() fails.
This prevents use of a freed memory in do_body:sk_X509_EXTENSION_num().
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4698)
