Submitted by: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@randombit.net>, "Mounir IDRASSI" <mounir.idrassi@idrix.net>, steve
Reviewed by: steve
As required by RFC4492 an absent supported points format by a server is
not an error: it should be treated as equivalent to an extension only
containing uncompressed.
initial connection to unpatched servers. There are no additional security
concerns in doing this as clients don't see renegotiation during an
attack anyway.
work in SSLv3: initial handshake has no extensions but includes MCSV, if
server indicates RI support then renegotiation handshakes include RI.
NB: current MCSV value is bogus for testing only, will be updated when we
have an official value.
Change mismatch alerts to handshake_failure as required by spec.
Also have some debugging fprintfs so we can clearly see what is going on
if OPENSSL_RI_DEBUG is set.
Fix double-free in TLS server name extensions which could lead to a remote
crash found by Codenomicon TLS test suite (CVE-2008-0891)
Reviewed by: openssl-security@openssl.org
Obtained from: jorton@redhat.com
of handshake failure
2. Changes to x509_certificate_type function (crypto/x509/x509type.c) to
make it recognize GOST certificates as EVP_PKT_SIGN|EVP_PKT_EXCH
(required for s3_srvr to accept GOST client certificates).
3. Changes to EVP
- adding of function EVP_PKEY_CTX_get0_peerkey
- Make function EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peerkey work for context with
ENCRYPT operation, because we use peerkey field in the context to
pass non-ephemeral secret key to GOST encrypt operation.
- added EVP_PKEY_CTRL_SET_IV control command. It is really
GOST-specific, but it is used in SSL code, so it has to go
in some header file, available during libssl compilation
4. Fix to HMAC to avoid call of OPENSSL_cleanse on undefined data
5. Include des.h if KSSL_DEBUG is defined into some libssl files, to
make debugging output which depends on constants defined there, work
and other KSSL_DEBUG output fixes
6. Declaration of real GOST ciphersuites, two authentication methods
SSL_aGOST94 and SSL_aGOST2001 and one key exchange method SSL_kGOST
7. Implementation of these methods.
8. Support for sending unsolicited serverhello extension if GOST
ciphersuite is selected. It is require for interoperability with
CryptoPro CSP 3.0 and 3.6 and controlled by
SSL_OP_CRYPTOPRO_TLSEXT_BUG constant.
This constant is added to SSL_OP_ALL, because it does nothing, if
non-GOST ciphersuite is selected, and all implementation of GOST
include compatibility with CryptoPro.
9. Support for CertificateVerify message without length field. It is
another CryptoPro bug, but support is made unconditional, because it
does no harm for draft-conforming implementation.
10. In tls1_mac extra copy of stream mac context is no more done.
When I've written currently commited code I haven't read
EVP_DigestSignFinal manual carefully enough and haven't noticed that
it does an internal digest ctx copying.
This implementation was tested against
1. CryptoPro CSP 3.6 client and server
2. Cryptopro CSP 3.0 server
(draft-rescorla-tls-opaque-prf-input-00.txt), and do some cleanups and
bugfixes on the way. In particular, this fixes the buffer bounds
checks in ssl_add_clienthello_tlsext() and in ssl_add_serverhello_tlsext().
Note that the opaque PRF Input TLS extension is not compiled by default;
see CHANGES.
This change resolves a number of problems and obviates multiple kludges.
A new feature is that you can now say "AES256" or "AES128" (not just
"AES", which enables both).
In some cases the ciphersuite list generated from a given string is
affected by this change. I hope this is just in those cases where the
previous behaviour did not make sense.
designed for that. This removes the potential error to mix data and
function pointers.
Please note that I'm a little unsure how incorrect calls to the old
ctrl functions should be handled, in som cases. I currently return 0
and that's it, but it may be more correct to generate a genuine error
in those cases.
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b
2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
.2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
