Ralf S. Engelschall
cdb8115660
Solaris 2.6 makes still problems.
...
Details were posted.
1999-03-08 12:56:07 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
6b50354041
typo
1999-03-08 12:39:41 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
54d9976c79
Let us start with some platform test list...
1999-03-08 12:13:35 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a5e035b54a
Notice freeze state and update my entry
1999-03-08 09:43:53 +00:00
Ben Laurie
726bae3f0f
Supper's cooking.
1999-02-28 20:51:38 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
090db4f475
Remember one more wish from the users
1999-02-25 14:44:55 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
189b6a6062
Remember some open issues and available patches
1999-02-21 12:33:58 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a67a9694f7
Ok, propose a release date of March 15th with a code freeze a few days before
...
so we have enough time for final testing and tarball rolling.
1999-02-20 16:50:53 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
d5083e0142
What is on my ToDo list...
1999-02-10 09:47:05 +00:00
Mark J. Cox
6ccec43933
add what I'm doing and a vote
...
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
1999-02-01 08:18:31 +00:00
Dr. Stephen Henson
679ab7c39e
Update STATUS, modify ssl.h so mkdef.pl will pick up prototypes and
...
add x509v3.h to mkdef.pl list of include files.
1999-01-30 17:35:01 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
4c441f30bb
Update
1999-01-30 12:06:16 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
69d1dfba24
Start keeping track of wishes people make on our mailing lists to make sure we
...
don't forget them and this way we have them bundled together.
1999-01-21 13:01:20 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
2ec077d87e
A few train of thoughts about the build procedure mess
1999-01-02 16:28:51 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
96e479e360
cleanup of apps/ and an answer
1999-01-01 15:58:14 +00:00
Paul C. Sutton
68a8a41bef
Add votes
1999-01-01 14:13:59 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
c1374a7dc0
A hint about the license
1998-12-31 12:52:23 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
a6f20a1e01
Some issues for voting
1998-12-31 12:14:27 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
9cb0969f65
Fix version stuff:
...
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b
2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
.2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
1998-12-31 09:36:40 +00:00
Ralf S. Engelschall
75b8dfc068
Create a STATUS file to coordinate us. Feel free to edit
1998-12-30 09:08:05 +00:00
