This commit exposes the cipher's IV to applications.
Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <yang.yang@baishancloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5253)
Previously, the API version limit was indicated with a numeric version
number. This was "natural" in the pre-3.0.0 because the version was
this simple number.
With 3.0.0, the version is divided into three separate numbers, and
it's only the major number that counts, but we still need to be able
to support pre-3.0.0 version limits.
Therefore, we allow OPENSSL_API_COMPAT to be defined with a pre-3.0.0
style numeric version number or with a simple major number, i.e. can
be defined like this for any application:
-D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=0x10100000L
-D OPENSSL_API_COMPAT=3
Since the pre-3.0.0 numerical version numbers are high, it's easy to
distinguish between a simple major number and a pre-3.0.0 numerical
version number and to thereby support both forms at the same time.
Internally, we define the following macros depending on the value of
OPENSSL_API_COMPAT:
OPENSSL_API_0_9_8
OPENSSL_API_1_0_0
OPENSSL_API_1_1_0
OPENSSL_API_3
They indicate that functions marked for deprecation in the
corresponding major release shall not be built if defined.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7724)
Rather than relying only on mandatory default digests, add a way for
the EVP_PKEY to individually report whether each digest algorithm is
supported.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7408)
Remove GMAC demo program because it has been superceded by the EVP MAC one
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7548)
The EVP_PKEY methods for CMAC and HMAC needed a rework, although it
wasn't much change apart from name changes.
This also meant that EVP_PKEY_new_CMAC_key() needed an adjustment.
(the possibility to rewrite this function to work with any MAC is yet
to be explored)
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7484)
These functions are generalizations of EVP_PKEY_CTX_str2ctrl() and
EVP_PKEY_CTX_hex2ctrl(). They will parse the value, and then pass the
parsed result and length to a callback that knows exactly how to pass
them on to a main _ctrl function, along with a context structure
pointer.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7393)
The MAC EVP_PKEY implementations are currently implemented for each
MAC. However, with the EVP_MAC API, only one such implementation is
needed.
This implementation takes into account the differences between HMAC
and CMAC implementations, and observes that all other current MAC
implementations seem to follow the HMAC model.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7393)
We currently implement EVP MAC methods as EVP_PKEY methods. This
change creates a separate EVP API for MACs, to replace the current
EVP_PKEY ones.
A note about this EVP API and how it interfaces with underlying MAC
implementations:
Other EVP APIs pass the EVP API context down to implementations, and
it can be observed that the implementations use the pointer to their
own private data almost exclusively. The EVP_MAC API deviates from
that pattern by passing the pointer to the implementation's private
data directly, and thereby deny the implementations access to the
EVP_MAC context structure. This change is made to provide a clearer
separation between the EVP library itself and the implementations of
its supported algorithm classes.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7393)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7277)
limit is ever reached.
This is a FIPS 140-2 requirement from IG A.5 "Key/IV Pair Uniqueness
Requirements from SP 800-38D".
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7129)
Add a check that the two keys used for AES-XTS are different.
One test case uses the same key for both of the AES-XTS keys. This causes
a failure under FIP 140-2 IG A.9. Mark the test as returning a failure.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7120)
zero-length ID is allowed, but it's not allowed to skip the ID.
Fixes: #6534
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7113)
Thus users can use this function to set customized EVP_PKEY_CTX to
EVP_MD_CTX structure.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7113)
In some cases it's about redundant check for return value, in some
cases it's about replacing check for -1 with comparison to 0.
Otherwise compiler might generate redundant check for <-1. [Even
formatting and readability fixes.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6860)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5935)
Fixes#6800
Replaces #5418
This commit reverts commit 7876dbffce and moves the check for a
zero-length input down the callstack into sha3_update().
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6838)
Improvement coefficients vary with TLS fragment length and platform, on
most Intel processors maximum improvement is ~50%, while on Ryzen - 80%.
The "secret" is new dedicated ChaCha20_128 code path and vectorized xor
helpers.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6638)
Inputs not longer than 64 bytes are processed ~10% faster, longer
lengths not divisble by 64, e.g. 255, up to ~20%. Unfortunately it's
impossible to measure with apps/speed.c, -aead benchmarks TLS-like
call sequence, but not exact. It took specially crafted code path...
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6597)
Use EVP_PKEY_set_alias_type to access
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6443)
Only applies to algorithms that support it. Both raw private and public
keys can be obtained for X25519, Ed25519, X448, Ed448. Raw private keys
only can be obtained for HMAC, Poly1305 and SipHash
Fixes#6259
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6394)
Even though calls can be viewed as styling improvement, they do come
with cost. It's not big cost and shows only on short inputs, but it is
measurable, 2-3% on some platforms.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6312)
Historically we used to implement standalone base64 code for SRP. This
was replaced by commit 3d3f21aa with the standard base64 processing code.
However, the SRP base64 code was designed to be compatible with other SRP
libraries (notably libsrp, but also others) that use a variant of standard
base64. Specifically a different alphabet is used and no padding '='
characters are used. Instead 0 padding is added to the front of the string.
By changing to standard base64 we change the behaviour of the API which may
impact interoperability. It also means that SRP verifier files created prior
to 1.1.1 would not be readable in 1.1.1 and vice versa.
Instead we expand our standard base64 processing with the capability to be
able to read and generate the SRP base64 variant.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5925)
Previously they were using EVP_EncodeBlock/EVP_DecodeBlock. These are low
level functions that do not handle padding characters. This was causing
the SRP code to fail. One side effect of using EVP_EncodeUpdate is that
it inserts newlines which is not what we need in SRP so we add a flag to
avoid that.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5925)
