7c6c052e68
a low profile, so we don't get discontinuity in the numbering...)
32 lines
1.2 KiB
C
32 lines
1.2 KiB
C
#ifndef HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
|
|
#define HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
|
|
|
|
/* Numeric release version identifier:
|
|
* MMNNFFPPS: major minor fix patch status
|
|
* The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
|
|
* 1 to 14, and f for release. The patch level is exactly that.
|
|
* For example:
|
|
* 0.9.3-dev 0x00903000
|
|
* 0.9.3-beta1 0x00903001
|
|
* 0.9.3-beta2-dev 0x00903002
|
|
* 0.9.3-beta2 0x00903002 (same as ...beta2-dev)
|
|
* 0.9.3 0x0090300f
|
|
* 0.9.3a 0x0090301f
|
|
* 0.9.4 0x0090400f
|
|
* 1.2.3z 0x102031af
|
|
*
|
|
* For continuity reasons (because 0.9.5 is already out, and is coded
|
|
* 0x00905100), between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 the coding of the patch level
|
|
* part is slightly different, by setting the highest bit. This means
|
|
* that 0.9.5a looks like this: 0x0090581f. At 0.9.6, we can start
|
|
* with 0x0090600S...
|
|
*
|
|
* (Prior to 0.9.3-dev a different scheme was used: 0.9.2b is 0x0922.)
|
|
* (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
|
|
* major minor fix final patch/beta)
|
|
*/
|
|
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00905820L
|
|
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT "OpenSSL 0.9.5b-dev 1 Apr 2000"
|
|
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT
|
|
|
|
#endif /* HEADER_OPENSSLV_H */
|