This avoids having to do it at all the places we want cached responses.
We can't inject the ITimeFactor without breaking public API.
However we can perfectly overwrite the service (resulting in the same
testable effect).
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This makes the new `@BruteForceProtection` annotation more clever and moves the relevant code into it's own middleware.
Basically you can now set `@BruteForceProtection(action=$key)` as annotation and that will make the controller bruteforce protected. However, the difference to before is that you need to call `$responmse->throttle()` to increase the counter. Before the counter was increased every time which leads to all kind of unexpected problems.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
Fixes#3890
If we do a put request without a body the current code still tries to
read the body. This patch makes sure that we do not try to read the body
if the content length is 0.
See RFC 2616 Section 4.3
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
CSP nonces are a feature available with CSP v2. Basically instead of saying "JS resources from the same domain are ok to be served" we now say "Ressources from everywhere are allowed as long as they add a `nonce` attribute to the script tag with the right nonce.
At the moment the nonce is basically just a `<?php p(base64_encode($_['requesttoken'])) ?>`, we have to decode the requesttoken since `:` is not an allowed value in the nonce. So if somebody does on their own include JS files (instead of using the `addScript` public API, they now must also include that attribute.)
IE does currently not implement CSP v2, thus there is a whitelist included that delivers the new CSP v2 policy to newer browsers. Check http://caniuse.com/#feat=contentsecuritypolicy2 for the current browser support list. An alternative approach would be to just add `'unsafe-inline'` as well as `'unsafe-inline'` is ignored by CSPv2 when a nonce is set. But this would make this security feature unusable at all in IE. Not worth it at the moment IMO.
Implementing this offers the following advantages:
1. **Security:** As we host resources from the same domain by design we don't have to worry about 'self' anymore being in the whitelist
2. **Performance:** We can move oc.js again to inline JS. This makes the loading way quicker as we don't have to load on every load of a new web page a blocking dynamically non-cached JavaScript file.
If you want to toy with CSP see also https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
Signed-off-by: Lukas Reschke <lukas@statuscode.ch>
Having two code paths for this is unreliable and can lead to bugs. Also, in some cases Apache isn't setting the PATH_INFO variable when mod_rewrite is used.
Fixes https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/983
OVH has implemented load balancing in a very questionable way where the reverse proxy actually internally adds some cookies which would trigger a security exception. To work around this, this change only checks for the session cookie.
* Move a-b to PSR-4
* Move c-d to PSR-4
* Move e+g to PSR-4
* Move h-l to PSR-4
* Move m-r to PSR-4
* Move s-u to PSR-4
* Move files/ to PSR-4
* Move remaining tests to PSR-4
* Remove Test\ from old autoloader
