The "FileListContext" provides steps to interact with and check the
behaviour of a file list. However, the "FileListContext" does not know
the right file list ancestor that has to be used by the file list steps,
so until now the file list steps were explicitly wired to the Files app
and they could be used only in that case.
Instead of duplicating the steps with a slightly different name (for
example, "I create a new folder named :folderName in the public shared
folder" instead of "I create a new folder named :folderName") the steps
were generalized; now contexts that "know" that certain file list
ancestor has to be used by the FileListContext steps performed by
certain actor from that point on (until changed again) set it
explicitly. For example, when the current page is the Files app then the
ancestor of the file list is the main view of the current section of the
Files app, but when the current page is a shared link then the ancestor
is set to null (because there will be just one file list, and thus its
ancestor is not relevant to differentiate between instances)
A helper trait, "FileListAncestorSetter", was introduced to reduce the
boilerplate needed to set the file list ancestor from other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The file list is used in other places besides the Files app (for
example, the File sharing app); in those cases the locators for the file
list elements are the same, but not for the ancestor of the file list.
To make possible to reuse the file list locators in those cases too now
they receive the ancestor to use.
Note that the locators for the file actions menu were not using an
ancestor locator because it is expected that there is only one file
actions menu at a time in the whole page; that may change in the future,
but for the time being it is a valid assumption and thus the ancestor
was not added to those locators in this commit.
Although the locators were generalized the steps themselves still use
the "FilesAppContext::currentSectionMainView" locator as ancestor; the
steps will be generalized in a following commit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Besides the extraction some minor adjustments (sorting locators for file
action menu entries to reflect the order of the menu entries in the UI,
moving parametrized locators like "createMenuItemFor" above the locators
that use them and placing "descendantOf" calls always in a new line)
were made too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
NoSuchElement exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
StaleElementReference exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2
driver for Mink performs an action on an element through the WebDriver
session instead of directly through the WebDriver element. In that case,
if the element with the given ID does not exist, a NoSuchElement
exception would be thrown instead of a StaleElementReference exception,
so those cases are handled like StaleElementReference exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of
ElementNotVisible exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2 driver
for Mink moves the cursor on an element using the "moveto" method of the
Webdriver session, for example, before clicking on an element. In that
case, if the element is not visible, "moveto" would throw a
MoveTargetOutOfBounds exception instead of an ElementNotVisible
exception, so those cases are handled like ElementNotVisible exceptions.
Note that MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions could be thrown too if the
element was visible but "out of reach"; there is no problem in handling
those cases as if the element was not visible, as the exception will be
thrown again anyway once it is verified that the element is indeed
visible.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
if file_get_contents fails remove the file. And traverse up the tree
checking if the other folders are there.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
This is more of a hack. But one of the nodes won't properly run this. No
sense in waiting 60 minutes
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
