* Order the imports
* No leading slash on imports
* Empty line before namespace
* One line per import
* Empty after imports
* Emmpty line at bottom of file
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Since federated shares have their permissions set on the node, we do not need
to check for parent share permissions. Otherwise reshares of incoming federated
have no permission variable defined and creating them will fail
Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
The update share tests only checked that the share returned by
"update()" had the expected values. However, as "update()" returns the
same share that was given as a parameter the tests were not really
verifying that the values were updated in the database.
In a similar way, the test that checked that a password was removed did
not set a password first, so even if the database returned null it could
be simply returning the default value for the share; a password must be
set first to ensure that it is removed.
Besides that, a typo was fixed too that made the checks on the original
share instead of on the one returned by "update()"; right now it is the
same share, so the change makes no difference, but it is how the check
should be done anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Tokens will be used to give access to a share to guests in public rooms.
Although the token itself is created in the provider of room shares and
no changes are needed for that, due to the code structure it is
necessary to explicitly call the provider from the manager when getting
a room share by token.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
When a password was set for a mail share an e-mail was sent to the
recipient with the password. Now the e-mail is no longer sent if the
password is meant to be sent by Talk.
However, before the e-mail was not sent when the share was updated but
the password was not changed. Now an e-mail is sent in that case too if
switching from a password sent by Talk to a password sent by mail.
On the other hand, when switching from a password sent by mail to a
password sent by Talk it is mandatory to change the password; otherwise
the recipient would already have access to the share without having to
call the sharer to verify her identity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
* Now listeners for those events get proper share objects.
* Legacy hooks still fired
* Updated tests
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
- This kind of hook signal used to be emitted in the old Share library but it was missing from Share 2.0
Signed-off-by: Pauli Järvinen <pauli.jarvinen@gmail.com>
- When a file was unshared, the legacy hook pre_unshare fired twice and the hook post_unshare did not fire at all. This was obviously a copy-paste error.
Signed-off-by: Pauli Järvinen <pauli.jarvinen@gmail.com>
The plain text password for a shared links was hashed and, then, the
hashed password was hashed again and set as the final password. Due to
this the password introduced in the "Authenticate" page for the shared
link was always a wrong password, and thus the file could not be
accessed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
* Each provider just returns what they have so adding an element won't
require changing everything
* Added tests
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
* This allows for effective queries.
* Introduce currentAccess parameter to speciy if the users needs to have
currently acces (deleted incomming group share). (For notifications)
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Use a helper class to listen to the eventDispatcher calls from the share
manager to emit the old \OC_Hooks
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
