Because proxy certificates typically come without any CRL information,
trying to check revocation on them will fail. Better not to try
checking such information for them at all.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Remove current_method: it was intended as a means of retrying
lookups bit it was never used. Now that X509_verify_cert() is
a "one shot" operation it can never work as intended.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Since there are a number of function pointers in X509_STORE that might
lead to user code, it makes sense for them to be able to lock the
store while they do their work.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
We only add setters for X509_STORE function pointers except for the
verify callback function. The thought is that the function pointers
in X509_STORE_CTX are a cache for the X509_STORE functions.
Therefore, it's preferable if the user makes the changes in X509_STORE
before X509_STORE_CTX_init is called, and otherwise use the verify
callback to override any results from OpenSSL's internal
calculations.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
If two CRLs are equivalent then use the one with a later lastUpdate field:
this will result in the newest CRL available being used.
RT#4615
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Fix some indentation at the same time
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1292)
In light of potential UKS (unknown key share) attacks on some
applications, primarily browsers, despite RFC761, name checks are
by default applied with DANE-EE(3) TLSA records. Applications for
which UKS is not a problem can optionally disable DANE-EE(3) name
checks via the new SSL_CTX_dane_set_flags() and friends.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
New hostname checking function asn1_valid_host()
Check commonName entries against nameConstraints: any CN components in
EE certificate which look like hostnames are checked against
nameConstraints.
Note that RFC5280 et al only require checking subject alt name against
DNS name constraints.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
When the proxy cert code was initially added, some application authors
wanted to get them verified without having to change their code, so a
check of the env var OPENSSL_ALLOW_PROXY_CERTS was added.
Since then, the use of this variable has become irrelevant, as it's
likely that code has been changed since, so it's time it gets removed.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
While travelling up the certificate chain, the internal
proxy_path_length must be updated with the pCPathLengthConstraint
value, or verification will not work properly. This corresponds to
RFC 3820, 4.1.4 (a).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
The subject name MUST be the same as the issuer name, with a single CN
entry added.
RT#1852
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1074)
Since with SSL_VERIFY_NONE, the connection may continue and the
session may even be cached, we should save some evidence that the
chain was not sufficiently verified and would have been rejected
with SSL_VERIFY_PEER. To that end when a CT callback returs failure
we set the verify result to X509_V_ERR_NO_VALID_SCTS.
Note: We only run the CT callback in the first place if the verify
result is still X509_V_OK prior to start of the callback.
RT #4502
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Set ctx->error = X509_V_ERR_OUT_OF_MEM when verificaiton cannot
continue due to malloc failure. Also, when X509_verify_cert()
returns <= 0 make sure that the verification status does not remain
X509_V_OK, as a last resort set it it to X509_V_ERR_UNSPECIFIED,
just in case some code path returns an error without setting an
appropriate value of ctx->error.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
An if checks the value of |type| to see if it is V_ASN1_VISIBLESTRING
twice. We only need to do it once.
GitHub Issue #656
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Add a status return value instead of void.
Add some sanity checks on reference counter value.
Update the docs.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
The name length limit check in x509_name_ex_d2i() includes
the containing structure as well as the actual X509_NAME. This will
cause large CRLs to be rejected.
Fix by limiting the length passed to ASN1_item_ex_d2i() which will
then return an error if the passed X509_NAME exceeds the length.
RT#4531
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
ASN1 Strings that are over 1024 bytes can cause an overread in
applications using the X509_NAME_oneline() function on EBCDIC systems.
This could result in arbitrary stack data being returned in the buffer.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
CVE-2016-2176
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Sanity check field lengths and sums to avoid potential overflows and reject
excessively large X509_NAME structures.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
This adds an explicit limit to the size of an X509_NAME structure. Some
part of OpenSSL (e.g. TLS) already effectively limit the size due to
restrictions on certificate size.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
The length is a long, so returning the difference does not quite work.
Thanks to Torbjörn Granlund for noticing.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
OpenSSL 1.1.0-pre5 has made some additional structs opaque. Python's ssl
module requires access to some of the struct members. Three new getters
are added:
int X509_OBJECT_get_type(X509_OBJECT *a);
STACK_OF(X509_OBJECT) *X509_STORE_get0_objects(X509_STORE *v);
X509_VERIFY_PARAM *X509_STORE_get0_param(X509_STORE *ctx);
Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <cheimes@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Coverity reports a potential NULL deref when "2 0 0" DANE trust-anchors
from DNS are configured via SSL_dane_tlsa_add() and X509_STORE_CTX_init()
is called with a NULL stack of untrusted certificates.
Since ssl_verify_cert_chain() always provideds a non-NULL stack of
untrusted certs, and no other code path enables DANE, the problem
can only happen in applications that use SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback()
to implement their own wrappers around X509_verify_cert() passing
only the leaf certificate to the latter.
Regardless of the "improbability" of the problem, we do need to
ensure that build_chain() handles this case correctly.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Add X509_STORE_{set,get}_ex_data() function and
X509_STORE_get_ex_new_index() macro.
X509_STORE has ex_data and the documentation also mentions them but they
are not actually implemented.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
The i2d_X509() function can return a negative value on error. Therefore
we should make sure we check it.
Issue reported by Yuan Jochen Kang.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
The Unix build was the last to retain the classic build scheme. The
new unified scheme has matured enough, even though some details may
need polishing.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Make OBJ_name_cmp internal
Rename idea_xxx to IDEA_xxx
Rename get_rfc_xxx to BN_get_rfc_xxx
Rename v3_addr and v3_asid functions to X509v3_...
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Make X509_OBJECT, X509_STORE_CTX, X509_STORE, X509_LOOKUP,
and X509_LOOKUP_METHOD opaque.
Remove unused X509_CERT_FILE_CTX
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
A new X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_auth_level() function sets the
authentication security level. For verification of SSL peers, this
is automatically set from the SSL security level. Otherwise, for
now, the authentication security level remains at (effectively) 0
by default.
The new "-auth_level" verify(1) option is available in all the
command-line tools that support the standard verify(1) options.
New verify(1) tests added to check enforcement of chain signature
and public key security levels. Also added new tests of enforcement
of the verify_depth limit.
Updated documentation.
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Don't decode a public key in X509_PUBKEY_get0(): that is handled when
the key is parsed using x509_pubkey_decode() instead.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Cache the decoded public key when an X509_PUBKEY structure is initially
parsed so no locking is required. Ignore any decode errors.
When an application calls X509_PUBKEY_get0() subsequently it will either
get the cached key or the decode operation will be repeated which will
return an appropriate error.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Previously, it was sufficient to have certSign in keyUsage when the
basicConstraints extension was missing. That is still accepted in
a trust anchor, but is no longer accepted in an intermediate CA.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Don't have #error statements in header files, but instead wrap
the contents of that file in #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_xxx
This means it is now always safe to include the header file.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
The locking here is a bit strange and unclear. Rather than refactor
anything and possibly break stuff I have just moved to using the new
thread API following as closely as possible what was there previously.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
This takes us away from the idea that we know exactly how our static
libraries are going to get used. Instead, we make them available to
build shareable things with, be it other shared libraries or DSOs.
On the other hand, we also have greater control of when the shared
library cflags. They will never be used with object files meant got
binaries, such as apps/openssl or test/test*.
With unified, we take this a bit further and prepare for having to
deal with extra cflags specifically to be used with DSOs (dynamic
engines), libraries and binaries (applications).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
