The definition of STITCHED_CALL relies on OPENSSL_NO_ASM. However,
when a configuration simply lacks the assembler implementation for RC4
(which is where we have implemented the stitched call), OPENSSL_NO_ASM
isn't implemented. Better, then, to rely on specific macros that
indicated that RC4 (and MD5) are implemented in assembler.
For this to work properly, we must also make sure Configure adds the
definition of RC4_ASM among the C flags.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
extra spacing and 80 cols
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1366)
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
in EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate. It is argued that in
general case it's impossible to provide guarantee that partially[!]
overlapping buffers can be tolerated.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
aesni_cbc_hmac_sha256_ctrl() and aesni_cbc_hmac_sha1_ctrl() cleanse the
HMAC key after use, but static int rc4_hmac_md5_ctrl() doesn't.
Fixes an OCAP Audit issue.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Before the addition of this function, it was impossible to read the
symmetric key from an EVP_PKEY_HMAC type EVP_PKEY.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1217)
Previously EVP_EncodeUpdate returned a void. However there are a couple
of error conditions that can occur. Therefore the return type has been
changed to an int, with 0 indicating error and 1 indicating success.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Don't copy parameters is they're already present in the destination.
Return error if an attempt is made to copy different parameters to
destination. Update documentation.
If key type is not initialised return missing parameters
RT#4149
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
This compiles correctly, but depending on what may be defined, it's
possible that this could fail compilation. The braces are mismatched,
and it's possible to end up with an else followed by another else.
This presumes the indentation is mostly correct and indicative of
intent. Found via static analysis.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1118)
ossl_hmac_cleanup, pkey_hmac_cleanup:
- allow to invoke with NULL data
- using EVP_PKEY_CTX_[get|set]_data
EVP_DigestInit_ex:
- remove additional check for ‘type’ and doing clear free instead of
free
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
chacha20_poly1305_init_key() dereferences NULL when called with inkey !=
NULL && iv == NULL. This function is called by EVP_EncryptInit_ex()
family, whose documentation allows setting key and iv in separate calls.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Add a status return value instead of void.
Add some sanity checks on reference counter value.
Update the docs.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
- Missing checks for allocation failure.
- releasing memory in few missing error paths
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
With the EVP_EncodeUpdate function it is the caller's responsibility to
determine how big the output buffer should be. The function writes the
amount actually used to |*outl|. However this could go negative with a
sufficiently large value for |inl|. We add a check for this error
condition.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
An overflow can occur in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function which is used for
Base64 encoding of binary data. If an attacker is able to supply very large
amounts of input data then a length check can overflow resulting in a heap
corruption. Due to the very large amounts of data involved this will most
likely result in a crash.
Internally to OpenSSL the EVP_EncodeUpdate function is primarly used by the
PEM_write_bio* family of functions. These are mainly used within the
OpenSSL command line applications, so any application which processes
data from an untrusted source and outputs it as a PEM file should be
considered vulnerable to this issue.
User applications that call these APIs directly with large amounts of
untrusted data may also be vulnerable.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
CVE-2016-2105
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
An overflow can occur in the EVP_EncryptUpdate function. If an attacker is
able to supply very large amounts of input data after a previous call to
EVP_EncryptUpdate with a partial block then a length check can overflow
resulting in a heap corruption.
Following an analysis of all OpenSSL internal usage of the
EVP_EncryptUpdate function all usage is one of two forms.
The first form is like this:
EVP_EncryptInit()
EVP_EncryptUpdate()
i.e. where the EVP_EncryptUpdate() call is known to be the first called
function after an EVP_EncryptInit(), and therefore that specific call
must be safe.
The second form is where the length passed to EVP_EncryptUpdate() can be
seen from the code to be some small value and therefore there is no
possibility of an overflow.
Since all instances are one of these two forms, I believe that there can
be no overflows in internal code due to this problem.
It should be noted that EVP_DecryptUpdate() can call EVP_EncryptUpdate()
in certain code paths. Also EVP_CipherUpdate() is a synonym for
EVP_EncryptUpdate(). Therefore I have checked all instances of these
calls too, and came to the same conclusion, i.e. there are no instances
in internal usage where an overflow could occur.
This could still represent a security issue for end user code that calls
this function directly.
CVE-2016-2106
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
