Send a TLS1.4 ClientHello with supported_versions and get TLS1.3
Send a TLS1.3 ClientHello without supported_versions and get TLS1.2
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
We can end up with a NULL SSL_METHOD function if a method has been
disabled. If that happens then we shouldn't call vent->smeth().
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Simple tests only need to implement register_tests().
Tests that need a custom main() should implement test_main(). This will
be wrapped in a main() that performs common setup/teardown (currently
crypto-mdebug).
Note that for normal development, enable-asan is usually
sufficient for detecting leaks, and more versatile.
enable-crypto-mdebug is stricter as it will also
insist that all static variables be freed. This is useful for debugging
library init/deinit; however, it also means that test_main() must free
everything it allocates.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Nothing is using this yet, it just adds the underlying functions necesary
for generating the TLS1.3 secrets.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Normally WPACKETs will use a BUF_MEM which can grow as required. Sometimes
though that may be overkill for what is needed - a static buffer may be
sufficient. This adds that capability.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
At the moment you can only do an HKDF Extract and Expand in one go. For
TLS1.3 we need to be able to do an Extract first, and the subsequently do
a number of Expand steps on the same PRK.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
There were a few places where they could be declared const so this commit
does that.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
The name and type of the argument to ssl_check_for_safari() has changed.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
The size if fixed by the protocol and won't change even if
sizeof(clienthello.random) does.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Add a blank line, take one away - due to feedback received during review.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
We should be freeing up the raw extension data after we've finished with it.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
In the case of an SSLv2 compat ClientHello we weren't setting up the
compression methods correctly, which could lead to uninit reads or crashes.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Having that code in one central object file turned out to cause
trouble when building test/modes_internal_test.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1883)
For consistency, it's better to use the perl that was specified to
Configure last time it was called.
Use case:
perl v5.8.8 was first along $PATH, perl v5.22.2 was available and
specified as: PERL=/opt/local/bin/perl ./config. When make wanted to
reconfigure and called './Configure reconf', configuration broke down,
complaining about a perl that's too old.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1884)
BN_RECP_CTX_new direclty use bn_init to avoid twice memset calls
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1879)
MD5/SHA1 and MDC-2 have special-case logic beyond the generic DigestInfo
wrapping. Test that each of these works, including hash and length
mismatches (both input and signature). Also add VerifyRecover tests. It
appears 5824cc2981 added support for
VerifyRecover, but forgot to add the test data.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
PKCS #1 v2.0 is the name of a document which specifies an algorithm
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5, often referred to as "PKCS #1 v1.5" after an earlier
document which specified it. This gets further confusing because the
document PKCS #1 v2.1 specifies two signature algorithms,
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 and RSASSA-PSS. RSA_sign implements RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5.
Refer to the document using the RFC number which is easier to find
anyway, and refer to the algorithm by its name.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
RFC 3447, section 8.2.2, steps 3 and 4 states that verifiers must encode
the DigestInfo struct and then compare the result against the public key
operation result. This implies that one and only one encoding is legal.
OpenSSL instead parses with crypto/asn1, then checks that the encoding
round-trips, and allows some variations for the parameter. Sufficient
laxness in this area can allow signature forgeries, as described in
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/26/pkcs1.html
Although there aren't known attacks against OpenSSL's current scheme,
this change makes OpenSSL implement the algorithm as specified. This
avoids the uncertainty and, more importantly, helps grow a healthy
ecosystem. Laxness beyond the spec, particularly in implementations
which enjoy wide use, risks harm to the ecosystem for all. A signature
producer which only tests against OpenSSL may not notice bugs and
accidentally become widely deployed. Thus implementations have a
responsibility to honor the specification as tightly as is practical.
In some cases, the damage is permanent and the spec deviation and
security risk becomes a tax all implementors must forever pay, but not
here. Both BoringSSL and Go successfully implemented and deployed
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 as specified since their respective beginnings, so
this change should be compatible enough to pin down in future OpenSSL
releases.
See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00
As a bonus, by not having to deal with sign/verify differences, this
version is also somewhat clearer. It also more consistently enforces
digest lengths in the verify_recover codepath. The NID_md5_sha1 codepath
wasn't quite doing this right.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
