Most modules are direct implementations of openssl application
sub-commands, but some constitute a support library, which can be used
by more than one program (and is, incidently, by test/uitest).
For practical purposes, we place the support library modules in a
private, static library.
Finally, there are some modules that don't have direct references in
the rest of the apps code, but are still crucial. See them as some
kind of extra crt0 or similar for your platform.
Inspiration from David von Oheimb
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5222)
Everything in apps includes apps.h, because that one declares apps
internal library routines. However, progs.h doesn't declare library
routines, but rather the main commands and their options, and there's
no reason why the library modules should include it.
So, remove the inclusion of progs.h from apps.h and add that inclusion
in all command source files.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5222)
The behavior of resetting the init_lock value to NULL after
freeing it during OPENSSL_cleanup() was added as part of the
global lock commits that were just reverted, but there is desire
to retain this behavior for clarity.
It is unclear that the library would actually remain usable in
any form after OPENSSL_cleanup(), since the required re-initialization
occurs under a CRYPTO_ONCE check that cannot be reset at cleanup time.
That said, a NULL dereference is probably more friendly behavior
in these treacherous waters than using freed memory would be.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5089)
Conceptually, this is a squashed version of:
Revert "Address feedback"
This reverts commit 75551e07bd.
and
Revert "Add CRYPTO_thread_glock_new"
This reverts commit ed6b2c7938.
But there were some intervening commits that made neither revert apply
cleanly, so instead do it all as one shot.
The crypto global locks were an attempt to cope with the awkward
POSIX semantics for pthread_atfork(); its documentation (the "RATIONALE"
section) indicates that the expected usage is to have the prefork handler
lock all "global" locks, and the parent and child handlers release those
locks, to ensure that forking happens with a consistent (lock) state.
However, the set of functions available in the child process is limited
to async-signal-safe functions, and pthread_mutex_unlock() is not on
the list of async-signal-safe functions! The only synchronization
primitives that are async-signal-safe are the semaphore primitives,
which are not really appropriate for general-purpose usage.
However, the state consistency problem that the global locks were
attempting to solve is not actually a serious problem, particularly for
OpenSSL. That is, we can consider four cases of forking application
that might use OpenSSL:
(1) Single-threaded, does not call into OpenSSL in the child (e.g.,
the child calls exec() immediately)
For this class of process, no locking is needed at all, since there is
only ever a single thread of execution and the only reentrancy is due to
signal handlers (which are themselves limited to async-signal-safe
operation and should not be doing much work at all).
(2) Single-threaded, calls into OpenSSL after fork()
The application must ensure that it does not fork() with an unexpected
lock held (that is, one that would get unlocked in the parent but
accidentally remain locked in the child and cause deadlock). Since
OpenSSL does not expose any of its internal locks to the application
and the application is single-threaded, the OpenSSL internal locks
will be unlocked for the fork(), and the state will be consistent.
(OpenSSL will need to reseed its PRNG in the child, but that is
an orthogonal issue.) If the application makes use of locks from
libcrypto, proper handling for those locks is the responsibility of
the application, as for any other locking primitive that is available
for application programming.
(3) Multi-threaded, does not call into OpenSSL after fork()
As for (1), the OpenSSL state is only relevant in the parent, so
no particular fork()-related handling is needed. The internal locks
are relevant, but there is no interaction with the child to consider.
(4) Multi-threaded, calls into OpenSSL after fork()
This is the case where the pthread_atfork() hooks to ensure that all
global locks are in a known state across fork() would come into play,
per the above discussion. However, these "calls into OpenSSL after
fork()" are still subject to the restriction to async-signal-safe
functions. Since OpenSSL uses all sorts of locking and libc functions
that are not on the list of safe functions (e.g., malloc()), this
case is not currently usable and is unlikely to ever be usable,
independently of the locking situation. So, there is no need to
go through contortions to attempt to support this case in the one small
area of locking interaction with fork().
In light of the above analysis (thanks @davidben and @achernya), go
back to the simpler implementation that does not need to distinguish
"library-global" locks or to have complicated atfork handling for locks.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5089)
They aren't needed if all they do is set bio->init = 1 and zero other
fields that are already zeroed
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5223)
Without this, every BIO implementation is forced to have a create
method, just to set bio->init = 1.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5223)
Some older glibc versions require the `-lrt` linker option for
resolving the reference to `clock_gettime'. Since it is not desired
to add new library dependencies in version 1.1.1, the call to
clock_gettime() is replaced by a call to gettimeofday() for the
moment. It will be added back in version 1.2.
Signed-off-by: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5199)
INSTALL: Mention 'aria' algorithm for no-<alg>
Signed-off-by: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5215)
If a server receives an unexpected ClientHello then we may or may not
accept it. Make sure all such decisions are made in the state machine
and not in the record layer. This also removes a disparity between the
TLS and the DTLS code. The TLS code was making this decision in the
record layer, while the DTLS code was making it later.
Finally it also solves a problem where a warning alert was being sent
during tls_setup_handshake() and the function was returning a failure
return code. This is problematic because it can be called from a
transition function - which we only allow fatal errors to occur in.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5190)
For proper escaping, we need the direct perl variable values, not a
make variable reference.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5196)
This message will ONLY be visible in OpenSSL 1.1.1, it will not show
in 1.1.1a or any other release or update.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5185)
The additional possibility is:
perl configdata.pm --options Display the features, both
enabled and disabled, and
display defined macro and
skipped directories where
applicable.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5185)
The "make variable" information displayed by Configure was selective
and incomplete, and possibly undesirable (too verbose).
Instead, we make configdata.pm and have the user run it to get the
information they desire, and also make it possible to have it perform
a reconfiguration.
Possibilities so far:
perl configdata.pm --dump Displays everything (i.e. the
combined output from
--command-line, --environment,
--make-variables and
--build-parameters.
perl configdata.pm --command-line Displays the config command
line.
perl configdata.pm --envirnoment Displays the recorded
environment variables.
perl configdata.pm --make-variables Displays the configured "make
variables".
perl configdata.pm --build-parameters Displays the build file and
the template files to create
it.
perl configdata.pm --reconfigure Re-runs the configuration with
the recorded environment
variables.
--verbose can be used to have --reconfigure be a bit more verbose.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5185)
The rehash test broke the test if run by root. Instead, just skip the
check that requires non-root to be worth it.
Fixes#4387
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5184)
C++ flags got the same config target value as C flags, but then
nothing else happened while C flags get all kinds of stuff added to
them (especially when --strict-warnings is used).
Now, C++ flags get the exact same treatment as C flags. However, this
only happens when a C++ compiler is specified, to avoid confusing
messages about added C++ flags.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5181)
vc_wince_info()->{defines} was left around, when it should be
vc_wince_info()->{cppflags}
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5182)
There were a small number that inherited no BASE, the now inherit
BASE_unix.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Ideally, each config target should inherit a base to get their
platform specific defaults. Unfortunately, that is currently not the
case, so we duplicate the Unixly defaults from the BASE_unix template
into the DEFAULT template.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Default values belong in the DEFAULT config target template, in
Configurations/00-base-templates.conf.
This isn't a complete move, but takes care of the most blatant
examples.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Support the following "make variables":
AR (GNU compatible)
ARFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
AS (GNU Compatible)
ASFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CC (GNU Compatible)
CFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CXX (GNU Compatible)
CXXFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CPP (GNU Compatible)
CPPFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
CPPDEFINES List of CPP macro definitions. Alternative for -D
CPPINCLUDES List of CPP inclusion directories. Alternative for -I
HASHBANGPERL Perl invocation to be inserted after '#!' in public
perl scripts.
LDFLAGS (GNU Compatible)
LDLIBS (GNU Compatible)
RANLIB Program to generate library archive index
RC Program to manipulate Windows resources
RCFLAGS Flags for $(RC)
RM (GNU Compatible)
Setting one of these overrides the corresponding data from our config
targets. However, flags given directly on the configuration command
line are additional, and are therefore added to the flags coming from
one of the variables above or the config target.
Fixes#2420
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
C preprocessor flags get separated from C flags, which has the
advantage that we don't get loads of macro definitions and inclusion
directory specs when linking shared libraries, DSOs and programs.
This is a step to add support for "make variables" when configuring.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5177)
Make the sigalg name in comments reflect one that actually exists
in the draft standard.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5174)
The latest TLS 1.3 draft split the RSA-PSS signature schemes into
two versions that indicate the OID of the RSA key being used.
This forced us to rename the preprocessor defines for the sigalg
values, and the ssl-trace code was not adopted to match, since
it was not enabled int the default build.
Belatedly update the ssl_sigalg_tbl in the trace code to match.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5174)
The check for a duplicate value was reading one entry past
where it was supposed to, getting an uninitialized value.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5172)
We don't need to send this extension in normal operation since
we are our own X.509 library, but add some test cases that force
the extension to be sent and exercise our code to process the extension.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
The new extension is like signature_algorithms, but only for the
signature *on* the certificate we will present to the peer (the
old signature_algorithms extension is still used for signatures that
we *generate*, i.e., those over TLS data structures).
We do not need to generate this extension, since we are the same
implementation as our X.509 stack and can handle the same types
of signatures, but we need to be prepared to receive it, and use the received
information when selecting what certificate to present.
There is a lot of interplay between signature_algorithms_cert and
signature_algorithms, since both affect what certificate we can
use, and thus the resulting signature algorithm used for TLS messages.
So, apply signature_algorithms_cert (if present) as a filter on what
certificates we can consider when choosing a certificate+sigalg
pair.
As part of this addition, we also remove the fallback code that let
keys of type EVP_PKEY_RSA be used to generate RSA-PSS signatures -- the
new rsa_pss_pss_* and rsa_pss_rsae_* signature schemes have pulled
the key type into what is covered by the signature algorithm, so
we should not apply this sort of compatibility workaround.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
These functions can now take both "sig+hash" strings and
algorithm-specific identifiers like "rsa_pss_pss_sha256" that
indicate a particular entry from the TLS signature algorithm
registry.
Also clarify that only the "_list" form allows for the new-style names
(the non-"list" interfaces take sig and hasn NIDs, which cannot
access all of the new-style schemes).
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
Our historical SSL{,_CTX}_set_sigalgs() APIs take an array of
NID pairs (hash and signature), and our parser for manually
specifying unified sigalgs (that do not necessarily correspond
to an actual signature+hash pair) was transiting via (the implementation
of) this historical API. The TLS 1.3 draft-23 has introduced
signature schemes that have identical signature type and hash type,
differing only in the (RSA) public key OID, which prevents
the rsa_pss_pss_* schemes from being properly identified and
sent on the wire.
To fix the issue, parse sigalg strings directly into SIGALG_LOOKUP
objects, and pass around an array of uint16 wire protocol values
instead of NID pairs. The old interface is retained for API
compatibility but will become less and less useful with time.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
We now have a split in the signature algorithms codepoint space for
whether the certificate's key is for rsaEncryption or a PSS-specific
key, which should let us get rid of some special-casing that we
previously needed to try to coax rsaEncryption keys into performing PSS.
(This will be done in a subsequent commit.)
Send the new PSS-with-PSS-specific key first in our list, so that
we prefer the new technology to the old one.
We need to update the expected certificate type in one test,
since the "RSA-PSS+SHA256" form now corresponds to a public key
of type rsaEncryption, so we should expect the server certificate
type to be just "RSA". If we want to get a server certificate
type of "RSA-PSS", we need to use a new signature algorithm
that cannot be represented as signature+hash, so add a test for that
as well.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5068)
