The MAC EVP_PKEY implementations are currently implemented for each
MAC. However, with the EVP_MAC API, only one such implementation is
needed.
This implementation takes into account the differences between HMAC
and CMAC implementations, and observes that all other current MAC
implementations seem to follow the HMAC model.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7393)
We currently implement EVP MAC methods as EVP_PKEY methods. This
change creates a separate EVP API for MACs, to replace the current
EVP_PKEY ones.
A note about this EVP API and how it interfaces with underlying MAC
implementations:
Other EVP APIs pass the EVP API context down to implementations, and
it can be observed that the implementations use the pointer to their
own private data almost exclusively. The EVP_MAC API deviates from
that pattern by passing the pointer to the implementation's private
data directly, and thereby deny the implementations access to the
EVP_MAC context structure. This change is made to provide a clearer
separation between the EVP library itself and the implementations of
its supported algorithm classes.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7393)
Preallocate an extra limb for some of the big numbers to avoid a reallocation
that can potentially provide a side channel.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7486)
Avoid a timing attack that leaks information via a side channel that
triggers when a BN is resized. Increasing the size of the BNs
prior to doing anything with them suppresses the attack.
Thanks due to Samuel Weiser for finding and locating this.
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7486)
There is a side channel attack against the division used to calculate one of
the modulo inverses in the DSA algorithm. This change takes advantage of the
primality of the modulo and Fermat's little theorem to calculate the inverse
without leaking information.
Thanks to Samuel Weiser for finding and reporting this.
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7487)
Found by Coverity Scan
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7511)
This also gave enough reason to collect the stuff that's common for
all iOS config targets into the template "ios-common".
Fixes#7318
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7403)
The new Configure summary box (41349b5e6d) now hides the warning
about the missing seed source (2805ee1e09) too much. To make it
more visible again, add warning markers.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7509)
The Name Constraints extension contains GeneralSubtree values
indicating included or excluded subtrees. It is defined as:
GeneralSubtree ::= SEQUENCE {
base GeneralName,
minimum [0] BaseDistance DEFAULT 0,
maximum [1] BaseDistance OPTIONAL }
RFC 5280 further specifies:
Within this profile, the minimum and maximum fields are not used with
any name forms, thus, the minimum MUST be zero, and maximum MUST be
absent.
Because the minimum fields has DEFAULT 0, and certificates should be
encoded using DER, the situation where minimum = 0 occurs in a
certificate should not arise. Nevertheless, it does arise. For
example, I have seen certificates issued by Microsoft programs that
contain GeneralSubtree values encoded thus.
Enhance the Name Constraints matching routine to handle the case
where minimum is specified. If present, it must be zero. The
maximum field remains prohibited.
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <yang.yang@baishancloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7039)
Since 1fb9fdc30 we may attempt to buffer a record from the next epoch
that has already been buffered. Prior to that this never occurred.
We simply ignore a failure to buffer a duplicated record.
Fixes#6902
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7414)
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <yang.yang@baishancloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7474)
In commit 820e414d28 (pr #5247) the summary output of the
Configure command was optimized towards instructing people
how to create issue reports.
It turned out that the wording of this message can confuse new
OpenSSL users and make them think that they are seeing an error
message. This commit makes the summary output start with a success
to prevent a misunderstanding. Also it gives more hints to new
OpenSSL users.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7499)
Commit 5b4cb385c1 (#7382) introduced a bug which had the effect
that RAND_add()/RAND_seed() failed for buffer sizes less than
32 bytes. The reason was that now the added random data was used
exlusively as entropy source for reseeding. When the random input
was too short or contained not enough entropy, the DRBG failed
without querying the available entropy sources.
This commit makes drbg_add() act smarter: it checks the entropy
requirements explicitely. If the random input fails this check,
it won't be added as entropy input, but only as additional data.
More precisely, the behaviour depends on whether an os entropy
source was configured (which is the default on most os):
- If an os entropy source is avaible then we declare the buffer
content as additional data by setting randomness to zero and
trigger a regular reseeding.
- If no os entropy source is available, a reseeding will fail
inevitably. So drbg_add() uses a trick to mix the buffer contents
into the DRBG state without forcing a reseeding: it generates a
dummy random byte, using the buffer content as additional data.
Related-to: #7449
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7456)
Increase the load buffer size such that it exceeds the chunk
size by a comfortable amount. This is done to avoid calling
RAND_add() with a small final chunk. Instead, such a small
final chunk will be added together with the previous chunk
(unless it's the only one).
Related-to: #7449
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7456)
The failure of RAND_load_file was only noticed because of the
heap corruption which was reported in #7499 and fixed in commit
5b4cb385c1. To prevent this in the future, RAND_load_file()
now explicitly checks RAND_status() and reports an error if it
fails.
Related-to: #7449
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7456)
When building shared libraries on Windows, we had a clash between
'libcrypto.lib' the static routine library and 'libcrypto.lib' the
import library.
We now change it so the static versions of our libraries get '_static'
appended to their names. These will never get installed, but can
still be used for our internal purposes, such as internal tests.
When building non-shared, the renaming mechanism doesn't come into
play. In that case, the static libraries 'libcrypto.lib' and
'libssl.lib' are installed, just as always.
Fixes#7492
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7496)
NIST has updated their guidelines in appendix D of SP 800-56B rev2 (draft)
providing a formula for the number of security bits it terms of the length
of the RSA key.
This is an implementation of this formula using fixed point arithmetic.
For integers 1 .. 100,000 it rounds down to the next smaller 8 bit strength
270 times. It never errs to the high side. None of the rounded values occur
near any of the commonly selected lengths.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7352)
This bug was introduced by #7382 which enhanced RAND_add() to
accept large buffer sizes. As a consequence, RAND_add() now fails
for buffer sizes less than 32 bytes (i.e. less than 256 bits).
In addition, rand_drbg_get_entropy() forgets to reset the attached
drbg->pool in the case of an error, which leads to the heap corruption.
The problem occurred with RAND_load_file(), which reads the file in
chunks of 1024 bytes each. If the size of the final chunk is less than
32 bytes, then RAND_add() fails, whence RAND_load_file() fails
silently for buffer sizes n = k * 1024 + r with r = 1,...,31.
This commit fixes the heap corruption only. The other issues will
be addressed in a separate pull request.
Thanks to Gisle Vanem for reporting this issue.
Fixes#7449
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7455)
We only had targets for the "simple" shared library names (libfoo.so
and not libfoo.so.x.y on Unix, import library libfoo.lib but not
libfoo.dll on Windows). This has created some confusion why it wasn't
possible to rebuild the less "simple" name directly (just as an
example, someone who mistook the import library on Windows for a
static library, removed the DLL and then found it was difficult to
rebuild directly), so we change the target to include all possible
names.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7451)
An unknown PSK identity could be because its actually a session resumption
attempt. Sessions resumptions and external PSKs are indistinguishable so
the callbacks need to fail gracefully if they don't recognise the identity.
Fixes#7433
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7434)
Previously when a ClientHello arrives with a valid cookie using
DTLSv1_listen() we only "peeked" at the message and left it on the
underlying fd. This works fine for single threaded applications but for
multi-threaded apps this does not work since the fd is typically reused for
the server thread, while a new fd is created and connected for the client.
By "peeking" we leave the message on the server fd, and consequently we
think we've received another valid ClientHello and so we create yet another
fd for the client, and so on until we run out of fds.
In this new approach we remove the ClientHello and buffer it in the SSL
object.
Fixes#6934
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7375)
Rather than using init_buf we use the record layer read and write buffers
in DTLSv1_listen(). These seem more appropriate anyway and will help with
the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7375)
Yes, it's second halving, i.e. it's now 1/4 of original size, or more
specifically inner loop. The challenge with Keccak is that you need
more temporary registers than there are available. By reversing the
order in which columns are assigned in Chi, it's possible to use
three of A[][] registers as temporary prior their assigment.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7294)
{make|swap|get|set}context are removed in POSIX.1-2008, but glibc
apparently keeps providing it.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7420)
The formula used for this is now
kVarianceBlocks = ((255 + 1 + md_size + md_block_size - 1) / md_block_size) + 1
Notice that md_block_size=64 for SHA256, which results on the
magic constant kVarianceBlocks = 6.
However, md_block_size=128 for SHA384 leading to kVarianceBlocks = 4.
CLA:trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7342)
Also, some readers of the code find starting the count at 1 for EE
cert confusing (since RFC5280 counts only non-self-issued intermediate
CAs, but we also counted the leaf). Therefore, never count the EE
cert, and adjust the path length comparison accordinly. This may
be more clear to the reader.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
At the bottom of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-12 and
top of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-13 (last paragraph
of above https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-3.3), we see:
This specification covers two classes of certificates: CA
certificates and end entity certificates. CA certificates may be
further divided into three classes: cross-certificates, self-issued
certificates, and self-signed certificates. Cross-certificates are
CA certificates in which the issuer and subject are different
entities. Cross-certificates describe a trust relationship between
the two CAs. Self-issued certificates are CA certificates in which
the issuer and subject are the same entity. Self-issued certificates
are generated to support changes in policy or operations. Self-
signed certificates are self-issued certificates where the digital
signature may be verified by the public key bound into the
certificate. Self-signed certificates are used to convey a public
key for use to begin certification paths. End entity certificates
are issued to subjects that are not authorized to issue certificates.
that the term "self-issued" is only applicable to CAs, not end-entity
certificates. In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.9
the description of path length constraints says:
The pathLenConstraint field is meaningful only if the cA boolean is
asserted and the key usage extension, if present, asserts the
keyCertSign bit (Section 4.2.1.3). In this case, it gives the
maximum number of non-self-issued intermediate certificates that may
follow this certificate in a valid certification path. (Note: The
last certificate in the certification path is not an intermediate
certificate, and is not included in this limit. Usually, the last
certificate is an end entity certificate, but it can be a CA
certificate.)
This makes it clear that exclusion of self-issued certificates from
the path length count applies only to some *intermediate* CA
certificates. A leaf certificate whether it has identical issuer
and subject or whether it is a CA or not is never part of the
intermediate certificate count. The handling of all leaf certificates
must be the same, in the case of our code to post-increment the
path count by 1, so that we ultimately reach a non-self-issued
intermediate it will be the first one (not zeroth) in the chain
of intermediates.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6813)
The OPENSSL_s390xcap environment variable is used to set bits in the s390x
capability vector to zero. This simplifies testing of different code paths.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6813)
Signed-off-by: Antoine Salon <asalon@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7345)
Replace ECDH_KDF_X9_62() with internal ecdh_KDF_X9_63()
Signed-off-by: Antoine Salon <asalon@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7345)
Commit ffb46830e2 introduced the 'rand_serial' option. When it is used,
the 'serialfile' does not get initialized, i.e. it remains a NULL pointer.
This causes a crash when the NULL pointer is passed to the rotate_serial()
call.
This commit fixes the crash and unifies the pointer checking before
calling the rotate_serial() and save_serial() commands.
Fixes#7412
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7417)
When looking at configured macro definitions, we must look at both
what comes from the config target AND what comes from user
configuration.
Fixes#7396
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7402)
In pull request #4328 the seeding of the DRBG via RAND_add()/RAND_seed()
was implemented by buffering the data in a random pool where it is
picked up later by the rand_drbg_get_entropy() callback. This buffer
was limited to the size of 4096 bytes.
When a larger input was added via RAND_add() or RAND_seed() to the DRBG,
the reseeding failed, but the error returned by the DRBG was ignored
by the two calling functions, which both don't return an error code.
As a consequence, the data provided by the application was effectively
ignored.
This commit fixes the problem by a more efficient implementation which
does not copy the data in memory and by raising the buffer the size limit
to INT32_MAX (2 gigabytes). This is less than the NIST limit of 2^35 bits
but it was chosen intentionally to avoid platform dependent problems
like integer sizes and/or signed/unsigned conversion.
Additionally, the DRBG is now less permissive on errors: In addition to
pushing a message to the openssl error stack, it enters the error state,
which forces a reinstantiation on next call.
Thanks go to Dr. Falko Strenzke for reporting this issue to the
openssl-security mailing list. After internal discussion the issue
has been categorized as not being security relevant, because the DRBG
reseeds automatically and is fully functional even without additional
randomness provided by the application.
Fixes#7381
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7382)
Negative displacement in memory references was not originally specified,
so that for maximum coverage one should abstain from it, just like with
any other extension. [Unless it's guarded by run-time switch, but there
is no switch in keccak1600-s390x.]
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7239)
